ruby_talk (104601-104800)

 < ^ > 
104601 04/06/26 06:38:04 [ptkwt aracnet.c] OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104602 04/06/26 06:38:04 [cc1 cec.wustl.e] Questions about SWIG, Ruby/DL and embedding calls to ruby within C++ Code
104603 04/06/26 06:49:01 [lyle.johnson gm] Re: Questions about SWIG, Ruby/DL and embedding calls to ruby within C++ Code
104604 04/06/26 07:12:58 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104605 04/06/26 07:13:08 [djberg96 hotmai] Re: Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names?
104606 04/06/26 07:18:05 [sdate everestkc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104607 04/06/26 07:53:04 [ptkwt aracnet.c] Re: Blocking SOD in clients
104608 04/06/26 08:08:03 [ptkwt aracnet.c] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104609 04/06/26 08:08:04 [quixoticsycopha] gems with compiled extensions
104610 04/06/26 08:38:51 [maki rubycolor.] ruby-dev summary 23690-23762
104611 04/06/26 09:16:41 [mailinglists sc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104612 04/06/26 09:22:57 [bg-rubytalk inf] "attr" like functions
104613 04/06/26 09:30:51 [Meino.Cramer gm] List of all operators, keywords and such
104614 04/06/26 09:37:35 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: List of all operators, keywords and such
104615 04/06/26 10:13:05 [sdate everestkc] Re: List of all operators, keywords and such
104616 04/06/26 10:14:02 [jm transact.com] replacement for amavisd
104617 04/06/26 10:23:54 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again
104618 04/06/26 10:33:03 [sdate everestkc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104619 04/06/26 10:36:32 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names?
104620 04/06/26 10:38:03 [sdate everestkc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104621 04/06/26 10:54:36 [tom infoether.c] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104622 04/06/26 10:55:01 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: List of all operators, keywords and such
104623 04/06/26 11:07:12 [matt technoroni] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again
104624 04/06/26 11:23:08 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again
104625 04/06/26 11:58:59 [matt technoroni] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again -------------------------
104626 04/06/26 13:12:30 [bitserf gmail.c] Re: "attr" like functions
104627 04/06/26 13:34:21 [Meino.Cramer gm] Thank you ! :) Was Re: List of all operators, keywords and such
104628 04/06/26 14:20:02 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again
104629 04/06/26 14:24:41 [matt technoroni] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again
104630 04/06/26 14:35:56 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names?
104631 04/06/26 17:28:03 [surrender_it rc] Re: replacement for amavisd
104632 04/06/26 17:33:02 [surrender_it rc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104633 04/06/26 17:56:04 [jean_hugues_rob] Re: Blocking SOD in clients
104634 04/06/26 18:26:02 [jean_hugues_rob] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104635 04/06/26 18:39:08 [jean_hugues_rob] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104636 04/06/26 20:19:14 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104637 04/06/26 21:05:02 [Meino.Cramer gm] SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104638 04/06/26 22:23:03 [ahoward noaa.go] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104639 04/06/26 23:58:13 [rich lithinos.c] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104640 04/06/27 00:57:06 [Meino.Cramer gm] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104641 04/06/27 01:42:25 [Meino.Cramer gm] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104642 04/06/27 02:14:11 [rich lithinos.c] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104643 04/06/27 02:18:02 [leefranks bluey] Romainian Teenagers Raped. Banned Photos. 1721
104644 04/06/27 02:28:06 [behrends cse.ms] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104645 04/06/27 03:13:03 [usenet andreas-] Problem with mkmf on OS X
