92361-92701

92269-93539 subjects 92453-94920

^ code that has been reached
92361 [neoneye adsl] Does there exists a tool for Ruby which records which parts
+ 91297 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 91359 [hal9000 hype] There is coverage.rb in RAA. It's very basic, but it works fine
| + 91415 [neoneye adsl] Wew, this is really a short piece of code.. amazing that it can be done in
| + 91878 [neoneye adsl] Wew, this is really a short piece of code.. amazing that it can be done in
| + 92068 [neoneye adsl] Wew, this is really a short piece of code.. amazing that it can be done in
| + 92258 [neoneye adsl] Wew, this is really a short piece of code.. amazing that it can be done in
|   91419 [nobu.nokada ] less -r
|   + 91529 [neoneye adsl] Thanks..
|   + 91912 [neoneye adsl] Thanks..
|   + 92102 [neoneye adsl] Thanks..
|   + 92292 [neoneye adsl] Thanks..
|     + 91531 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|     + 91913 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|     + 92103 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|     + 92293 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|       + 91537 [neoneye adsl] Ok.. I now propagate the marked status to comments.. output is much better
|       + 91916 [neoneye adsl] Ok.. I now propagate the marked status to comments.. output is much better
|       + 92106 [neoneye adsl] Ok.. I now propagate the marked status to comments.. output is much better
|       + 92296 [neoneye adsl] Ok.. I now propagate the marked status to comments.. output is much better
|         + 91538 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|         + 91917 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|         + 92107 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|         + 92297 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 91839 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92028 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92218 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92369 [bob.news gmx] "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

^ mkfifo in Ruby 1.8?
92371 [basile-news ] Why is (the library call) mkfifo missing in Ruby 1.8? Is there a way
+ 91696 [mike stok.co] You could use syscall :-)  No I'm not advocating this seriously.
+ 91734 [timsuth ihug] require 'dl/import'
+ 91735 [nobu.nokada ] Because just nobody has wanted it yet, perhaps.
+ 91968 [mike stok.co] You could use syscall :-)  No I'm not advocating this seriously.
+ 91977 [timsuth ihug] require 'dl/import'
+ 92158 [mike stok.co] You could use syscall :-)  No I'm not advocating this seriously.
+ 92167 [timsuth ihug] require 'dl/import'
+ 92382 [mike stok.co] You could use syscall :-)  No I'm not advocating this seriously.
+ 92396 [timsuth ihug] require 'dl/import'

