32121-33227

31974-32878 subjects 32337-33012

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3798] ruby 1.9.2 + OpenSSL 1.0.0.a on Windows 64 test hang .....
32121 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3798 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[Ruby 1.9-Backport#3798] ruby 1.9.2 + OpenSSL 1.0.0.a on Windows 64 test hang .....
32124 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3798 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.8-Bug#3788] URI cannot parse IPv6 addresses propertly
32128 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3788 has been updated by Adam Majer.
32258 [akr@fs j. rg] I think adding a method is a good design.
+ 32264 [darix@op ns ] doesnt that mean you will need to fix all of the users of the function?
| 32325 [akr@fs j. rg] All occurrences of URI::Generic#host should be examined.
+ 32333 [naruse@ai em] I agree with akr's patch; but URI#host should have a description that
  32334 [akr@fs j. rg] I see.

[Ruby 1.9.1-Backport#3395] Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a
32129 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3395 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3683] getgrnam on computer with NIS group (+)?
32130 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3683 has been updated by Rocky Bernstein.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3780] RDoc::Parser.binary? broken for some utf8 files longer than 1024 bytes
32134 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3780 has been updated by Stephen Bannasch.

[Ruby-Bug#3802][Open] freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll
32135 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3802: freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll

[Ruby-Bug#3803][Open] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN/ROUND_HALF_EVEN behave incorrectly (disagree with JRuby and the rest of the world)
32136 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3803: BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN/ROUND_HALF_EVEN behave incorrectly (disagree with JRuby and the rest of the world)

[Ruby 1.9-Backport#3395] Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a
32137 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3395 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3793] No test for OpenSSL::PKCS12
32138 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3793 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3804][Open] ruby crashed while running spork
32139 [redmine@ru y] Backport #3804: ruby crashed while running spork

[Ruby 1.8.7-Bug#3284][Closed] OpenSSL problem with 1.8.7
32140 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3284 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby-Bug#3309] net/http calls leak memory and file handles in windows
32144 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3309 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.8.7-Bug#969][Rejected] EOFError when doing net/http post with large body
32150 [redmine@ru y] Issue #969 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

Making custom_lambda() work
32154 [judofyr@gm i] A tiny suggestion for how we could make it possible to call lambdas
+ 32159 [now@bi wi se] I realize that I”Ēm breaking the thread, but why is the calling of
| + 32163 [judofyr@gm i] When I think about it, I agree with you, but that's probably because
| + 32171 [jballanc@gm ] Well, personally my reason for wanting to do this is mildly subversive. =
| | 32192 [matz@ru y- a] class Worker
| | 32194 [jballanc@gm ] Yes, this is one of the reasons I would very much like to have the () =
| | 32199 [matz@ru y- a] So tell me the difference between method objects and lambdas that make
| + 32340 [mail@ti co n] Lambda's feel a bit like second class citizens because of this. I
|   + 32342 [now@bi wi se] That”Ēs a very personal opinion.  To me, lambdas in Ruby are, like
|   + 32379 [gwtmp01@ma .] I think the cognitive dissonance you are describing with regard to
|     32380 [jim.weirich@] I tend to agree with this.  Allowing () to invoke lambdas would
|     32381 [judofyr@gm i] Of course, if you read the proposal again, you'll see that it doesn't
|     32391 [gwtmp01@ma .] I think you are still stuck with an ambiguity that can't be resolved
|     32392 [judofyr@gm i] Technically, it's possible. The parser keeps a list of the local
+ 32186 [matz@ru y- a] I once have made a patch to the parser to allow (1), but I gave up,

