10553-10828

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9200 ] Problem with long regular expressions
10553 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9200, was opened at 12/03/2007 10:42

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9201 ] An array in a Hahs
10554 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9201, was opened at 2007-03-12 10:50
10555 [rubycore roe] This is as expected. The parameter to Hash#new is evaluated once, and

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9208 ] Ruby Gem installer not playing nice on Ubuntu
10560 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9208, was opened at 2007-03-12 16:19

^ [ANN] Ruby 1.8.6 has been released
10563 [knu iDaemons] I am pleased to announce that Ruby 1.8.6, the latest release from the
+ 10565 [jan.svitok g] haven't tested it more.
| 10566 [jan.svitok g] I mean VS 2005 SP1 of course.
+ 10567 [Daniel.Berge] * New library: digest/bubblebabble
| 10568 [knu iDaemons] Indeed I should have.  I'll keep it in mind for the future.
+ 10572 [hgs dmu.ac.u] I'm getting failures on 2 sun-sparc-solaris9 systems, despite the

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9220 ] Time conversion from UTC to local appears to apply 2007 rules to 2006 dates
10564 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9220, was opened at 2007-03-12 16:19
10569 [nobu ruby-la] It is an issue of the platform irrelevant to Ruby.

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9250 ] "each" function failed to detect element delete then jump a valid element when next yield.
10570 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9250, was opened at 2007-03-13 03:38
10571 [haisenko com] element when next yield.

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9261 ] BigDecimal initialisation bug
10573 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9261, was opened at 2007-03-13 17:32

^ 1.8.6 timeut.rb segfault
10574 [hgs dmu.ac.u] I've just received this message from cron.
10579 [nobu ruby-la] Can't you show reproducable code, or backtrace?
10591 [hgs dmu.ac.u] Yes, but it's from an erb job run by cron, and that's all I got from cron

^ 'rescue' with non-exception class
10575 [B.Candler po] I was just caught out by this odd behaviour: a 'rescue' clause doesn't
+ 10576 [vjoel path.b] I think I've been bit by that one too. Timeout vs. TimeoutError.
+ 10577 [nobu ruby-la] Modules also are allowed there.
+ 10617 [B.Candler po] ... and a class is_a module. Obviously, a class which is a subclass of
  + 10618 [nobu ruby-la] No, what is allowed there is a subclass of Exception, or an
  + 10628 [B.Candler po] OK, interesting (and I'd never come across that feature). iconv is written

^ [ ruby-Patches-9272 ] [PATCH] Rdoc omitting docs for Module due to :stopdoc: directive in lib/yaml/tab.rb
10578 [noreply ruby] Patches item #9272, was opened at 2007-03-13 19:43

^ Kernel#exec on OSX
10580 [ksruby gmail] $ irb
+ 10581 [sur.max gmai] though the system command is working both ways
| 10582 [ksruby gmail] Which is not what I'm looking for.
+ 10583 [shyouhei rub] It's a very difficult problem that can hardly be solved.
  10584 [ksruby gmail] Thank you very much! That explains it.
  10590 [holon radast] charset=US-ASCII

^ Bugfix: Extension Compile Error with 1.8.6
10585 [mailinglists] i tried compile some extensions in a "cpp" C++ file. and the move of
+ 10586 [mailinglists] Please forget this message.
+ 10587 [nobu ruby-la] Instead,
  10588 [mailinglists] No this doesn't help the problem is the line below.  "VALUE thread;"
  10589 [nobu ruby-la] Sorry, I couldn't understand the error messages in your second post.
  10592 [mailinglists] Well it's Microsoft, so it's odd by definition ;-)

^ [ ruby-Patches-9280 ] Digest'ifying OpenSSL::Digest
10593 [noreply ruby] Patches item #9280, was opened at 2007-03-14 21:44

