ruby_talk (199601-199800)

 < ^ > 
199601 06/06/29 22:34:51 [jawadh90 gmail.] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-talk ML) You are added automatically
199602 06/06/29 22:39:12 [james grayprodu] Re: [SUMMARY] pp Pascal (#84)
199603 06/06/29 22:57:47 [mvette13 gmail.] Re: XML in ruby
199604 06/06/29 23:00:52 [agouti gmail.co] command line with regexp same as script but didn't work
199605 06/06/29 23:01:49 [leslieviljoen g] Re: [SUMMARY] pp Pascal (#84)
199606 06/06/29 23:13:04 [pedrocr gmail.c] Re: XML in ruby
199607 06/06/29 23:24:31 [transfire gmail] Re: eigenclass not extensible ?
199608 06/06/29 23:24:41 [eduardoflores f] Re: IRB, Windows and International Keyboards
199609 06/06/29 23:34:49 [ara.t.howard no] Re: flexible graph library - sans hash
199610 06/06/29 23:46:32 [gthiesfeld sbcg] Re: XML in ruby
199611 06/06/30 00:01:08 [pedrocr gmail.c] Re: XML in ruby
199612 06/06/30 00:07:18 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Problem with gem install, rubygems 0.9.0
199613 06/06/30 00:10:33 [pedrocr gmail.c] Re: XML in ruby
199614 06/06/30 00:13:10 [aglarond gmail.] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199615 06/06/30 00:19:43 [pbattley gmail.] Re: command line with regexp same as script but didn't work
199616 06/06/30 00:22:46 [logancapaldo gm] Re: command line with regexp same as script but didn't work
199617 06/06/30 00:24:36 [pbattley gmail.] Re: Changes to x within x.each()
199618 06/06/30 00:36:45 [rwvtveer gmail.] Re: EXIF Library
199619 06/06/30 01:09:40 [james grayprodu] Re: [SUMMARY] pp Pascal (#84)
199620 06/06/30 01:13:39 [zimba.tm gmail.] Re: eigenclass not extensible ?
199621 06/06/30 01:21:40 [logancapaldo gm] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199622 06/06/30 01:26:40 [logancapaldo gm] Re: eigenclass not extensible ?
199623 06/06/30 01:59:50 [roger.johansson] system command and silent output?
199624 06/06/30 02:05:01 [logancapaldo gm] Re: system command and silent output?
199625 06/06/30 02:09:18 [zimba.tm gmail.] Re: eigenclass not extensible ? -------------------------
199626 06/06/30 02:10:08 [jim weirichhous] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199627 06/06/30 02:14:41 [roger.johansson] Re: system command and silent output?
199628 06/06/30 02:23:40 [logancapaldo gm] Re: Arrays, symbols and association - looking for better idiom
199629 06/06/30 02:57:32 [sam.s.kong gmai] Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199630 06/06/30 03:05:52 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199631 06/06/30 03:11:55 [kevin.clark gma] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199632 06/06/30 03:13:12 [kevin.clark gma] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199633 06/06/30 03:20:48 [sam.s.kong gmai] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199634 06/06/30 03:26:31 [vjoel path.berk] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199635 06/06/30 03:28:50 [steve.debaun se] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199636 06/06/30 03:34:53 [vjoel path.berk] Re: << for Hash?
199637 06/06/30 03:59:35 [dstrelau gmail.] Re: << for Hash?
199638 06/06/30 05:06:45 [shortcutter goo] Re: while modifiers have a scoping bug?!
199639 06/06/30 05:09:14 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: << for Hash?
199640 06/06/30 05:10:01 [shortcutter goo] Re: XML in ruby
199641 06/06/30 05:13:49 [urban bettong.n] [ANN] Munich.rb -- User Group Meeting in Munich, Germany
199642 06/06/30 05:24:29 [sam.s.kong gmai] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199643 06/06/30 05:25:38 [drbrain segment] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199644 06/06/30 05:28:25 [ara.t.howard no] Re: << for Hash?
199645 06/06/30 05:33:23 [sambient gmail.] Re: Sorting arrays
199646 06/06/30 05:38:54 [dstrelau gmail.] Re: << for Hash?
199647 06/06/30 06:09:51 [sambient gmail.] Re: Sorting arrays
199648 06/06/30 06:16:26 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: << for Hash?
