From ruby-talk-admin@ruby-lang.org Thu Dec 15 21:36:30 2005 Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id jBFCaUZk017705; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:30 +0900 Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B715B96; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:30 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1AAF04847; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8023BF04842; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [210.163.138.100]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D014263002C; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BE9339C7; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525DA339D0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18263-08 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from server1.enigo.com (www.enigo.com [64.34.176.110]) by beryllium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4AC339C7 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([65.39.118.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by server1.enigo.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBFCZUHf024413 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:35:30 -0600 Delivered-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:22 +0900 Posted: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:37:37 -0700 From: Kirk Haines Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Subject: Re: Is ruby dbi still in development? To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML) Message-Id: <200512150537.38143.khaines@enigo.com> In-Reply-To: <1134615780.931806.285390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1134615780.931806.285390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> X-ML-Name: ruby-talk X-Mail-Count: 20 X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= User-Agent: KMail/1.8 X-Original-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on beryllium.ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BLARS00, BLARS_SPAM00,CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,GB2312_CHARSET,RCVDFRMLOCALIP, RCVD_IN_BLARS,RCVD_IN_BLARS_SPAM,RCVD_IN_BLARS_SPAM_WEB,RCVD_IN_CBL autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Lines: 16 List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] List-Post: List-Owner: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 On Wednesday 14 December 2005 8:07 pm, cap wrote: > The lastest version of ruby's dbi is build at 2003-09-07, 2 years ago > And the las version of the perl 's is build at 2005-11-29.... > > So when can we a newer version of ruby's dbi ? > The 0.0.21 is out of date and lack of many important features Yes. There is now a team consisting of myself, Daniel Berger, Francis Hwang, and Patrick May on the DBI project. We are in the process of updating the source code repository for DBI on Rubyforge with the latest source so that we can continue development on DBI. Thanks, Kirk Haines