69031-69701 subjects 69446-70011
69249 [finnancelike] 特別融資キャンペーン実施中
Type, Class, Domain, Ruby, Relational Model [Was: Re: Does dynamic typing make it easier to place an object in a container?]
69263 [mwilson13@co] Just a note on my questions about type (also known as class, in Ruby).
69269 [nemo@he lo r] ...type = class...
69281 [mwilson13@co] Yes, of course. I mean that every class is a type, but I am aware that
Looking for efficient Ruby C way to append strings
69264 [jim@fr ez .o] a = "some text\n"
+ 69265 [jim@fr ez .o] Well, to answer my own question, I found rb_str_cat().
+ 69279 [nobu.nokada@] It will certainly corrupt heap. You must never do it
Purchase, Diet Pills, and other prescriptions with no Prescription Ruby-talk
69266 [nhk6yj2d2@ao] ...
What does NSString.to_s do when the string isn't ASCII?
69270 [sroberts@un ] A ruby/cocoa question, maybe someone here has an idea?
Controlling an interactive program from Ruby
69271 [dcarrera@ma ] I want to control an interactive program from Ruby, in the Expect style.
+ 69272 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Passwords are unsafe.. take a look at ssh-keys.
| + 69273 [dcarrera@ma ] I'll take a look at it.
| | 69274 [0bz63fz3m1qt] * network packets can get sniffed by evil people hooked up
| | 69277 [vjoel@PA H. ] My understanding was that ssh passwords are not sent in plain text. From
| | 69286 [batsman.geo@] The reasons given before don't hold IMHO, as
| | 69288 [B.Candler@po] The passphrase on an ssh key tends to be equally weak (or totally
| | + 69289 [Ruben.Vandeg] Using an ssh-agent, gives you the benefit that you only have to fill in
| | + 69321 [dcarrera@ma ] Well, I'm not. I realize how silly that would be. My passwords are
| | 69341 [B.Candler@po] OK - but then you must be supplying the passphrase to ssh somehow (and the
| + 69275 [dcarrera@ma ] Thanks. It's working great now.
+ 69276 [0bz63fz3m1qt] source login@desthost:/destination/.
Re: Having trouble getting iconv-0.5 ... on OS X (actually extconf.rb bug)
69278 [sroberts@un ] The error turned out to be deceptively simple. extconf.rb fails to find
69284 [nobu.nokada@] Try `ruby extconf.rb --iconv-dir=/usr/local'.
69285 [sroberts@un ] Sure, but isn't that what extconf.rb is checking, whether you need
69291 [nobu.nokada@] Yes, on such systems, -liconv isn't needed.
69320 [sroberts@un ] ...
69337 [nobu.nokada@] You're right, remove second "iconv" from have_library. I've
69400 [sroberts@un ] Works like a charm, thank you very much.
69280 [0bz63fz3m1qt] I am wondering what exactly ruby_script() is doing ?
69283 [nobu.nokada@] Changing $0 and source file name in stack trace.
69292 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Are you telling me that I should be able to see the
69293 [decoux@mo lo] pigeon% cat b.rb
69294 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Weird.. I don't see any "embed" in my backtraces?
+ 69295 [decoux@mo lo] You call -e it display -e
| 69299 [0bz63fz3m1qt] [snip good code example]
+ 69296 [nobu.nokada@] Because the source is given by "-e".
69297 [0bz63fz3m1qt] OK.. Now I've swapped them. But it makes no difference.
69298 [decoux@mo lo] When ruby compile a script (or a string) it store in each node the name of
69300 [0bz63fz3m1qt] I think I got that.. But what Im not understanding is
69302 [decoux@mo lo] The backtrace are outputted for each frame created, when you write
69305 [0bz63fz3m1qt] I see.. only rb_require(). BTW what is a frame?
69307 [decoux@mo lo] I must take care : SpamAssassin think that you are a spammer :-)))
69312 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Exactly.. I've converted to the dark side and im very dangerous!!
using ruby reflection to generate code
69282 [doug@be ve .] i'm curious if anyone out there is using ruby reflection to generate
69313 [ptkwt@sh ll ] I'm not currently doing this, but I do kind of want to be able to convert
+ 69328 [emilie3012@n] I'm using Ruby as a scripting tool for an OpenGL app, Would it be
+ 69403 [doug@be ve .] here is a first version, i put some comments at the top to discuss its
+ 69407 [ptkwt@sh ll ] Thanks for sharing.
| 69445 [doug@be ve .] i agree that objc requires fewer hints, but there's still some stuff i
| + 69450 [ptkwt@sh ll ] What do you use for C++ unit testing now? I remember trying cppunit and
| + 69482 [austin@ha os] Have you considered creating an output generator for rdoc?