^ [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation
10594 [sylvain.joye] charset="us-ascii"
+ 10595 [mental rydia] fastthread originally had both behaviors, but I had to drop them because I got too many reports of existing Ruby code depending on thread.rb's behavior, where recursive locks block, and non-owners are able to unlock.
+ 10596 [mental rydia] Perhaps you attached the wrong file?  This looks like a variation on the not_owner patch.
  10597 [sylvain.joye] charset="utf-8"
  10598 [mental rydia] Hmm, why not just add a "prev" variable?
  10599 [sylvain.joye] charset="utf-8"
  10600 [mental rydia] Your fix looks good.
  10601 [sylvain.joye] charset="utf-8"
  10602 [mental rydia] Looks good.  You should probably post each of your patches (with descriptions of the problems they fix) to the Ruby bug tracker to make sure that they don't get lost.
  10603 [sylvain.joye] My experience w.r.t. the ruby tracker is that it seems hardly used, and
  10604 [mental rydia] My own experience (with multiple projects) has been that it's best to do both -- put the bug reports/patches in the tracker whilst also calling attention to them on the mailing list:  filing tracker entries without posting to the mailing list usually means that nobody notices, while posting to the mailing list without putting anything in the tracker usually means that nobody remembers.
  10608 [knu iDaemons] Filing an issue to the tracker especially helps when many versions of
  10610 [sylvain.joye] charset="utf-8"
  10612 [mental rydia] FWIW, I agree with Sylvain on all these points.  The bugs addressed by the two necessary patches are subtle in manifestation (so many people have not noticed), but the locking primitives are simply not reliable unless they are addressed.
  10613 [hgs dmu.ac.u] And I'm still getting my thread related segfault from my cron job, even

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9299 ] Thread are inheriting the priority of the starting thread
10607 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9299, was opened at 2007-03-15 08:17

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10609 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 09:35

^ unsubscribe
10611 [rdaubarede a] unsubscribe

^ Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically
10614 [agileanalysi] On 3/15/07, ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org <ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org>

^ Multiton in standard library
10615 [transfire gm] I would like to propose that the Multiton pattern be supported in
10619 [tomp earthli] Is 'multiton' really the right name for this?  I've used a pattern
10620 [transfire gm] And you are absolutely right. It is related to immutability --it is in
+ 10621 [james graypr] I see these points and they are certainly correct, but honestly the
| + 10627 [transfire gm] Yep, your example is the typical way to handle this _at first_. It's
| + 10630 [meinrad.rech] I prefer to use a proven implementation over hacking my own which i'd
|   10631 [transfire gm] There are libs a lot fatter than this in the standard package. And
|   + 10635 [chr_news gmx] I am not sure if your use case example is a good one. One can make the argument that +/- Infinity should be instances of distinct classes.
|   | 10644 [transfire gm] I think whether my particular implementation for +/-Infinity is  a
|   + 10786 [james graypr] I guess this pattern just doesn't come up for me as often as it does
+ 10622 [tomp earthli] Yes, I had seen that when I googled 'multiton'.  As wikipedia
  10623 [transfire gm] I see. Well it's not your most common pattern, clearly. And I have
  + 10624 [vjoel path.b] Maybe so, but that name always make me think of trucks.... It sounds
  | 10629 [rick.denatal] ROTFLMAO!
  + 10625 [tomp earthli] Actually, I think it's probably fairly common.  As you agreed, it's
    10626 [transfire gm] Boy, I'm all rim today. Yea, of course, you're right. They're only

^ Is there interest in this? : get object from its object-specific class?
10616 [rick.denatal] The following is the culmination of a discussion on ruby-talk from a

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9353 ] xmlrpc keepalive connection bug
10632 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9353, was opened at 2007-03-18 16:21

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9359 ] Set.freeze not behaving as expected
10633 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9359, was opened at 2007-03-18 17:22

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10634 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10636 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 14:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10637 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10638 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 14:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10639 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 14:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10640 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10641 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10642 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10643 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 23:41

^ re_set_syntax in libruby
10645 [hramrach cen] For me the re_set_syntax symbol in libruby clashes with another regex

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined
10646 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9376, was opened at 2007-03-19 15:58
10647 [shyouhei rub] Yes.
10648 [sylvain.joye] Well ... maybe you can explain a bit more the "why" ...
10651 [matz ruby-la] Because objects with singleton data can not be shared across
10665 [cdcarter gma] But what if that singleton class just contained a method that allowed
10667 [matz ruby-la] I am not sure if we know what we are doing here.  Dumping objects
10675 [sylvain.joye] I don't see why as soon as the dumping/loading is done by user code. I
+ 10676 [matz ruby-la] In most of my use case, singleton behavior/attribute is fundamental to
| + 10678 [sylvain.joye] _dump is not explicitely defined on ARGF. I don't have any problem with
| | 10679 [matz ruby-la] I think I misread your report.  Sorry.
| + 10685 [matz ruby-la] I fixed and committed in to the repository.  You will never see
+ 10682 [jim freeze.o] When I need to marshal an object that contains a simple singleton,

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10649 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 04:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-3927 ] Buffer error installing gems using Zlib 1.2.1 on Windows
10650 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #3927, was opened at 2006-03-27 12:59

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5319 ] rdoc documents C module methods as instance methods (patch)
10652 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5319, was opened at 2006-08-05 12:13

