ruby_core (9201-9400)

 < ^ > 
9201 06/10/17 01:42:27 [ruby-core whyth] Re: Ruby Threads
9202 06/10/17 05:06:23 [rick.denatale g] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9203 06/10/17 05:14:09 [james grayprodu] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9204 06/10/17 05:49:00 [mfp acm.org ] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9205 06/10/17 06:09:00 [sroberts uniser] String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9206 06/10/17 06:43:12 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9207 06/10/17 06:45:19 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9208 06/10/17 07:17:44 [jan.svitok gmai] [PATCH] RDoc: preserve special chars in <tt> Was: Re: bug in rdoc?
9209 06/10/17 07:31:15 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6188 ] Net::HTTP off-by-one error in POST data
9210 06/10/17 14:53:06 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Ruby Threads
9211 06/10/17 16:18:39 [hadmut danisch.] Re: regular expressions tainting?
9212 06/10/17 17:06:13 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9213 06/10/17 17:21:40 [drbrain segment] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9214 06/10/17 18:04:15 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: regular expressions tainting?
9215 06/10/17 18:12:15 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: regular expressions tainting?
9216 06/10/17 20:35:03 [j.vimal gmail.c] A possible optimization in Bignum/Division?
9217 06/10/17 21:52:29 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division?
9218 06/10/18 00:01:11 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9219 06/10/18 00:10:43 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: regular expressions tainting?
9220 06/10/18 00:25:01 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9221 06/10/18 00:44:49 [Thomas.Enebo Su] parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword
9222 06/10/18 00:56:57 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword
9223 06/10/18 04:23:05 [rick.denatale g] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9224 06/10/18 04:51:00 [neleai seznam.c] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division?
9225 06/10/18 09:29:10 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) -------------------------
9226 06/10/18 09:44:50 [james grayprodu] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9227 06/10/18 10:03:29 [sdate everestkc] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()]
9228 06/10/18 10:52:11 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()]
9229 06/10/18 13:03:46 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9230 06/10/18 20:18:57 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9231 06/10/19 03:10:01 [drbrain segment] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9232 06/10/19 03:37:49 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9233 06/10/19 03:45:47 [drbrain segment] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9234 06/10/19 04:13:05 [meta pobox.com ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9235 06/10/19 04:21:46 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9236 06/10/19 04:24:24 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9237 06/10/19 04:41:23 [mfp acm.org ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9238 06/10/19 05:06:02 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9239 06/10/19 05:14:33 [jim weirichhous] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9240 06/10/19 05:36:16 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9241 06/10/19 06:03:59 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9242 06/10/19 06:08:15 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9243 06/10/19 07:48:30 [sroberts uniser] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9244 06/10/19 07:56:56 [sroberts uniser] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9245 06/10/19 08:58:52 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9246 06/10/19 10:19:34 [dblack wobblini] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9247 06/10/19 10:44:56 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9248 06/10/19 11:20:24 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9249 06/10/19 11:30:36 [rick.denatale g] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9250 06/10/19 12:29:46 [jim weirichhous] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) -------------------------
9251 06/10/19 12:58:31 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9252 06/10/19 13:12:09 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9253 06/10/19 13:14:10 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9254 06/10/19 13:37:54 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9255 06/10/19 13:40:42 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9256 06/10/19 14:08:07 [sroberts uniser] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9257 06/10/19 14:49:30 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9258 06/10/19 15:00:42 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9259 06/10/19 15:56:24 [sroberts uniser] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9260 06/10/19 17:52:12 [drbrain segment] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9261 06/10/19 20:16:54 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9262 06/10/19 20:23:32 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9263 06/10/19 20:31:03 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9264 06/10/19 20:36:28 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9265 06/10/19 20:47:14 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9266 06/10/19 20:59:00 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9267 06/10/19 21:07:41 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9268 06/10/19 21:35:22 [tewk tewk.com ] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9269 06/10/19 21:38:06 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9270 06/10/19 22:14:01 [mfp acm.org ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9271 06/10/19 22:34:54 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9272 06/10/19 22:47:47 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9273 06/10/19 22:50:30 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9274 06/10/19 22:59:02 [mfp acm.org ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9275 06/10/19 23:22:18 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 -------------------------