+ 69410 [B.Candler@po] Perhaps you could even treat them as assertions, e.g.
problems embedding ruby in win32
69301 [gaffer@ga fe] i'm attempting to embed ruby into a win32 application i'm developing,
69303 [decoux@mo lo] When you compile define "IMPORT" and "NT=1" (something like -DIMPORT and
+ 69306 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Perhaps we should add such compile-issues to
+ 69322 [gaffer@ga fe] adding "#define IMPORT" before including ruby fixed it, thankyou
Stale sockets under WinXP
69316 [pmak@aa ni e] I've been experimenting with a Ruby web server called httpd.rb
About rtttl player (new on RAA)
69317 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
[OT] Re: The hundred year language
69318 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
wsdlDriver problem (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl related)
69319 [surrender_it] well, I was trying to use wsdlDriver as in the sample from 
ANN: RFC 2047 decoding library (MIME format for non-ascii in mail headers)
69323 [sroberts@un ] There was a few posts about this, so perhaps somebody will find it
69431 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
69486 [sroberts@un ] Thanks for the feedback. I'll run your example (thanks) through iconv,
69512 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
69570 [sroberts@un ] (Nobu, this question relates to using iconv to convert from iso-2022-jp
69571 [nobu.nokada@] Yes, iso-2022-jp is stateful. So you have to use Iconv.close
69658 [sroberts@un ] The last version of rfc2047.rb had a bug with stateful encodings, here's
69671 [nobu.nokada@] text = Iconv.iconv(target, charset, text).join
Local/global variable dilemma
69334 [tim@ba es id] module Example
+ 69336 [dblack@su er] module Example
+ 69343 [B.Candler@po] Class variables are only available to a class and its descendants, so you
Re: ANN: ri v1.8
69335 [james_b@ne r] Sorry. It should be good now.
69338 [james_b@ne r] Yet another programming language list.
69344 [batsman.geo@] doGoogleSearch('+"<language> programming" -tv')/10000 is used
69347 [Ephaeton@gm ] Hey, have a look at the listing. Java is #1. How more fucked
+ 69392 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
| 69394 [Ephaeton@gm ] Well, point me to a working portable implementation of the runtime
| + 69396 [Ruben.Vandeg] (1) http://www.go-mono.net
| + 69432 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
| | 69469 [pabs@pa lo r] [snipped]
| + 69653 [jj5412@ea th] Actually, BF isn't like Java at all.
+ 69399 [abuse@du ch ] #12 bash "My Script doesn't work on FreeBSD!" "It's a *bash* script, not a *sh* script!"
69339 [skywizard@ti] $ pwd
+ 69340 [nobu.nokada@] I couldn't reproduce it on Linux. Does this gives same result?
+ 69353 [han.holl@pr ] Strange. This runs fine on my system, both on 1.6.8 and 1.8.0p2.
| + 69354 [decoux@mo lo] Well I don't know : perhaps because realpath() don't give the same result
| + 69355 [nobu.nokada@] File.expand_path doesn't follow symbolic links, while
| 69388 [han.holl@po ] In that case, wouldn't a wrapper around realpath be really
| 69402 [nobu.nokada@] Sorry, but I can't imagine how to preserve symlink names. And
+ 69356 [nobu.nokada@] I hope this is fixed now.
ANN: FreeRIDE 0.5.0 Release Candidate 2
69342 [curt@hi bs c] FreeRIDE 0.5.0 Release Candidate 2 is available for download. Go to
+ 69360 [Stephan.Kaem] That's really good news!
| 69371 [curt@hi bs c] Actually, that's a good question.
+ 69370 [batsman.geo@] If you use Debian, you might want to test my packages.
+ 69440 [batsman.geo@] Would it be possible to create the Debian package repository in
69448 [curt@hi bs c] Sure. I'll send you a private email with the info you wall need to upload
[Q] A class, that knows about it's instances + Sets
69357 [kgergely@ml ] In my recent project, I need, that a class knows about their instances.