104646 04/06/27 03:13:53 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104647 04/06/27 06:33:04 [NoOne Nowhere.c] Problem with FxRuby sample "Dilbert.rb"
104648 04/06/27 08:46:43 [gsinclair soyab] Re: SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs"
104649 04/06/27 09:03:02 [" *( SPAM )*opt] Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104650 04/06/27 09:30:54 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program -------------------------
104651 04/06/27 09:37:24 [gsinclair soyab] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104652 04/06/27 09:48:01 [surrender_it rc] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104653 04/06/27 09:53:01 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104654 04/06/27 10:18:03 [" (nil_spam)opt] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104655 04/06/27 10:44:13 [rich lithinos.c] PragProg Interview on O'Reilly Network
104656 04/06/27 10:47:41 [gavin refinery.] [ANN] Springz 1.0
104657 04/06/27 11:13:02 [g_ogata optusho] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104658 04/06/27 11:47:29 [jimm io.com ] [ANN] midilib initial release
104659 04/06/27 11:58:01 [sdate everestkc] Re: [ANN] Springz 1.0
104660 04/06/27 15:37:07 [gavin refinery.] Re: [ANN] Springz 1.0
104661 04/06/27 15:53:01 [sdate everestkc] Re: [ANN] Springz 1.0
104662 04/06/27 17:08:01 [NoOne Nowhere.c] Re: List of all operators, keywords and such
104663 04/06/27 17:41:16 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104664 04/06/27 17:42:42 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Problem with mkmf on OS X
104665 04/06/27 19:04:27 [NoOne Nowhere.c] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104666 04/06/27 19:06:29 [lists zara.6.is] running ala Perl's strict
104667 04/06/27 19:06:39 [lists zara.6.is] different safe levels, which one to choose?
104668 04/06/27 19:09:51 [lists zara.6.is] rounding to n decimal digits
104669 04/06/27 20:18:00 [usenet andreas-] Re: Problem with mkmf on OS X
104670 04/06/27 20:43:10 [kristof vleeuwe] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104671 04/06/27 20:49:46 [mailinglists sc] Re: PragProg Interview on O'Reilly Network
104672 04/06/27 21:08:00 [kristof vleeuwe] Re: Blocking SOD in clients
104673 04/06/27 22:23:03 [csshsh structbe] accessing a subclass
104674 04/06/27 22:43:02 [ralph dolphy.pa] Newbie: How to model this?
104675 04/06/27 22:48:00 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program -------------------------
104676 04/06/27 23:33:02 [malteDELETETHIS] Re: Newbie: How to model this?
104677 04/06/27 23:33:02 [malteDELETETHIS] Re: accessing a subclass
104678 04/06/27 23:43:07 [djberg96 hotmai] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104679 04/06/27 23:47:59 [piir earthlink.] Re: rounding to n decimal digits
104680 04/06/27 23:58:00 [piir earthlink.] Re: rounding to n decimal digits
104681 04/06/28 00:08:00 [martindemello y] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104682 04/06/28 00:18:00 [martindemello y] Re: Writing UNIX 'wc' program
104683 04/06/28 00:23:45 [bob.news gmx.ne] Re: accessing a subclass
104684 04/06/28 00:38:43 [nobu.nokada sof] Re: Problem with mkmf on OS X
104685 04/06/28 00:50:43 [mcl andsoforth.] Re: rounding to n decimal digits
104686 04/06/28 01:04:15 [caili cdgwbn.co] Re: rounding to n decimal digits
104687 04/06/28 01:48:00 [usenet andreas-] Re: Problem with mkmf on OS X
104688 04/06/28 01:51:57 [mneumann ntecs.] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104689 04/06/28 02:01:07 [mailinglists sc] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104690 04/06/28 02:03:28 [jamesUNDERBARb ] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104691 04/06/28 02:28:07 [asdf asdf.com ] FXRuby + Unit Tests
104692 04/06/28 02:39:05 [billk cts.com ] Re: FXRuby + Unit Tests
104693 04/06/28 03:31:49 [lists zara.6.is] Re: rounding to n decimal digits
104694 04/06/28 03:48:43 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104695 04/06/28 04:24:27 [stopsod yahoo.c] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104696 04/06/28 04:51:11 [vjoel PATH.Berk] Re: accessing a subclass