^ Ruby Web Application Framework Roundup
92377 [gavin refine] I'm trying to decide which Ruby web application framework to use (if
+ 91308 [tom infoethe] Haven't used it, just figured you'd want to include it...
+ 91309 [curt hibbs.c] I hope you are planning to post the results of your survey somewhere
+ 91311 [surrender_it] define application framework. Maybe amrita could fit in here?
+ 91312 [khaines enig] Iowa.  There is a Sourceforge project for it, but what's there is old and
| + 91314 [ oct zoy.org] If this is a "quick" task for you, I'd love to have a look at your
| | 91319 [khaines enig] After I sent that message, I went ahead and bundled it up, and did a quick
| + 91317 [chrismo clab] Does Iowa use continuations like Seaside\Borges, then?
|   91322 [khaines enig] Yes, it does.  I have not used Borges.  Just read Seaside docs in order to
|   91324 [patrick open] Last SVN Update: 2004-01-31
+ 91318 [chrismo clab] I've not built a production app with this, but I did extend the sushiNet
| 91320 [chrismo clab] I meant to add, on the upside it was easy to work with (when I wasn't
+ 91842 [surrender_it] define application framework. Maybe amrita could fit in here?
+ 92033 [surrender_it] define application framework. Maybe amrita could fit in here?
+ 92223 [surrender_it] define application framework. Maybe amrita could fit in here?
+ 92379 [surrender_it] define application framework. Maybe amrita could fit in here?
  + 91313 [gavin refine] Damn...I was afraid someone would call my bluff :)
  + 91844 [gavin refine] Damn...I was afraid someone would call my bluff :)
  + 92034 [gavin refine] Damn...I was afraid someone would call my bluff :)
  + 92224 [gavin refine] Damn...I was afraid someone would call my bluff :)
  + 92381 [gavin refine] Damn...I was afraid someone would call my bluff :)
    + 91328 [paul vudmask] You've pretty well described Zope.org. When you're done porting that to
    | + 91335 [vjoel PATH.B] Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Zope is pretty much the only reason I ever use any
    | + 91411 [ gm navel.gr] you also described our Ruby Web Application Server (version 2 is
    | + 91876 [ gm navel.gr] you also described our Ruby Web Application Server (version 2 is
    | + 92066 [ gm navel.gr] you also described our Ruby Web Application Server (version 2 is
    | + 92256 [ gm navel.gr] you also described our Ruby Web Application Server (version 2 is
    |   + 91410 [surrender_it] finally !
    |   + 91445 [paul_vudmask] Nice! So these pages are running Root? I dont need to
    |   | + 91449 [michael_s_ca] Cerise is based on j2ee type paradigms.  It seems pretty intuitive
    |   | + 91450 [khaines enig] For my purposes, I have a really simple definition.  A Web Application
    |   |   91455 [paul_vudmask] Sounds good to me...like user/content/workflow
    |   |   91459 [khaines enig] Well, for my purposes, Iowa _generally_ just uses regular HTML with an
    |   |   91464 [paul_vudmask] Seperation of duties(developers from designers) is
    |   |   91467 [khaines enig] The seperation is beneficial even when the developer and the designer are
    |   |   91470 [paul_vudmask] I sure do agree.
    |   |   91600 [ng johnwlong] This is essentially eruby.
    |   |   91618 [paul_vudmask] Exactly - i use eruby in lieu of Amrita for
    |   |   91621 [khaines enig] I used to be a big fan of mixing code right into the HTML, but have, over
    |   |   91627 [tom infoethe] I know just the place for it!
    |   |   91628 [khaines enig] Probably maybe.  I looked at Rubyforge a couple of months ago but decided
    |   + 91875 [surrender_it] finally !
    |   + 92065 [surrender_it] finally !
    |   + 92255 [surrender_it] finally !
    |     + 91532 [ gm navel.gr] when we find time to write some simple docs, and a small example
    |     + 91914 [ gm navel.gr] when we find time to write some simple docs, and a small example
    |     + 92104 [ gm navel.gr] when we find time to write some simple docs, and a small example
    |     + 92294 [ gm navel.gr] when we find time to write some simple docs, and a small example
    + 91357 [mailinglists] Thats a common technical misunderstanding.

^ role pattern lib for ruby
92383 [shasckaw sky] Im' searching for a ruby lib that provides a role pattern framework.
+ 91349 [itsme213 hot] See Ruby Object Teams http://sourceforge.net/projects/robjectteam/
+ 91855 [itsme213 hot] See Ruby Object Teams http://sourceforge.net/projects/robjectteam/
+ 92045 [itsme213 hot] See Ruby Object Teams http://sourceforge.net/projects/robjectteam/
+ 92235 [itsme213 hot] See Ruby Object Teams http://sourceforge.net/projects/robjectteam/
+ 92411 [itsme213 hot] See Ruby Object Teams http://sourceforge.net/projects/robjectteam/
  + 91358 [shasckaw sky] Thansk for the link, it looks interesting but it is perhaps too complex
  + 91859 [shasckaw sky] Thansk for the link, it looks interesting but it is perhaps too complex
  + 92049 [shasckaw sky] Thansk for the link, it looks interesting but it is perhaps too complex
  + 92239 [shasckaw sky] Thansk for the link, it looks interesting but it is perhaps too complex
  + 92420 [shasckaw sky] Thansk for the link, it looks interesting but it is perhaps too complex
    + 91397 [bob.news gmx] "shasckaw" <shasckaw@skynet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    + 91542 [shasckaw sky] Now, I know the truth, I had a bug with my archive manager that's why I
    + 91872 [bob.news gmx] "shasckaw" <shasckaw@skynet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    + 91919 [shasckaw sky] Now, I know the truth, I had a bug with my archive manager that's why I
    + 92063 [bob.news gmx] "shasckaw" <shasckaw@skynet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    + 92108 [shasckaw sky] Now, I know the truth, I had a bug with my archive manager that's why I
    + 92252 [bob.news gmx] "shasckaw" <shasckaw@skynet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    | + 91398 [shasckaw sky] I'll try that way,
    | + 91873 [shasckaw sky] I'll try that way,
    | + 92062 [shasckaw sky] I'll try that way,
    | + 92253 [shasckaw sky] I'll try that way,
    + 92299 [shasckaw sky] Now, I know the truth, I had a bug with my archive manager that's why I