199649 06/06/30 06:25:18 [lanny canczech.] Gems not found - what is the standard
199650 06/06/30 06:29:06 [halostatue gmai] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard -------------------------
199651 06/06/30 06:43:10 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199652 06/06/30 06:46:34 [halostatue gmai] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199653 06/06/30 06:57:54 [chneukirchen gm] Re: remove all illegal chars form string
199654 06/06/30 07:06:29 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199655 06/06/30 07:10:09 [james grayprodu] Re: remove all illegal chars form string
199656 06/06/30 07:24:11 [tbray textualit] Oniguruma & unicode?
199657 06/06/30 07:38:47 [jim weirichhous] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199658 06/06/30 07:42:33 [james grayprodu] Re: Sorting arrays
199659 06/06/30 07:49:16 [vjoel path.berk] Re: << for Hash?
199660 06/06/30 08:04:03 [ara.t.howard no] Re: << for Hash?
199661 06/06/30 08:04:29 [strobel secure.] Re: Unicode roadmap?
199662 06/06/30 08:14:54 [headspin gmail.] Re: Oniguruma & unicode?
199663 06/06/30 08:21:37 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199664 06/06/30 08:31:13 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199665 06/06/30 08:53:32 [sambient gmail.] Re: Sorting arrays
199666 06/06/30 09:07:18 [vjoel path.berk] Re: [ANN] na_str-0.0.0 : combining narray with mmap for persistant numerical data
199667 06/06/30 09:36:13 [ara.t.howard no] Re: [ANN] na_str-0.0.0 : combining narray with mmap for persistant numerical data
199668 06/06/30 09:43:11 [ara.t.howard no] Re: [ANN] na_str-0.0.0 : combining narray with mmap for persistant numerical data
199669 06/06/30 09:44:56 [ng johnwlong.co] [ANN] Radiant CMS 0.5 - Grindstone
199670 06/06/30 09:50:34 [rubyfan gmail.c] Re: flexible graph library - sans hash
199671 06/06/30 10:31:30 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: Huge performance gap
199672 06/06/30 10:32:47 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: Ruby Recursion
199673 06/06/30 10:32:58 [vshepelev imho.] Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199674 06/06/30 11:28:57 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199675 06/06/30 11:47:45 [vshepelev imho.] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle -------------------------
199676 06/06/30 11:52:42 [halostatue gmai] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199677 06/06/30 11:59:16 [vshepelev imho.] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199678 06/06/30 12:28:30 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199679 06/06/30 12:30:02 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199680 06/06/30 12:36:03 [vshepelev imho.] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199681 06/06/30 13:18:46 [john.baylor gma] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199682 06/06/30 13:24:32 [vshepelev imho.] Re: Ruby thread feat. win32 message cycle
199683 06/06/30 13:46:02 [uncutstone sina] Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199684 06/06/30 13:49:06 [satish.talim gm] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199685 06/06/30 14:08:14 [danielbaird gma] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199686 06/06/30 14:38:35 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199687 06/06/30 14:41:10 [vshepelev imho.] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199688 06/06/30 14:47:37 [alex blackkettl] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199689 06/06/30 14:51:09 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199690 06/06/30 15:20:26 [robmnl gmail.co] Re: IRB, Windows and International Keyboards
199691 06/06/30 15:26:42 [zedshaw zedshaw] Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199692 06/06/30 15:31:47 [danielbaird gma] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199693 06/06/30 15:41:54 [alex blackkettl] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199694 06/06/30 15:44:44 [grzm seespotcod] Re: [Rails] Re: [Mongrel] Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199695 06/06/30 15:47:03 [uncutstone sina] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guidelin
199696 06/06/30 16:02:43 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199697 06/06/30 16:05:11 [max sparkymat.n] Periodic retrieval fo stdout
199698 06/06/30 16:26:32 [hramrach centru] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199699 06/06/30 16:29:13 [hal9000 hyperme] Re: TurboVision port ?