^ [ ruby-Bugs-6453 ] rdoc --fmt=html throws Segmentation faults
10653 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #6453, was opened at 2006-11-02 05:49

^ [ ruby-Bugs-6370 ] RDoc for Kernel#select same as IO.select
10654 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #6370, was opened at 2006-10-27 21:36

^ [ ruby-Bugs-3866 ] [PATCH] rdoc for String#=~
10655 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #3866, was opened at 2006-03-19 12:18

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5740 ] RDOC doesn't show string  "#" or "\#"
10656 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5740, was opened at 2006-09-13 04:55

^ [ ruby-Bugs-6443 ] ri for specific method returns suggestion to refine search if there are similarly named methods
10657 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #6443, was opened at 2006-11-01 13:19

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5563 ] rdoc/usage uses an uninitalized constant
10658 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5563, was opened at 2006-08-29 13:18

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5921 ] "ri Array.new" doesn't show assignment values
10659 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5921, was opened at 2006-09-26 22:52

^ [ ruby-Bugs-4467 ] RDoc looks for doc headers at function prototypes
10660 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #4467, was opened at 2006-05-13 04:50
10684 [Daniel.Berge] @@ -626,10 +626,18 @@

^ [ ruby-Bugs-3866 ] [PATCH] rdoc for String#=~
10661 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #3866, was opened at 2006-03-19 12:18

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9359 ] Set.freeze not behaving as expected
10662 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9359, was opened at 2007-03-19 02:22

^ Array#initialize: Better error reporting
10663 [lists bertra] irb(main):001:0> RUBY_VERSION
+ 10664 [murphy rubyc] this is funny :) :a is just interpreted as an integer here.
+ 10666 [matz ruby-la] It is compatibility behavior.  It will be fixed in 1.9.  And -w will
  10668 [knu iDaemons] Yeah, compatibility with good ol' Ruby 1.4 and prior. ;)

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10669 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-19 07:41

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9360 ] Matrix inverse problem
10670 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9360, was opened at 2007-03-18 14:41

^ __method__ and __callee__
10671 [gwtmp01 mac.] It looks like __method__ and __callee__ got lost in
10674 [matz ruby-la] Done, partially.  __callee__ does not work yet to get alias name.
10680 [transfire gm] Any chance of getting away from "shadow methods"? In this case an

^ Re: How to get the name of the executing method?
10672 [gwtmp01 mac.] There were two methods, __method__ and __callee__ in 1.9 for

^ [ ruby-Patches-9388 ] remove_one must preserve List invariants
10673 [noreply ruby] Patches item #9388, was opened at 2007-03-20 01:04

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9392 ] exec fails when ruby is built with pthreads enabled
10677 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9392, was opened at 2007-03-19 23:58

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9392 ] exec fails when ruby is built with pthreads enabled
10681 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9392, was opened at 2007-03-20 16:58

^ Rubyforge access
10683 [ntalbott gma] Can someone grant me access to admin bugs in the Rubyforge project?
10694 [tom infoethe] Sure, done!
10696 [ntalbott gma] Works great - thanks Tom!

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9410 ] Bignum.to_s fails for certain values and certain bases (1.8.6 regression)
10686 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9410, was opened at 2007-03-20 11:38

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9410 ] Bignum.to_s fails for certain values and certain bases (1.8.6 regression)
10687 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9410, was opened at 2007-03-20 11:38

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9410 ] Bignum.to_s fails for certain values and certain bases (1.8.6 regression)
10688 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9410, was opened at 2007-03-20 11:38

^ GEM Problem
10690 [ceo hawthorn] ================================================================
10693 [halostatue g] This is better asked on the rubygems-devel list; however, it is a

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9415 ] OpenURI should allow redirects from http -> https URLS
10691 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9415, was opened at 2007-03-20 16:34

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9416 ] net/https peer_cert returning nil
10692 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9416, was opened at 2007-03-20 15:38

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10695 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 04:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-8026 ] YAML fails to parse its own input
10697 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #8026, was opened at 2007-01-20 10:44

^ Extensions to ipaddr.rb
10698 [b.candler po] This is a MIME-formatted message.  If you see this text it means that your
+ 10700 [sroberts uni] Is this your intention?
| 10711 [B.Candler po] # Returns a new ipaddr built by bitwise AND.
| + 10714 [sroberts uni] Fair enough.
| + 10727 [B.Candler po] Hmm. I guess these operators could do IPAddr.new() on their RHS, unless RHS
|   + 10728 [usa garbagec] I think that comparing different versions of IP addresses should
|   + 10737 [jos catnook.] Agreed. This was just a 5 minute hack to demonstrate the idea. This capability
+ 10717 [usa garbagec] Hmm, I have two more suggestions (sorry, without patch).
  10720 [jos catnook.] An IPAddr.entries instance method method that enumerates the IP addresses

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10699 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 09:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-8384 ] Discrepancy between GetoptLong.new and documentation
10701 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #8384, was opened at 2007-02-02 10:06
10702 [Daniel.Berge] Wait - people actually use that module? :-P
10703 [rubycore roe] Sure... what would be a good alternative?
10704 [Daniel.Berge] From the stdlib? I think optparse is generally preferred.