104697 04/06/28 04:57:43 [msparshatt yaho] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104698 04/06/28 05:33:51 [stopsod yahoo.c] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104699 04/06/28 05:44:16 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104700 04/06/28 06:20:04 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful? -------------------------
104701 04/06/28 06:48:05 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104702 04/06/28 06:56:16 [marick visiblew] Re: "Litte Ruby" book
104703 04/06/28 06:56:16 [marick visiblew] Re: "Litte Ruby" book
104704 04/06/28 07:03:27 [mghall.No Spam.] Re: [ANN] midilib initial release
104705 04/06/28 07:07:20 [jimm io.com ] [ANN] midilib 0.8.1 released
104706 04/06/28 07:13:28 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104707 04/06/28 07:22:08 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104708 04/06/28 07:24:50 [jimm io.com ] Re: [ANN] midilib initial release
104709 04/06/28 07:28:22 [jamesUNDERBARb ] Re: "Litte Ruby" book
104710 04/06/28 07:43:49 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104711 04/06/28 08:07:11 [batsman.geo yah] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104712 04/06/28 08:08:12 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104713 04/06/28 08:33:00 [sera fhwang.net] [ANN] Lafcadio 0.4.0
104714 04/06/28 08:53:39 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104715 04/06/28 09:02:29 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104716 04/06/28 09:30:23 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104717 04/06/28 10:37:59 [thefruits toons] I got pics of Bart making Maggie Simpson PREGNANT
104718 04/06/28 10:45:06 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104719 04/06/28 11:29:50 [halostatue gmai] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104720 04/06/28 11:40:45 [gsinclair soyab] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104721 04/06/28 12:33:17 [william.hamilto] Can't even configure ruby1.8.1, eruby1.0.5
104722 04/06/28 13:03:29 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104723 04/06/28 13:57:34 [john.carter tai] Re: N Dimensional Hash?
104724 04/06/28 14:07:13 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104725 04/06/28 14:08:53 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful? -------------------------
104726 04/06/28 14:14:34 [eyez illuzionz.] Re: Can't even configure ruby1.8.1, eruby1.0.5
104727 04/06/28 14:48:59 [jm transact.com] does soap have problems with structs?
104728 04/06/28 14:57:59 [god x-nc.net ] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104729 04/06/28 15:03:03 [gsinclair soyab] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104730 04/06/28 16:27:58 [ralph dolphy.pa] Re: Newbie: How to model this?
104731 04/06/28 17:33:26 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104732 04/06/28 17:36:56 [horacio.lopez g] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104733 04/06/28 18:08:01 [surrender_it rc] Re: [ANN] Lafcadio 0.4.0
104734 04/06/28 18:18:02 [surrender_it rc] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104735 04/06/28 18:18:02 [surrender_it rc] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104736 04/06/28 18:27:08 [horacio.lopez g] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104737 04/06/28 18:47:58 [surrender_it rc] (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104738 04/06/28 18:52:57 [surrender_it rc] Maybe IRB Bug?
104739 04/06/28 19:03:16 [batsman.geo yah] Re: Maybe IRB Bug?
104740 04/06/28 19:18:03 [surrender_it rc] Re: Maybe IRB Bug?
104741 04/06/28 19:28:03 [piir earthlink.] How to run ipconfig in W2k?
104742 04/06/28 19:31:53 [chneukirchen gm] Re: How to run ipconfig in W2k?
104743 04/06/28 19:32:57 [piir earthlink.] get same info as ipconfig?
104744 04/06/28 19:32:57 [surrender_it rc] Re: How to run ipconfig in W2k?
104745 04/06/28 19:35:38 [lyle.johnson gm] Re: OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled?
104746 04/06/28 19:55:17 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: get same info as ipconfig?
104747 04/06/28 20:03:04 [piir earthlink.] Ruby Newbie: What if @ symbol is not used?