+ 69358 [decoux@mo lo] Look at ObjectSpace::each_object
+ 69362 [nemo@he lo r] I ran into a similar problem using Madeleine. In Madeleine, you need to
| + 69365 [decoux@mo lo] extend Module
| + 69367 [B.Candler@po] FWIW, I believe the normal way of doing this is simply to make 'new'
| | 69369 [B.Candler@po] Oops, spurious line, ignore that one.
| + 69397 [drbrain@se m] it
+ 69364 [tpeters@in a] module Instance_Iterator
Re: [Q] documentation 1.8
69359 [kgergely@ml ] Thanx for the quick answers!
+ 69361 [decoux@mo lo] See http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=shim-ruby16_18
+ 69363 [nemo@he lo r] Chris
How do I call a regex from C?
69366 [jim@fr ez .o] I need to call a regex from C, but haven't quite figured
69368 [decoux@mo lo] It really depend what call you want to do.
69374 [jim@fr ez .o] static VALUE re_equal;
+ 69375 [B.Candler@po] The argument to rb_reg_regcomp is a VALUE, not a C null-terminated string.
+ 69376 [decoux@mo lo] not allowed : you must give only VALUE
69377 [jim@fr ez .o] re_equal = rb_reg_regcomp("\\s*=\\s");
69378 [decoux@mo lo] See [ruby-talk:69375], you must give a VALUE (rb_str_new2()), not a string
69379 [jim@fr ez .o] Thanks
69380 [decoux@mo lo] Something like this
69381 [jim@fr ez .o] Cool, how did you know my code without me sending it to you? :)
69382 [decoux@mo lo] No, you don't need to protect id's
[BUG], ruby 1.6.8 (2002-12-24) [i586-mswin32]
69372 [student_vien] I have an existing DLL which is using the MFC.
69373 [decoux@mo lo] Be sure to define IMPORT (perhaps with NT=1) when you compile your
69395 [offstuff@ao ] for c++.
69411 [decoux@mo lo] Well, I know nothing about windows, perhaps you can see with the author of
Parrot object notes posted
69383 [pate@ey er a] In a move that's sure to interest cardinal and parrot enthusiasts, Dan's
[Q] Array default values, << and <<=
69385 [kgergely@ml ] I've found a nice solution to have arrays and hashes a nice default
69386 [B.Candler@po] Some care needed there. Every non-existent key of b will return a reference
inheirit from a swig-class
69387 [0bz63fz3m1qt] I want to inheirit from a SWIG-class, but I cannot. Why?
69401 [emilie3012@n] I assumed this was prob with tutorial code. Had a look and got same
69404 [0bz63fz3m1qt] This modification makes it work like a dream, thanks :-)
69461 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Simon Strandgaard
rubynet-announce Digest, Vol 3, Issue 2
69389 [rubynet-anno] Send rubynet-announce mailing list submissions to
Book: Der Pragmatische Programmierer
69393 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
Behaviour of FreeRIDE 0.5.0 RC 2
69398 [Stephan.Kaem] If I create or open a file everything seems fine and clicking the rocket
69406 [curt@hi bs c] Thanks,
matching nodes using rexml
69408 [nospam123@an] Question about XPath queries in rexml.
69434 [ser@ge ma e-] That's a bug. I've taken a look at it, and I suspect that what you've
69515 [ser@ge ma e-] It turned out the solution wasn't that complex. I'll be posting
69554 [nospam123@an] Thanks for the feedback and the quick fix.
Ruby Weekly News
69409 [Dave@Pr gm t] Ruby Weekly News: 04/14/2003
69412 [student_vien] sorry for this posting, it should be in another thread but
+ 69414 [0bz63fz3m1qt] If its necessary for you to call "ruby_init", then it sound to me
+ 69453 [offstuff@ao ] I'v solved the problem...
69456 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Well.. the world is not perfect :-)
rb_class_new_instance behaves strange
69413 [0bz63fz3m1qt] # (a)
69415 [nobu.nokada@] (a) passes the given block but (b) doesn't, in normal case.
69417 [0bz63fz3m1qt] OK. This is what im trying to do.
69418 [0bz63fz3m1qt] BTW this is the SWIG im using :-)
69419 [decoux@mo lo] Can you give the code generated by SWIG, if it's not too long or send me
69421 [0bz63fz3m1qt] the SWIG generated file is
+ 69422 [decoux@mo lo] I've not found 1.3.18, at sourceforge there is only .19, .17
| 69423 [0bz63fz3m1qt] I have just installed the newest SWIG version 1.3.19 and generated a new
+ 69425 [nobu.nokada@] SWIG doesn't seem to use rb_define_alloc_func(), so allocator
69427 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Is this a problem SWIG ?