Can we convert the standard library to gems?
32156 [james@gr ys ] I guess I'm not understanding.  What are the minuses of Ruby shipping =
+ 32161 [darix@op ns ] well for one ... we would kind of need 2 directories for said gems imho.
| + 32166 [james@gr ys ] Why?
| | 32173 [darix@op ns ] because a ruby 1.9.3 describes a feature set which includes the stdlib.
| | + 32174 [luislavena@g] While this could be a problem, is not precisely any new one we had encounte=
| | + 32176 [james@gr ys ] shipping
| | | 32177 [darix@op ns ] why would this be useful? why should we make it so easy to shoot
| | | + 32178 [james@gr ys ] stdlib.
| | | | 32179 [darix@op ns ] then you could stuff call "gem uninstall --stdlib syck" and should get a
| | | + 32217 [ryand-ruby@z] Why would we presume to understand the users' needs better than they?
| | |   32224 [james@gr ys ] And I thought Ruby's policy has always been to trust us with the sharp =
| | + 32249 [aaron@te de ] ho.
| |   + 32252 [luislavena@g] The always hidden "apt-get install ruby-full"
| |   | 32272 [naruse@ai em] At least ext/json should be a gem in some way on 1.9.3.
| |   + 32278 [lucas@lu as ] This was true in the past, but is no longer the case.
| |     + 32299 [aaron@te de ] pping
| |     + 32311 [halostatue@g] I just dealt with a rather painful problem on Ubuntu 10.04 because of
| |       + 32313 [lucas@lu as ] Ubuntu update policy for stable releases is rather strict, and it is not
| |       | 32319 [halostatue@g] Replying off-list, as this is further off-topic to this discussion.
| |       + 32314 [huard.elise@] ok, this is not exactly on topic, but I'm using Debian and Ubuntu a
| + 32215 [ryand-ruby@z] imho.
+ 32162 [mame@ts .n .] Thanks for creating a new thread so quickly :-)
| + 32167 [james@gr ys ] I'm not sure I completely understand this issue, but it definitely =
| + 32195 [aaron@te de ] ith a set of blessed gems? ?I can't think of any.
| | 32208 [mame@ts .n .] I can't understand your point.
| | 32212 [aaron@te de ] People who use Ruby on managed environments.  For example, I pay for a
| | 32219 [naruse@ai em] y in
| + 32216 [ryand-ruby@z] I think it is still up to the library developers to do exactly what =
|   32229 [mame@ts .n .] Interesting.  The two announcements for freebsd itself and a port
|   + 32230 [darix@op ns ] debian regularly releases new installation medias that have the latest
|   + 32234 [drbrain@se m] Is there a reason this couldn't be automated for a ruby release so the =
|   | + 32239 [mame@ts .n .] Good point.  I never thought of that :-)  since I've seen Yugui
|   | + 32271 [naruse@ai em] lease tag is created and the .tar.gz and .gems are uploaded at the same tim=
|   + 32260 [ryand-ruby@z] whole
|   | + 32273 [naruse@ai em] "?
|   | + 32275 [shyouhei@ru ] I'm off today so sorry if I missed some mails.
|   | | 32293 [james@im j. ] Urabe,
|   | | 32316 [shyouhei@ru ] May I emphasize this again?  I think I'm not your enemy.
|   | | 32322 [jftucker@gm ] Excuse me, but (at least) I'm talking about a security issue.
|   | | 32335 [shyouhei@ru ] I'm at an airport back to my home so in short,
|   | | 32343 [james@im j. ] Well, what tool is needed? As I said earlier, we're all developers,
|   | | 32382 [shyouhei@ru ] This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
|   | | 32383 [james@im j. ] So you now have no blocking reason for not switching to gems?
|   | | 32393 [shyouhei@ru ] This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
|   | | 32396 [james@im j. ] OK, so i understand that the RM/core are OK with it. Yui - any
|   | | + 32397 [lucas@lu as ] [A] to also distribute libraries from the stdlib as external gems, while
|   | | | 32408 [eregontp@gm ] t this is
|   | | + 32399 [mame@ts .n .] I might fail to follow this discussion, but was Marcus's concern
|   | |   32400 [james@im j. ] I personally don't agree; ruby should be available but it's not always