104748 04/06/28 20:13:53 [eule space.ch ] Re: [ANN] Lafcadio 0.4.0
104749 04/06/28 20:27:59 [cyclists nc.rr.] Re: Ruby Newbie: What if @ symbol is not used?
104750 04/06/28 20:38:01 [bob.news gmx.ne] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly -------------------------
104751 04/06/28 21:02:59 [piir earthlink.] Win32API.new( dllname, procname?, importArray?, export?)
104752 04/06/28 21:10:43 [JRoshan blr.cog] Re: "Litte Ruby" book
104753 04/06/28 21:27:58 [surrender_it rc] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104754 04/06/28 21:45:56 [patrick hexane.] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104755 04/06/28 22:03:10 [darrenjones rcn] Lesbian Fetish Movie Clip
104756 04/06/28 22:35:40 [JRoshan blr.cog] Re: How to run ipconfig in W2k?
104757 04/06/28 22:43:08 [bob.news gmx.ne] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104758 04/06/28 23:33:07 [ahoward noaa.go] Re: Ruby Newbie: What if @ symbol is not used?
104759 04/06/28 23:58:05 [djberg96 hotmai] [ANN] sys-cpu 0.5.0
104760 04/06/29 00:14:59 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104761 04/06/29 00:19:59 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104762 04/06/29 00:21:12 [sstephenson gma] Re: get same info as ipconfig?
104763 04/06/29 00:25:13 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104764 04/06/29 00:33:14 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104765 04/06/29 00:54:48 [marick visiblew] Re: "Litte Ruby" book
104766 04/06/29 00:58:22 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104767 04/06/29 01:27:05 [halostatue gmai] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104768 04/06/29 01:28:02 [sera fhwang.net] Re: [ANN] Lafcadio 0.4.0
104769 04/06/29 01:48:26 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104770 04/06/29 01:50:19 [sean celsoft.co] [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104771 04/06/29 01:52:44 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104772 04/06/29 02:06:11 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104773 04/06/29 02:10:48 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104774 04/06/29 02:13:28 [rcoder gmail.co] Re: "attr" like functions
104775 04/06/29 02:14:56 [hal9000 hyperme] Re: Is it considered Harmful? -------------------------
104776 04/06/29 02:15:31 [phubuh phubuh.o] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104777 04/06/29 02:19:35 [halostatue gmai] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104778 04/06/29 02:42:57 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104779 04/06/29 02:44:50 [rohitlodha hotw] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104780 04/06/29 02:53:01 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104781 04/06/29 03:02:57 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104782 04/06/29 03:04:21 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104783 04/06/29 03:12:57 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104784 04/06/29 03:12:58 [sean celsoft.co] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104785 04/06/29 03:18:43 [sean celsoft.co] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104786 04/06/29 03:51:20 [emiel il.fontys] (forw) [emiel@il.fontys.nl: ruby-quota resurrection?]
104787 04/06/29 04:09:37 [billk cts.com ] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104788 04/06/29 04:13:24 [surrender_it rc] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104789 04/06/29 04:17:57 [surrender_it rc] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104790 04/06/29 04:22:15 [koen.vervloesem] Re: Can't even configure ruby1.8.1, eruby1.0.5
104791 04/06/29 04:22:27 [andrew walrond.] system() shouldn't throw exceptions, should it?
104792 04/06/29 04:25:20 [zdennis mktec.c] debian ruby libraries
104793 04/06/29 04:32:58 [surrender_it rc] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104794 04/06/29 04:42:57 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104795 04/06/29 04:43:34 [sean celsoft.co] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104796 04/06/29 04:52:57 [surrender_it rc] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104797 04/06/29 04:57:56 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful?
104798 04/06/29 05:01:39 [andrew walrond.] Re: system() shouldn't throw exceptions, should it?
104799 04/06/29 05:02:56 [flgr ccan.de ] Re: (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly
104800 04/06/29 05:13:00 [sean celsoft.co] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful? -------------------------