+ 69429 [nobu.nokada@] SWIG (1.3.19 at least) seems to not support ruby 1.8.
| 69483 [emilie3012@n] And the practical upshot is?
+ 69433 [lyle@us rs s] [Nobu said:]
+ 69435 [decoux@mo lo] Nothing new for this, from bdb
| 69451 [lyle@us rs s] Thanks very much, Guy; I've incorporated this into the SWIG CVS and it
+ 69437 [matz@ru y- a] I'm confident. Tell me if you see any problem that I don't know.
+ 69443 [nobu.nokada@] 1.8 defines HAVE_RB_DEFINE_ALLOC_FUNC for that purpose.
69452 [lyle@us rs s] <snip patches>
69464 [nobu.nokada@] Sorry, I missed it. You can make them abstract by undefining
69548 [lyle@us rs s] OK.
69565 [nobu.nokada@] You're correct of course. Just my mistake, sorry.
69657 [0bz63fz3m1qt] Thanks everyone for solving this problem :-)
69664 [lyle@us rs s] Don't know, but you don't have to wait. Just follow the instructions at
69424 [victorloma@n] Dear Sir/Madam,
69428 [dcarrera@ma ] Could someone point me to an open-source SPAM filter that I can install on
+ 69458 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
+ 69467 [spectra@de i] It's a bayesian spam filter. I've already filtered over-60.000 emails with it
69468 [dcarrera@ma ] Looks interesting.
RFC 2047 と ひらがな、 カタカナ と 常用漢字
69430 [ jupp@gm .d ] さようなら
[OT] spam filter Was: Re: Urgent Assistance
69436 [brett_willia] www.spamassassin.org
69438 [xrfang@ho ma] I believe the ruby-talk group is already filtered by SpamAssassin. I would
+ 69449 [wtanksleyjr@] Unlikely, considering all the spams that get through
| 69455 [B.Candler@po] No, it certainly is filtered. Look at the headers of the spams which get
| 69457 [dave@pr gp o] The mail-news gateway is filtered: I run SpamAssassin on messages going
| + 69460 [dcarrera@ma ] This explains a lot. I have never seen a mailing list with as much spam
| | 69462 [xrfang@ho ma] I don't see why we can't use a ruby based filter here for ruby-talk. I have
| | 69466 [dave@pr gp o] I'll happily use the best tool for the job. Is there a page somewhere
| + 69463 [B.Candler@po] I'm surprised that spamassassin found "Dear Somebody" as the only suspicious
| | 69465 [dave@pr gp o] The gateway uses SA 2.5. I'm not sure who posted a 2.2 header.
| | 69472 [brett_willia] I personally run with 3.5 as the threshold, and have increased the point score
| + 69475 [tim@ba es id] I've found the same thing recently; that SpamAssassin's effectiveness has
| + 69491 [roberto@RE O] Are you using the Bayesian filter from SA? Properly trained, a Bayesian
| + 69933 [comp.lang.ru] _ You might want to look at something statistical like
+ 69459 [ jupp@gm .d ] Saluton!
69477 [hal9000@hy e] Just to comment on this part... if the
ANN: Debian packages of FreeRIDE, FOX, FXRuby, Ripper, FXScintilla, etc
69439 [batsman.geo@] cat >> /etc/apt/sources.list
+ 69493 [cedric.foll@] It doesn't work.
| 69506 [batsman.geo@] What, "apt-get -b source freeride" (1) or the installation of FreeRIDE (2)?
| 69578 [cedric.foll@] Yes i was that.
| 69603 [batsman.geo@] Hehe, it's just a package generated with equivs, it's got no source :-)
| 69610 [cedric.foll@] # apt-get install freeride
| 69613 [batsman.geo@] I meant that I have tested that with the repository I have yet to upload
| 69638 [cedric.foll@] Thanks a lot for your answer.
+ 69874 [drejewic@ws ] Thank you Mauricio, I have installed all of those packages. I have Debian
case insensitive match with regexp object
69441 [lists@de on ] irb(main):001:0> a = "test"
+ 69442 [lists@de on ] Sorry for wasting time, I found it immediatly after even though I had
+ 69444 [nobu.nokada@] reg = /test/i
+ 69504 [gsinclair@so] This post (below) made me wonder if you can enforce case-insensitivity
69508 [wkb@ai ma l.] Gavin,