^ nuby problem with net/http
92398 [kris_80 btin] I am trying to do some basic http stuff with Ruby but I can't get the
+ 91746 [daniel boven] maybe yout try here
+ 91754 [ptkwt aracne] Note that a couple of things have changed in Net::HTTP since the book came
+ 91765 [kris_80 btin] Just want to thank you both for your quick responses...it works great now!
+ 91984 [ptkwt aracne] Note that a couple of things have changed in Net::HTTP since the book came
+ 91987 [kris_80 btin] Just want to thank you both for your quick responses...it works great now!
+ 92180 [ptkwt aracne] Note that a couple of things have changed in Net::HTTP since the book came
+ 92187 [kris_80 btin] Just want to thank you both for your quick responses...it works great now!
+ 92406 [ptkwt aracne] Note that a couple of things have changed in Net::HTTP since the book came
+ 92412 [kris_80 btin] Just want to thank you both for your quick responses...it works great now!

^ Packaging (was Re: HTML Parsing (round 2))
92399 [martindemell] Which makes me think a useful feature for a packaging system would be
91752 [jos catnook.] Heh. Let's first adopt just _any_ packaging system for Ruby, then worry about

^ Destructive String Methods
92403 [google johnw] Is there a way to tell when a destructive method has been called? I've
91339 [djd15 po.cwr] Well, here -- http://www.rubycentral.com/ref/ref_c_string.html -- is
+ 91343 [bob.news gmx] "Dan Doel" <djd15@po.cwru.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 91361 [ng johnwlong] I was hoping for something other than that. I like to maintain forward
| 91371 [nathaniel ta] I don't know what you're doing with it, but this seems to be begging
| 91387 [ng johnwlong] Right. A to_s method on a custom object may be just the thing... Strings are
+ 91853 [bob.news gmx] "Dan Doel" <djd15@po.cwru.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92043 [bob.news gmx] "Dan Doel" <djd15@po.cwru.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92233 [bob.news gmx] "Dan Doel" <djd15@po.cwru.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
+ 92407 [bob.news gmx] "Dan Doel" <djd15@po.cwru.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

^ [NUBY]  Some simple (?) type questions
92414 [silly silly.] Hey guys,
91787 [j rjimlad.or] Okay, apparently Ruby's floats are doubles, but that's probably not

^ [OT] MS have right on the word "Windows" ?
92417 [phasis68 kor] Microsoft is pressuring wxWindows to stop using the word "Windows" in the
+ 91772 [ptkwt aracne] What about XWindows (which I believe has been around a longer than the
+ 91991 [ptkwt aracne] What about XWindows (which I believe has been around a longer than the
+ 92195 [ptkwt aracne] What about XWindows (which I believe has been around a longer than the
+ 92419 [ptkwt aracne] What about XWindows (which I believe has been around a longer than the
| + 91773 [hal9000 hype] That's only a slang term. The actual name is the X Window System. That
| + 91774 [mailinglists] At the moment it is different for each country. Lindows won the trial in
| + 91789 [dooby d10.ka] Most GUIs are derivative of early research at Xerox-PARC, aren't they ? -
| + 91998 [dooby d10.ka] Most GUIs are derivative of early research at Xerox-PARC, aren't they ? -
| + 92211 [dooby d10.ka] Most GUIs are derivative of early research at Xerox-PARC, aren't they ? -
| + 92433 [dooby d10.ka] Most GUIs are derivative of early research at Xerox-PARC, aren't they ? -
+ 92450 [ jupp gmx.de] [SNIP]

^ I too dumb to program
92422 [Lester_t_lin] Because I a moron.
+ 92473 [rove.monteux] sounds like it
| + 92474 [bob.news gmx] "Rove Monteux" <rove.monteux@fluid-rock.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
| + 92495 [rb229 yahoo.] Well, I think this has the potential to be an interesting thread
|   + 92497 [rove.monteux] Quoting,
|   + 92504 [gsinclair so] Ruby satisfies these criteria in spades.  No reason you won't like it.
|   + 92539 [bob.news gmx] "Rob Bryant" <rb229@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
|   | 92590 [rmb25612 yah] If you're using MS Windows then try out the FREE Gui4Cli script
|   + 92573 [mikkel-remov] "Rob Bryant" <rb229@yahoo.com> skrev i en meddelelse
+ 92701 [anon nospam.] yes  :-P

