From ruby-math-admin@ruby-lang.org Thu Apr 11 19:38:42 2002 Received: from tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.115]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id TAA25567; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:42 +0900 Received: (from root@localhost) by tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g3BAcdt63064; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ruby-math-admin@ruby-lang.org) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3av) with ESMTP id g3BAccW63057; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:38 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ruby-math-admin@ruby-lang.org) Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org (helium.ruby-lang.org [210.251.121.214]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3BAcb562102; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:37 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ruby-math-admin@ruby-lang.org) Received: from hoyogw.ruby-lang.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B676929; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:33 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:38:28 +0900 From: Shin-ichiro HARA Reply-To: ruby-math@ruby-lang.org Subject: [ruby-math:00685] Re: complex#/ problem To: ruby-math@ruby-lang.org Message-Id: <4.3.2-J.20020411193440.02e7ab60@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <200204101043.TAA04401.keiju@ishitsuka.com> References: <4.3.2-J.20020410184638.03568340@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp> X-ML-Name: ruby-math X-Mail-Count: 00685 X-MLServer: fml [fml 3.0pl#17]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-math-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2-J X-Sender: sinara@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp X-Authentication-Warning: blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp: Host book.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.48.99] claimed to be BOOK.blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Lines: 15 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 原です。 >けいじゅ@日本ラショナルソフトウェアです. > >やっぱりこれって Int/Int -> Rational と連動するんじゃないかなあ。 > >かなぁ... じゃなくてぇ. でも, 原さんは int/int->int派だったはずでしたが いや、だから今回の案には私は反対なのです。 でも、間違いがないように、という事と、Ratinal 組み込みをにらんで、 というのなら、「複合型の数クラスに対しては必要に応じて Rational を使う」というのに賛成しちゃおうかな、、、(^^;