9276 06/10/19 23:31:59 [Thomas.Enebo Su] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9277 06/10/20 01:05:41 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9278 06/10/20 01:20:43 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < Stringin Ruby > 1.8)
9279 06/10/20 02:12:46 [halostatue gmai] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9280 06/10/20 04:21:04 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9281 06/10/20 05:50:06 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9282 06/10/20 10:11:27 [michael.selig f] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9283 06/10/20 10:51:30 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9284 06/10/20 13:24:29 [michael.selig f] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9285 06/10/20 17:51:23 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9286 06/10/20 17:57:07 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9287 06/10/20 20:13:45 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9288 06/10/20 20:30:46 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9289 06/10/20 20:49:47 [jim weirichhous] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9290 06/10/20 21:36:04 [ser germane-sof] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9291 06/10/20 21:40:11 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9293 06/10/20 21:49:33 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9294 06/10/20 22:00:45 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9295 06/10/20 22:37:04 [now bitwi.se ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9296 06/10/21 00:16:48 [meta pobox.com ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9297 06/10/21 00:41:57 [meta pobox.com ] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9298 06/10/21 00:59:47 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9299 06/10/21 01:08:52 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9300 06/10/21 01:11:36 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) -------------------------
9301 06/10/21 01:14:45 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9302 06/10/21 02:21:25 [sroberts uniser] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9303 06/10/21 02:33:24 [sroberts uniser] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9304 06/10/21 03:10:23 [steven lumos.us] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9305 06/10/21 04:00:39 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9306 06/10/21 05:08:39 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9307 06/10/21 05:14:08 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9308 06/10/21 06:07:49 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9309 06/10/21 07:03:24 [sroberts uniser] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9310 06/10/21 07:20:59 [halostatue gmai] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9311 06/10/21 11:29:21 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9312 06/10/21 11:32:01 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9313 06/10/21 11:32:45 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9314 06/10/21 14:37:43 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9315 06/10/21 20:32:49 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9316 06/10/21 22:10:49 [jay jayfields.c] test unit addition
9317 06/10/21 22:48:20 [james grayprodu] The Plan for Speeding Up CSV
9318 06/10/22 00:06:33 [nakahiro sarion] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV
9319 06/10/22 00:22:05 [Charles.O.Nutte] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9320 06/10/22 20:47:03 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Readline patch
9321 06/10/22 23:34:51 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: test unit addition
9322 06/10/23 09:42:20 [michael.selig f] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO?
9323 06/10/23 14:03:39 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6279 ] DateTime doesn't parse timezone correctly
9324 06/10/23 16:17:25 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6282 ] loading file again doesnt update debugger text
9325 06/10/24 23:06:45 [rick.denatale g] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) -------------------------
9326 06/10/24 23:31:41 [dblack wobblini] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9327 06/10/25 04:05:40 [meta pobox.com ] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9328 06/10/25 04:33:22 [meta pobox.com ] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8
9329 06/10/25 22:59:37 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6314 ] Bitwise inversion of 32 bit numbers with most significant bit set results in overflow
9330 06/10/26 01:02:40 [james grayprodu] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV
9331 06/10/26 08:03:12 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6321 ] Make open-uri capable of handling HTTP methods other than GET
9332 06/10/26 08:32:39 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster
9333 06/10/26 15:47:02 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster
9334 06/10/26 15:50:56 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster
9335 06/10/26 21:27:06 [ntalbott gmail.] Re: test unit addition
9336 06/10/27 03:46:26 [matju artengine] ruby-fr@ruby-lang.org is broken
9337 06/10/27 13:33:34 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6348 ] blocks with arity of 1 behave inconsistently when passed more or less parameters
9338 06/10/27 14:27:21 [sroberts uniser] String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9339 06/10/27 16:08:55 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9340 06/10/27 22:40:22 [rick.denatale g] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)
9341 06/10/28 01:12:01 [djberg96 gmail.] [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases
9342 06/10/28 01:26:02 [james grayprodu] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases
9343 06/10/28 01:29:17 [phurley gmail.c] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases
9344 06/10/28 01:35:57 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases
9345 06/10/28 05:59:00 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6358 ] marshal error with TYPE_SYMLINK
9346 06/10/28 07:50:17 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6366 ] Fix for bug 3245
9347 06/10/28 08:45:27 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6368 ] Time Changes Zones
9348 06/10/28 09:09:38 [sroberts uniser] Why does Certificate.check_private_key call OSSL_Warning?
