ruby_core (34601-34800)

 < ^ > 
34601 11/01/19 20:10:57 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String)
34602 11/01/19 20:54:51 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264] General type coercion protocol for Ruby
34603 11/01/19 21:10:39 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34604 11/01/19 21:13:56 [naruse airemix.] Re: Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String)
34605 11/01/19 22:37:28 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4009] Segfault with combination of threads and condition variables
34606 11/01/19 22:43:47 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34607 11/01/19 22:56:32 [halostatue gmai] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34608 11/01/19 23:53:09 [now bitwi.se ] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34609 11/01/20 00:43:44 [usa garbagecoll] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34610 11/01/20 00:56:43 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294][Open] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34611 11/01/20 01:58:50 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34612 11/01/20 02:37:10 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34613 11/01/20 02:44:34 [luislavena gmai] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34614 11/01/20 02:55:35 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Avoiding $LOAD_PATH pollution
34615 11/01/20 04:52:07 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3967] rdoc generates bad HTML output for '...' in parameter list, call-seq: with multiple values
34616 11/01/20 05:58:46 [gwtmp01 mac.com] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34617 11/01/20 06:22:31 [now bitwi.se ] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34629 11/01/20 07:35:44 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34620 11/01/20 07:04:55 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34621 11/01/20 07:09:00 [gwtmp01 mac.com] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34628 11/01/20 07:32:38 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34622 11/01/20 07:19:53 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34625 11/01/20 07:27:39 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk. -------------------------
34626 11/01/20 07:27:39 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34624 11/01/20 07:26:41 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34627 11/01/20 07:29:38 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34618 11/01/20 06:53:37 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264] General type coercion protocol for Ruby
34619 11/01/20 06:53:32 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4283] Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally
34623 11/01/20 07:26:41 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34630 11/01/20 09:03:53 [gwtmp01 mac.com] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34631 11/01/20 09:14:57 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264] General type coercion protocol for Ruby
34632 11/01/20 09:27:44 [rr.rosas gmail.] Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34633 11/01/20 09:31:09 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34634 11/01/20 10:00:31 [rr.rosas gmail.] Returning from the callee
34635 11/01/20 11:22:17 [usa garbagecoll] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34636 11/01/20 11:43:46 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4295][Open] Time.utc(1960) raises ArgumentError: argument out of range (on Windows)
34637 11/01/20 12:10:27 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4295][Rejected] Time.utc(1960) raises ArgumentError: argument out of range (on Windows)
34638 11/01/20 12:45:40 [mame tsg.ne.jp ] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4283] Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally
34639 11/01/20 13:00:02 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34640 11/01/20 13:00:00 [mame tsg.ne.jp ] Re: Returning from the callee
34641 11/01/20 13:05:28 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4297][Assigned] test_time in ruby/test/psych/test_json_tree.rb makes test failure
34642 11/01/20 13:49:00 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34643 11/01/20 14:53:57 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4295] Time.utc(1960) raises ArgumentError: argument out of range (on Windows)
34644 11/01/20 15:25:14 [usa garbagecoll] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34645 11/01/20 15:35:33 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4256] [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18) [i386-mingw32]
34646 11/01/20 16:35:09 [giuseppe.bilott] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34647 11/01/20 18:13:32 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34648 11/01/20 18:22:25 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298][Open] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
34649 11/01/20 18:30:38 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
34650 11/01/20 18:30:29 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? -------------------------
34651 11/01/20 18:35:04 [ghazel gmail.co] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34652 11/01/20 18:59:45 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Returning from the callee
34653 11/01/20 19:21:33 [now bitwi.se ] Re: Returning from the callee
34654 11/01/20 19:42:58 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34655 11/01/20 20:44:14 [jonas pfenniger] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34656 11/01/20 20:44:28 [eregontp gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4297][Assigned] test_time in ruby/test/psych/test_json_tree.rb makes test failure
34657 11/01/20 20:53:11 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34658 11/01/20 20:53:59 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String)
34659 11/01/20 21:10:21 [jonas pfenniger] MRI file architecture doc
34660 11/01/20 21:38:57 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34661 11/01/20 23:17:47 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34662 11/01/20 23:23:09 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34663 11/01/20 23:28:04 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34664 11/01/21 00:04:53 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4009] Segfault with combination of threads and condition variables
34665 11/01/21 00:53:13 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34666 11/01/21 01:14:42 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34667 11/01/21 01:15:43 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34668 11/01/21 02:04:59 [cremes.devlist ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34669 11/01/21 02:30:57 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34670 11/01/21 03:27:55 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34671 11/01/21 03:31:06 [ruby-ml kittens] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34672 11/01/21 03:34:16 [rb janlelis.de ] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34673 11/01/21 03:38:45 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34674 11/01/21 03:51:05 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4139] abort and core dump in ruby 1.8.7-p302
34675 11/01/21 03:56:32 [naruse airemix.] Re: Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String) -------------------------
34676 11/01/21 04:02:21 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34677 11/01/21 04:02:31 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34678 11/01/21 04:06:45 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34679 11/01/21 04:10:13 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4300][Open] Merge keys not working as expected in psych yaml parser
34680 11/01/21 04:17:38 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34681 11/01/21 04:48:50 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34682 11/01/21 05:04:38 [naruse airemix.] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34683 11/01/21 05:51:41 [now bitwi.se ] Re: Returning from the callee
34684 11/01/21 06:25:59 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34685 11/01/21 06:37:52 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34686 11/01/21 06:40:46 [judofyr gmail.c] Re: Returning from the callee
34687 11/01/21 06:51:10 [headius headius] Re: Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk.