|   | |   32401 [darix@op ns ] and how do you solve the requires part of my posting?
|   | |   + 32402 [james@im j. ] I don't believe the issue is as grave as you suggest. there's no
|   | |   | + 32411 [darix@op ns ] this is going to work well....
|   | |   | | 32412 [james@im j. ] I personally would prefer that stdlib were able to manage revisions by
|   | |   | | 32414 [lucas@lu as ] Wouldn't custom rubies and custom stdlibs give the impression that a
|   | |   | | + 32417 [ryand-ruby@z] You mean like debian/ubuntu have been doing for years on end? =
|   | |   | | | 32442 [lucas@lu as ] This is not true. From what I understand, you want to go much further
|   | |   | | + 32430 [halostatue@g] If other distributors started embracing RubyGems in the same way that
|   | |   | |   32431 [jftucker@gm ] Apple doesn't provide packages, they provide a filesystem snapshot. This =
|   | |   | |   + 32435 [hramrach@ce ] They sort of do provide packages, you just can't uninstall them. Makes
|   | |   | |   | 32438 [jftucker@gm ] This is not valid.
|   | |   | |   + 32441 [halostatue@g] is not valid.
|   | |   | |     + 32443 [jftucker@gm ] custom
|   | |   | |     | + 32444 [huard.elise@] s is not valid.
|   | |   | |     | + 32445 [halostatue@g] each a direction that will not introduce a slew of new problems. This area =
|   | |   | |     |   32446 [jftucker@gm ] the
|   | |   | |     + 32579 [meta@po ox c] Speaking of which...
|   | |   | + 32421 [darix@op ns ] ok I thought a bit more about your idea ... and it is not going to work.
|   | |   |   + 32423 [huard.elise@] - you could just reference a certain number of gems from ruby config
|   | |   |   | + 32424 [jballanc@gm ] it
|   | |   |   | | 32433 [jftucker@gm ] Standard Library "Blessed" gems could be retrieved by passing the =
|   | |   |   | + 32432 [jftucker@gm ] This is not true. Users will do `gem update` and shoot themselves in the =
|   | |   |   |   32436 [huard.elise@] foot. As one of the people who spends a lot of time on user support, I woul=
|   | |   |   |   32439 [jftucker@gm ] the foot. As one of the people who spends a lot of time on user support, =
|   | |   |   |   32440 [huard.elise@] e foot. As one of the people who spends a lot of time on user support, I wo=
|   | |   |   + 32437 [jftucker@gm ] it
|   | |   + 32416 [ryand-ruby@z] A gem dependency on the required gem will work just fine.
|   | |     32420 [darix@op ns ] how does my script find out which version was shipped with the distro?
|   | |     32434 [jftucker@gm ] Dir['dist/*.gem'].map { |f| f =3D~ =
|   | + 32295 [jftucker@gm ] harm than good by delaying fixes in order to coordinate full releases. =
|   |   + 32297 [luislavena@g] than good by delaying fixes in order to coordinate full releases. If ruby+=
|   |   | 32300 [jftucker@gm ] harm than good by delaying fixes in order to coordinate full releases. =
|   |   | 32301 [luislavena@g] t, it's really awful practice.
|   |   | 32302 [jftucker@gm ] not.
|   |   + 32298 [james@im j. ] This seems like what we are talking about.
|   |   + 32303 [v.ondruch@gm] All this discussion reminds to me Eclipse ecosystem. Once a year is
|   + 32270 [naruse@ai em] Separation of FreeBSD ports and pkgsrc is from the dependency to
+ 32242 [rogerdpack2@] ith a set of blessed gems? =A0I can't think of any.
  + 32245 [drbrain@se m] with a set of blessed gems?  I can't think of any.
  + 32247 [luislavena@g] that is not true, see required_ruby_version.
    32254 [rogerdpack2@] Well, not *entirely* true, apparently.
    + 32256 [luislavena@g] You're ignoring for a second that we are talking about Ruby 1.9 and
    + 32259 [ryand-ruby@z] I don't know about you, but I certainly don't want to maintain a single =
      32263 [code@je em e] home_run (my stdlib Date replacement) is written in C and works on both
      32276 [ryand-ruby@z] both