199700 06/06/30 16:51:49 [erikveen gmail.] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release -------------------------
199701 06/06/30 17:12:33 [omerraviv barak] Re: Symbol#to_proc is just so beautiful
199702 06/06/30 17:13:04 [shortcutter goo] Re: Sorting arrays
199703 06/06/30 18:07:03 [omerraviv barak] Re: Symbol#to_proc is just so beautiful
199704 06/06/30 18:08:51 [pbattley gmail.] Re: Huge performance gap
199705 06/06/30 18:31:52 [transfire gmail] Re: Symbol#to_proc is just so beautiful
199706 06/06/30 18:47:26 [pedrocr gmail.c] Re: XML in ruby
199707 06/06/30 18:53:31 [transfire gmail] Prime mark for method wrapping
199708 06/06/30 18:55:07 [chneukirchen gm] Re: What do we want to add to RubyForge (was: RubyForge in Ruby?)
199709 06/06/30 19:22:53 [transfire gmail] [RubyGems] Rational about the Gem package format?
199710 06/06/30 19:56:24 [semmons99 gmail] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199711 06/06/30 20:10:40 [kevin.clark gma] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199712 06/06/30 20:51:39 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Symbol#to_proc is just so beautiful
199713 06/06/30 20:57:13 [the.mindstorm.m] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199714 06/06/30 21:11:34 [hutch recursive] Re: REXML and Excel XML :)
199715 06/06/30 21:21:11 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199716 06/06/30 21:54:31 [transfire gmail] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199717 06/06/30 22:13:13 [ara.t.howard no] Re: Periodic retrieval fo stdout
199718 06/06/30 22:29:32 [tim.pease gmail] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199719 06/06/30 22:32:06 [schapht gmail.c] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199720 06/06/30 22:38:05 [james grayprodu] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199721 06/06/30 22:40:12 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199722 06/06/30 22:40:22 [wfroelich dbsno] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199723 06/06/30 22:47:46 [james grayprodu] [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199724 06/06/30 23:04:01 [strobel secure.] Re: Debian packaging policy
199725 06/06/30 23:20:22 [transfire gmail] Re: Debian packaging policy -------------------------
199726 06/06/30 23:33:07 [alder.green gma] Useful inconcistency in calling foo vs. foo= private methods.
199727 06/06/30 23:45:08 [ara.t.howard no] Re: Useful inconcistency in calling foo vs. foo= private methods.
199728 06/07/01 00:44:17 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199729 06/07/01 00:46:54 [james grayprodu] Re: Sorting arrays
199730 06/07/01 01:07:58 [sambient gmail.] Order of precedence
199731 06/07/01 01:27:28 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield?
199732 06/07/01 01:45:21 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199733 06/07/01 01:45:44 [asbradbury tekc] Re: TurboVision port ?
199734 06/07/01 01:47:44 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: [RubyGems] Rational about the Gem package format?
199735 06/07/01 02:36:19 [schapht gmail.c] Re: Order of precedence
199736 06/07/01 02:57:15 [pollak gmail.co] Re: Reflection brakes encapsulation
199737 06/07/01 03:21:39 [halostatue gmai] Re: Order of precedence
199738 06/07/01 03:32:53 [james grayprodu] Re: Order of precedence
199739 06/07/01 04:21:48 [Rob AgileConsul] Re: Order of precedence
199740 06/07/01 04:23:35 [ara.t.howard no] Re: Order of precedence
199741 06/07/01 04:35:08 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199742 06/07/01 04:40:30 [logancapaldo gm] Re: Order of precedence
199743 06/07/01 04:41:15 [james.britt gma] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guidelin
199744 06/07/01 04:52:04 [halostatue gmai] Re: [RubyGems] Rational about the Gem package format?
199745 06/07/01 04:58:03 [vjoel path.berk] Re: Order of precedence
199746 06/07/01 06:41:44 [jupp gmx.de ] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199747 06/07/01 06:46:20 [drbrain segment] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199748 06/07/01 06:47:31 [mfp acm.org ] Re: [RubyGems] Rational about the Gem package format?
