From ruby-talk-admin@ruby-lang.org Thu Dec 15 22:57:47 2005 Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id jBFDvlZk020275; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:47 +0900 Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3102B5ACC; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B000CF04850; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE97F04846; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [210.163.138.100]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14731630029; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F02339FE; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB72D33A19 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28620-02 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from sinus.lauschmusik.de (sinus.lauschmusik.de [213.95.32.201]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA30339FE for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by sinus.lauschmusik.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmtZV-0004cl-B4 for ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:55:01 +0100 Received: from g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com (g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com) by sinus.lauschmusik.de with NTTP id 166198 for ; Thu Dec 15 14:55:01 CET 2005 Received: from [69.86.146.131] by g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com (unknown) with NNTP id 166198 for ; Thu Dec 15 14:55:01 CET 2005 Received: from Usenet via a Usenet to mail gateway located at lauschmusik.de. This service provided as a courtesy to the ruby-talk mailing list. If this message is SPAM, its ultimate origin is Usenet, not this gateway program. All subscribers to the ruby-talk mailing list agree to receive the Usenet postings made to comp.lang.ruby via this gateway. Please see http://www.ruby-lang.org/ruby-talk-usenet-policy.html. Delivered-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:57:40 +0900 Posted: 15 Dec 2005 05:54:33 -0800 From: "Francis Hwang" Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Subject: Re: Is ruby dbi still in development? To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML) Message-Id: <1134654873.431363.134040@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1134615780.931806.285390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> X-ML-Name: ruby-talk X-Mail-Count: 30 X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-Original-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Path: noris.net!news.osn.de!diablo1-ffm.news.osn.de!newsfeed.kamp.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.86.146.131 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1134654878 2677 127.0.0.1 (15 Dec 2005 13:54:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.86.146.131; posting-account=oKoUARMAAABEr3VnSjKFvz77ZL0QIfmbbNq4gWmw6bSP7gR4otDdmg X-From-Usenet: see Received: header above. X-rubymirror: yes X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on beryllium.ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,QENCPTR1,RCVDFRMLOCALIP autolearn=no version=3.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Lines: 16 List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] List-Post: List-Owner: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 As Kirk said, we're moving forward ... but slowly. These sorts of projects, unfortunately, don't always attract that much attention since they're difficult and unglamorous. Everyone involved has lots of other projects to maintain, which is often the way. Anyway, which "important features" are important to you? It'd be helpful to us to know more about people's expectations of what ruby dbi should do. cap wrote: > The lastest version of ruby's dbi is build at 2003-09-07, 2 years ago > And the las version of the perl 's is build at 2005-11-29.... > > So when can we a newer version of ruby's dbi ? > The 0.0.21 is out of date and lack of many important features