[Ruby-Bug#3802][Third Party's Issue] freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll
32158 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3802 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[Ruby-Bug#3802] freeaddrinfo not found in WS2_32.dll
32160 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3802 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3780][Assigned] RDoc::Parser.binary? broken for some utf8 files longer than 1024 bytes
32164 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3780 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3805][Open] Ruby generated gem specifications for bundled projects are incorrect
32165 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3805: Ruby generated gem specifications for bundled projects are inc=
32318 [nobu@ru y- a] Why does gem command try to install another rake, even when the
32326 [luislavena@g] AFAIK this has been how RubyGems behave for quite some time, and mimic

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3806][Open] bug report
32175 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3806: bug report

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3806][Rejected] bug report
32180 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3806 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3785][Rejected] unexpected Numeric#step behaviour
32181 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3785 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3805][Closed] Ruby generated gem specifications for bundled projects are incorrect
32182 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3805 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3478][Closed] Excruciatingly slow pathname implementation
32183 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3478 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3807][Open] Minor test/ruby/test_env.rb fix for OpenBSD
32184 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3807: Minor test/ruby/test_env.rb fix for OpenBSD

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3808][Open] Minor rubygems test fix to fix cases where :format_executable => true by default
32185 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3808: Minor rubygems test fix to fix cases where :format_executable =

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3807][Closed] Minor test/ruby/test_env.rb fix for OpenBSD
32196 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3807 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

Ruby 2.0 Wish-list?
32200 [rockyb@ru yf] Any plans for error messages in languages other than English?
32218 [matz@ru y- a] For application internationalization, you can use gettext, etc.
32226 [now@bi wi se] * Localized error messages are a lot more difficult to Google
32232 [mame@ts .n .] * it requires translation whenever new exception is introduced,
32253 [rockyb@ru yf] Thanks everyone for the comments.

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3809][Open] allow multiple set_trace_func() calls
32220 [redmine@ru y] Feature #3809: allow multiple set_trace_func() calls

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3622] Net::HTTP does not wait to send request body with Expect: 100-continue
32221 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3622 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3810][Open] Digest::Base.new causes segmentation fault
32231 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3810: Digest::Base.new causes segmentation fault

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3810][Closed] Digest::Base.new causes segmentation fault
32233 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3810 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3811][Open] Support SOL_SOCKET SO_PEERCRED socket option on OpenBSD
32240 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3811: Support SOL_SOCKET SO_PEERCRED socket option on OpenBSD

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3811][Closed] Support SOL_SOCKET SO_PEERCRED socket option on OpenBSD
32246 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3811 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

Replacing stdlib Date with C version
32248 [code@je em e] I've recently been working on a replacement for the stdlib Date class,
32265 [nobu@ru y- a] It's a problem.
+ 32266 [luislavena@g] I believe the tests are actually MSpec (from RubySpec compliance)
+ 32269 [code@je em e] Is it required to use the same marshalling format, or just to recognize
  32277 [nobu@ru y- a] The former.  We had already had made severe mistake about
  + 32280 [ryand-ruby@z] You can go halfway and convert them to minitest/spec.
  | 32286 [huard.elise@] The idea of a small ruby does sound appealing.
  + 32294 [code@je em e] OK, I can definitely change the marshalling format then.
  | 32312 [nobu@ru y- a] Agree.  Thanks, Ryan.
  | + 33220 [james@gr ys ] If we can address the compatibility issues, I think it's very hard to =
  | | 33221 [runrun@ru pa] This feels like a step backward. As nobu said, we have a native
  | | 33227 [code@je em e] home_run doesn't use floats much internally, and could probably be
  | + 33222 [luislavena@g] I believe you got my comments on home_run before, but going to comment here=
  | + 33225 [naruse@ai em] Make a ticket on Redmine and assign it to tadf.
  + 32296 [stephen.bann] Since you are proposing changes to Date it is important to have tests for new behavior also land in the rubyspecs repository ifthese changes are are made to Ruby so other VMs can support the same behavior.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3812][Open] (mswin|mingw) ENV[]= fails silently to set huge values
32250 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3812: (mswin|mingw) ENV[]=3D fails silently to set huge values
32261 [nobu@ru y- a] Thank you, but alloca is not safe for such huge values.  IIRC,