^ [OT] Google Summer of Code proposal.
10705 [pedro.delgal] Three days ago, i have send this sketch proposal to the ruby-talk
10706 [halostatue g] You should post this on the Summer of Code website to the Ruby
10707 [pedro.delgal] I know but i would like some feedback before I want to send it today.
10710 [halostatue g] Trust me; you'll get feedback from the mentors/evaluators (I'm one).

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5372 ] Float#round sample code documentation error
10708 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5372, was opened at 2006-08-10 03:50

^ [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem
10709 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #5990, was opened at 2006-10-02 10:05

^ Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library)
10712 [rick.denatal] Thinking about this a bit, I'm not sure how much more information a
10715 [jos catnook.] This would be nice for some kinds of tracing. We have a Perl Trace library at
10716 [transfire gm] I'm a little confused, What's output of this?
+ 10719 [jos catnook.] It prints a suitably indented execution trace showing caller and
+ 10732 [rick.denatal] I'm guessing that this is bound to the currently executing method, no?
  10739 [pbrannan atd] I agree that the signature must contain at least the above information
  10753 [rick.denatal] My point though is that in common Computer Science terms, methods
  10756 [transfire gm] Thats' true. The real need though is just so we can define method
  10758 [rick.denatal] Something like this might work, the only glitch is methods like
  10774 [transfire gm] Yea, That's basically what I've been doing. It would be nice if we had

^ RCR - Sorry!
10713 [lists bertra] really bad and I detected the "Edit" button. I corrected the

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10718 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 04:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9451 ] Exception in Matrix inverse
10721 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9451, was opened at 2007-03-21 20:40

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9451 ] Exception in Matrix inverse
10722 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9451, was opened at 2007-03-21 20:40

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9451 ] Exception in Matrix inverse
10723 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9451, was opened at 2007-03-21 20:40

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9451 ] Exception in Matrix inverse
10724 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9451, was opened at 2007-03-21 20:40

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9451 ] Exception in Matrix inverse
10725 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9451, was opened at 2007-03-21 20:40

^ New Exploring Facility
10726 [ceo hawthorn] This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10775 [meinrad.rech] I'd be very interested - I have thought about something like this once in a

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9462 ] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance
10729 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9462, was opened at 22/03/2007 11:19
10733 [ceo hawthorn] This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
10736 [rick.denatal] Where did that come from?
10740 [ceo hawthorn] This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9463 ] While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError)
10730 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9463, was opened at 2007-03-22 17:29

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9463 ] While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError)
10731 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9463, was opened at 2007-03-22 17:29

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9470 ] TempFile fails to delete the file if inside a Dir.chdir block
10734 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9470, was opened at 2007-03-22 16:28
10738 [Daniel.Berge] @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9463 ] While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError)
10735 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9463, was opened at 2007-03-22 17:29

^ MyBad ==> Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9462 ] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance
10741 [ceo hawthorn] JUST A NOTE -- I took out the "test_object" Instance and singleton for

^ Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9462 ] BUGS -- New Chart at Program Start
10742 [ceo hawthorn] This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10743 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10744 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10745 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10746 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35
10748 [nobu ruby-la] Sorry, it's a weird side effect of the fix for [ruby-core:9675].
10760 [ntalbott gma] can you include it when you commit the fix?
10778 [ryand-ruby z] I agree. This fix needs to go out. test::unit, autotest, multiruby,

^ [ ruby-Bugs-9300 ] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected
10747 [noreply ruby] Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35

^ class_extension
10749 [transfire gm] I'm just following up to find out the status of consideration for
10750 [matz ruby-la] I am not sure what class_extension or extension does.  Do they return
10751 [transfire gm] You don't remember? It was your idea! Great, now I feel about this
10759 [matz ruby-la] As you might already know, my memory is volatile. ;-)
+ 10773 [transfire gm] That's true. I was just suggesting an alternate notation that seemed
+ 10828 [transfire gm] Oh, I assure you, my memory is far worse!