^ Threads for dummies
92425 [sv-erik fjer] Can somone please tell me howto handle threads in the code below
92466 [bob.news gmx] "Svend-Erik Kj Madsen" <sv-erik@fjernmig_stofanet.dk> schrieb im

^ msvcrt-ruby18.dll ?
92426 [intc_ctor ya] I tried building Ruby from source on Windows using MSVC++ today.  I
+ 91380 [dooby d10.ka] 1)  Not related.  msvcrt-ruby18.dll is the ruby runtime when linking with
+ 91866 [dooby d10.ka] 1)  Not related.  msvcrt-ruby18.dll is the ruby runtime when linking with
+ 92056 [dooby d10.ka] 1)  Not related.  msvcrt-ruby18.dll is the ruby runtime when linking with
+ 92246 [dooby d10.ka] 1)  Not related.  msvcrt-ruby18.dll is the ruby runtime when linking with
+ 92434 [dooby d10.ka] 1)  Not related.  msvcrt-ruby18.dll is the ruby runtime when linking with

^ Re: Threads for dummies ver 0001
92427 [sv-erik fjer] Got this  wrong

^ Windows Registry
92430 [bobx linuxma] Does Ruby come out of the box with ways to handle the Windows registry?
+ 91377 [tietew-ml-ru] [Windows Registry]
| + 91378 [bobx linuxma] Thanks I will!
| + 91865 [bobx linuxma] Thanks I will!
| + 92055 [bobx linuxma] Thanks I will!
| + 92245 [bobx linuxma] Thanks I will!
| + 92432 [bobx linuxma] Thanks I will!
+ 91379 [bobcalco all] In addition to registry.rb, Ruby supports COM, which let's you use native
+ 91392 [ptkwt aracne] yes.  ON the Windows distribution, look for registry.rb in the Win32
+ 91413 [rodrigo.berm] It can give you a clue ...
+ 91871 [ptkwt aracne] yes.  ON the Windows distribution, look for registry.rb in the Win32
+ 92061 [ptkwt aracne] yes.  ON the Windows distribution, look for registry.rb in the Win32
+ 92251 [ptkwt aracne] yes.  ON the Windows distribution, look for registry.rb in the Win32

^ Ruby9i 0.2.1 release is broken
92436 [nycsubwaysur] Jim,

^ TkEntry with { (left brace) characters
92437 [webrg.ruby-t] I've tried to boil this down to be as meaningful as possible. I'm

^ New Computer, version, confusion
92440 [ronjeffries ] I just got a new computer and need to get stuff moved over to it.
+ 91567 [vjoel PATH.B] This works for me, does it help?
| + 91596 [ronjeffries ] Thanks Joel ... I think maybe I'll change my standard project.rb file
| + 91930 [ronjeffries ] Thanks Joel ... I think maybe I'll change my standard project.rb file
| + 92120 [ronjeffries ] Thanks Joel ... I think maybe I'll change my standard project.rb file
| + 92310 [ronjeffries ] Thanks Joel ... I think maybe I'll change my standard project.rb file
| + 92444 [ronjeffries ] Thanks Joel ... I think maybe I'll change my standard project.rb file
|   91599 [vjoel PATH.B] TestCase = Test::Unit::TestCase unless defined?(TestCase)
+ 91568 [nathaniel ta] Well, previously you were probably using an actual installation of
  + 91595 [ronjeffries ] OK, gotcha. I can do that, or use Joel's trick. I was just concerned
  + 91929 [ronjeffries ] OK, gotcha. I can do that, or use Joel's trick. I was just concerned
  + 92119 [ronjeffries ] OK, gotcha. I can do that, or use Joel's trick. I was just concerned
  + 92309 [ronjeffries ] OK, gotcha. I can do that, or use Joel's trick. I was just concerned
  + 92443 [ronjeffries ] OK, gotcha. I can do that, or use Joel's trick. I was just concerned

^ === confusion
92445 [ian caliban.] After a couple of years of Ruby programming, I find that the ===
92461 [g_ogata optu] This keeps coming up from time to time.

^ VRuby-question: yellow rectangle; lines around elements
92446 [armin xss.de] I certainly miss the obvious.

^ Re: [RFC] 'via' proposal
92451 [assaph avaya] #!/usr/bin/ruby
92533 [elathan phys] That was very close to what I wanted, thanx. :-)

^ Re: Im too dumb to program
92452 [wjl icecaver] charset="utf-8"
threads.html
top