9349 06/10/28 12:55:23 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6369 ] core dump using mkmf
9350 06/10/28 13:36:43 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6370 ] RDoc for Kernel#select same as IO.select -------------------------
9351 06/10/29 04:26:51 [djberg96 gmail.] [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased
9352 06/10/29 04:47:11 [marcel vernix.o] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased
9353 06/10/29 05:23:45 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased
9354 06/10/29 19:05:36 [drbrain segment] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased
9355 06/10/30 12:34:00 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()]
9356 06/10/30 14:01:49 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()]
9357 06/10/31 03:20:26 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6400 ] Time Does not Respect Subclasses
9363 06/11/01 06:50:31 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6418 ] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting.
9364 06/11/01 17:40:16 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6413 ] Some Time Constructors Fail to Call initialize
9365 06/11/01 19:42:04 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6431 ] net/ftp should handle sending of data, not files
9366 06/11/01 19:51:12 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6433 ] Range of Symbols yields only first item as Symbol
9367 06/11/02 00:57:02 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6437 ] reduce memory usage of rdoc
9368 06/11/02 01:05:39 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6438 ] cvs diff broken for pserver
9369 06/11/02 04:19:18 [ara.t.howard no] fatal flaw in popen4 on windows? [WAS] Re: Nonblocking IO read
9370 06/11/02 06:08:26 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Patches-6442 ] Array#shuffle and Array#shuffle!
9371 06/11/02 06:19:53 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6443 ] ri for specific method returns suggestion to refine search if there are similarly named methods
9372 06/11/02 06:24:40 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6444 ] Set#^ (xor) is broken - patch included
9373 06/11/02 13:46:22 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6442 ] Array#shuffle and Array#shuffle!
9374 06/11/02 13:48:26 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6438 ] cvs diff broken for pserver
9375 06/11/02 15:20:08 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6438 ] cvs diff broken for pserver -------------------------
9376 06/11/02 22:49:29 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6453 ] rdoc --fmt=html throws Segmentation faults
9377 06/11/03 03:19:39 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: rdoc parsing bug, confused by block "end" in class-context
9378 06/11/03 05:41:01 [ara.t.howard no] test
9379 06/11/03 06:02:09 [ara.t.howard no] fatal flaw in popen4 on windows? [WAS] Re: Nonblocking IO read (fwd)
9380 06/11/03 06:20:45 [james grayprodu] Re: test
9381 06/11/03 14:06:19 [abhisek rubyfor] Native Thread extension for 1.8
9382 06/11/04 01:25:51 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9383 06/11/04 08:46:54 [nwiger scea.com] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9384 06/11/04 09:12:11 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9385 06/11/04 12:11:54 [ko1 atdot.net ] merge YARV into Ruby
9386 06/11/04 12:34:15 [noreply rubyfor] [ ruby-Bugs-6474 ] IMAP error parsing bodystructure of multipart/mixed with message/delivery-status sub-part
9387 06/11/04 13:32:02 [james grayprodu] Re: merge YARV into Ruby
9388 06/11/04 13:46:38 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: merge YARV into Ruby
9389 06/11/04 13:54:46 [james grayprodu] Re: merge YARV into Ruby
9390 06/11/04 18:52:41 [drbrain segment] Re: eval in YARV (was: merge YARV into Ruby)
9391 06/11/04 18:54:44 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: eval in YARV
9392 06/11/04 19:51:13 [decoux moulon.i] Re: merge YARV into Ruby
9393 06/11/04 23:25:53 [ricadias gmail.] unsubscribe
9394 06/11/05 04:23:30 [vjoel path.berk] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9395 06/11/05 05:12:42 [lukfugl gmail.c] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9396 06/11/06 02:30:27 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9397 06/11/06 04:21:45 [vjoel path.berk] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9398 06/11/06 08:05:13 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9399 06/11/06 08:42:31 [vjoel path.berk] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6468 ] the sign of a number is omitted when squaring it. -2**2 vs (-2)**2
9400 06/11/06 12:56:12 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6418 ] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting. -------------------------