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3813][Open] Add Missing RLIMIT_ Constants to Process [Patch]
32262 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3813: Add Missing RLIMIT_ Constants to Process [Patch]
32324 [akr@fs j. rg] ux 2.6.32, `man 2 getrlimit` defines 16 RLIMIT_* constants. 1 of those is o=

[Ruby 1.8.7-Backport#3666] Backport of r26311 (Bug #2587)
32267 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3666 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

Receiving ruby-cvs with unified diff inline?
32279 [markus@fi ch] I've subscribed to ruby-cvs and was surprised that there's no diff as

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3815][Open] dl2 - DL::Function TYPE_DOUBLE packing/unpacking problem
32281 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3815: dl2 - DL::Function TYPE_DOUBLE packing/unpacking problem

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3815][Rejected] dl2 - DL::Function TYPE_DOUBLE packing/unpacking problem
32282 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3815 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3815][Open] dl2 - DL::Function TYPE_DOUBLE packing/unpacking problem
32283 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3815 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3817][Open] current ruby-openssl impl wrongly utilizes CRYPTO_EX_DATA in X509_STORE
32284 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3817: current ruby-openssl impl wrongly utilizes CRYPTO_EX_DATA in X509_STORE

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3815] dl2 - DL::Function TYPE_DOUBLE packing/unpacking problem
32285 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3815 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3622] Net::HTTP does not wait to send request body with Expect: 100-continue
32288 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3622 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.8-Feature#855] HTTP/1.1 fixes and other enhancements to webrick
32289 [redmine@ru y] Issue #855 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818][Open] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32290 [redmine@ru y] Backport #3818: Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3812] (mswin|mingw) ENV[]= fails silently to set huge values
32304 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3812 has been updated by Peter Weldon.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32305 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3812] (mswin|mingw) ENV[]= fails silently to set huge values
32306 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3812 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[Ruby 1.9-Feature#3622] Net::HTTP does not wait to send request body with Expect: 100-continue
32307 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3622 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32308 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Karl Baum.

Module.new and Class.new rdoc
32309 [ryand-ruby@z] May I commit?

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32310 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3812][Closed] (mswin|mingw) ENV[]= fails silently to set huge values
32315 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3812 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

Not using system Ruby on DEbian (was: Re:  Re: Can we convert the standard library to gems?)
32317 [markus@fi ch] I'm "totally in love" with Debian, primarily speaking as a server-side
32323 [jftucker@gm ] at
32336 [rick.denatal] ct that a very very unwise decision was made during the switch to gemcutter=
32338 [lucas@lu as ] Could you clarify whether you mean "the rails gem as installed by

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32321 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3819][Open] [Patch] Fix mkmf error message typo
32327 [redmine@ru y] Bug #3819: [Patch] Fix mkmf error message typo

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3813] Add Missing RLIMIT_ Constants to Process [Patch]
32328 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3813 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[Ruby 1.9-Bug#3813][Closed] Add Missing RLIMIT_ Constants to Process [Patch]
32329 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3813 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32331 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Karl Baum.

[Ruby 1.9.2-Backport#3818] Seg fault with ruby tmail and ruby 1.9.2
32332 [redmine@ru y] Issue #3818 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
threads.html
top