199749 06/07/01 06:47:47 [patrick pkspenc] Re: Forcing some code to run at the end of tests
199750 06/07/01 07:56:56 [sambient gmail.] Re: Order of precedence -------------------------
199751 06/07/01 08:07:51 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199752 06/07/01 08:19:05 [matthew.moss.co] Re: Order of precedence
199753 06/07/01 08:28:45 [bmoelk brainend] Re: Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199754 06/07/01 09:15:18 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Reflection brakes encapsulation
199755 06/07/01 09:26:10 [sambient gmail.] Re: Order of precedence
199756 06/07/01 09:26:21 [mattpsullivan y] Re: Order of precedence
199757 06/07/01 09:27:14 [john.baylor gma] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85) - not a spoiler, a test harness
199758 06/07/01 09:27:41 [nseckar gmail.c] Re: Order of precedence
199759 06/07/01 09:34:36 [gene.tani gmail] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199760 06/07/01 09:50:39 [gene.tani gmail] Re: Reflection brakes encapsulation
199761 06/07/01 09:50:51 [ara.t.howard no] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199762 06/07/01 09:50:55 [lanny canczech.] Re: Gems not found - what is the standard
199763 06/07/01 09:57:18 [martin snowplow] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199764 06/07/01 09:57:40 [Eric.Armstrong ] Re: Where to find Ruby code idiom, is there a style guideline
199765 06/07/01 09:58:02 [steven lumos.us] Re: Order of precedence
199766 06/07/01 09:58:07 [jmg3000 gmail.c] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199767 06/07/01 09:58:28 [vcivelek yahoo.] Puzzled?
199768 06/07/01 09:58:41 [zedshaw zedshaw] [ANN] Mongrel 0.3.13.3 -- Ruby Licensed Release
199769 06/07/01 09:59:04 [vcivelek yahoo.] Puzzled on the MatchData
199770 06/07/01 09:59:06 [john.baylor gma] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199771 06/07/01 09:59:17 [meadori gmail.c] Re: Order of precedence
199772 06/07/01 09:59:30 [james grayprodu] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199773 06/07/01 09:59:43 [vcivelek yahoo.] Re: Puzzled on the MatchData
199774 06/07/01 09:59:49 [ml.chibbs gmail] Re: [Rails] Time To Pick the Mongrel BUGS Mascot!
199775 06/07/01 10:00:12 [the.mindstorm.m] Re: Is a block converted to a Proc object before yield? -------------------------
199776 06/07/01 10:00:34 [the.mindstorm.m] Re: Forcing some code to run at the end of tests
199777 06/07/01 10:00:47 [runner berkeley] Taking Control of Un-handled Exceptions
199778 06/07/01 10:01:47 [bitdoger2 yahoo] can require 'date' be used in irb
199779 06/07/01 10:01:56 [guslist free.fr] Re: << for Hash?
199780 06/07/01 10:05:02 [kevin.clark gma] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199781 06/07/01 10:07:55 [akchizar gmail.] Re: Puzzled?
199782 06/07/01 10:27:54 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: [ANN] mkrf 0.1.0 released
199783 06/07/01 10:32:53 [djberg96 gmail.] Problem with gems, Windows, C extension
199784 06/07/01 10:36:26 [cohen.jeff gmai] Re: ANN: RubyGems 0.9.0 Release
199785 06/07/01 11:10:55 [minkoo.seo gmai] Differences between irb and ruby.
199786 06/07/01 11:20:46 [halostatue gmai] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199787 06/07/01 11:56:23 [botp delmonte-p] Re: [QUIZ] C-Style Ints (#85)
199788 06/07/01 12:04:53 [logancapaldo gm] Re: can require 'date' be used in irb
199789 06/07/01 12:06:06 [kevin.clark gma] Re: can require 'date' be used in irb
199790 06/07/01 12:09:33 [ezmobius gmail.] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199791 06/07/01 13:15:57 [minkoo.seo gmai] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199792 06/07/01 13:19:24 [minkoo.seo gmai] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199793 06/07/01 13:30:19 [ezmobius gmail.] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199794 06/07/01 13:32:54 [logancapaldo gm] Re: Differences between irb and ruby.
199795 06/07/01 13:59:24 [mailinglists sc] Re: can require 'date' be used in irb
199796 06/07/01 14:08:24 [satish.talim gm] Java to Ruby
199797 06/07/01 14:41:49 [drbrain segment] Re: Taking Control of Un-handled Exceptions
199798 06/07/01 14:46:52 [drbrain segment] Re: can require 'date' be used in irb
199799 06/07/01 14:51:44 [curi curi.us ] Re: Java to Ruby
199800 06/07/01 15:24:27 [x2egard yahoo.c] Re: [ANN] Mongrel 0.3.13.3 -- Ruby Licensed Release -------------------------