34688 11/01/21 08:38:28 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34689 11/01/21 09:27:06 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3889][Closed] Incorrectly detected i686-w64-mingw32 as x64-mingw
34690 11/01/21 09:35:03 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301][Open] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
34691 11/01/21 09:41:58 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
34692 11/01/21 09:52:29 [headius headius] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34693 11/01/21 10:01:22 [jim.weirich gma] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34694 11/01/21 10:58:15 [usa garbagecoll] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34695 11/01/21 11:29:50 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34696 11/01/21 11:41:29 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4257] switch_hitter - an acceleration of date library
34697 11/01/21 12:25:33 [aaron tenderlov] rubycommitters.org contest
34698 11/01/21 13:56:45 [headius headius] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34699 11/01/21 14:36:48 [kosaki.motohiro] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34700 11/01/21 14:44:24 [jballanc gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?." -------------------------
34701 11/01/21 14:45:36 [jballanc gmail.] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34702 11/01/21 16:32:19 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34703 11/01/21 16:50:27 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34704 11/01/21 17:00:05 [radek.bulat gma] Re: Returning from the callee
34705 11/01/21 17:03:37 [naruse airemix.] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34706 11/01/21 17:13:35 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34707 11/01/21 17:39:49 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34708 11/01/21 17:46:37 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34709 11/01/21 17:50:19 [sdsykes gmail.c] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34710 11/01/21 18:04:07 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34711 11/01/21 18:18:44 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34712 11/01/21 18:37:52 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34713 11/01/21 18:40:33 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34714 11/01/21 18:46:45 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34715 11/01/21 18:56:01 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34716 11/01/21 18:58:29 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34717 11/01/21 19:06:28 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34718 11/01/21 19:19:47 [eregontp gmail.] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34719 11/01/21 19:51:25 [billk cts.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34720 11/01/21 19:54:02 [mail maasha.dk ] Re: Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String)
34722 11/01/21 20:17:51 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34723 11/01/21 20:24:14 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34724 11/01/21 20:26:53 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4303][Open] Segmentation fault (using tarantula and hpricot)
34725 11/01/21 20:59:06 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4303][Feedback] Segmentation fault (using tarantula and hpricot) -------------------------
34726 11/01/21 21:05:08 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
34727 11/01/21 21:06:29 [yugui yugui.jp ] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34728 11/01/21 21:08:58 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34729 11/01/21 21:13:37 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: MRI file architecture doc
34730 11/01/21 21:18:07 [jonas pfenniger] Re: Returning from the callee
34731 11/01/21 21:20:30 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34732 11/01/21 21:21:51 [naruse airemix.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34733 11/01/21 21:22:01 [billk cts.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34734 11/01/21 21:40:24 [billk cts.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34735 11/01/21 21:57:31 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34736 11/01/21 22:06:59 [luislavena gmai] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34737 11/01/21 22:24:44 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34738 11/01/21 22:30:23 [halostatue gmai] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34739 11/01/21 22:55:53 [jonas pfenniger] Redmine spam
34740 11/01/21 23:13:42 [jim.weirich gma] Re: Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?."
34741 11/01/21 23:34:08 [naruse airemix.] Re: Redmine spam
34742 11/01/21 23:42:30 [matthias waecht] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34743 11/01/21 23:42:29 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34744 11/01/21 23:52:53 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34745 11/01/22 00:28:21 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: Returning from the callee
34746 11/01/22 00:36:12 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
34747 11/01/22 00:49:10 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34748 11/01/22 00:54:59 [luislavena gmai] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34749 11/01/22 00:55:21 [cremes.devlist ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34750 11/01/22 01:05:39 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? -------------------------
34751 11/01/22 01:11:40 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34752 11/01/22 01:30:15 [now bitwi.se ] Is evaluation order of arguments specified?
34753 11/01/22 01:30:23 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34754 11/01/22 01:52:30 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34755 11/01/22 02:00:21 [halostatue gmai] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34756 11/01/22 02:28:53 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34757 11/01/22 02:38:43 [code jeremyevan] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34758 11/01/22 02:43:44 [meta pobox.com ] Re: Hash iteration contract (was Re: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?)
34759 11/01/22 02:52:44 [evan fallingsno] Re: Is evaluation order of arguments specified?
34760 11/01/22 03:06:56 [meta pobox.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34761 11/01/22 03:15:53 [meta pobox.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34762 11/01/22 03:16:22 [now bitwi.se ] Re: Is evaluation order of arguments specified?
34763 11/01/22 03:21:25 [evan fallingsno] Re: Is evaluation order of arguments specified?
34764 11/01/22 03:47:04 [headius headius] Re: Hash iteration contract (was Re: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?)
34765 11/01/22 03:52:45 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34766 11/01/22 03:56:28 [headius headius] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34767 11/01/22 04:02:14 [ruby-ml kittens] Re: Hash iteration contract (was Re: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?)
34768 11/01/22 04:22:03 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34769 11/01/22 04:55:13 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34770 11/01/22 05:25:02 [blambeau gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34771 11/01/22 05:30:13 [meta pobox.com ] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34772 11/01/22 06:10:08 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34773 11/01/22 06:19:36 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34774 11/01/22 06:30:14 [lucas lucas-nus] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34775 11/01/22 06:56:44 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? -------------------------
34776 11/01/22 09:29:08 [ks kurtstephens] MRI 1.9 valgrind errors
34777 11/01/22 10:22:21 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34778 11/01/22 10:51:48 [ks kurtstephens] Re: MRI 1.9 valgrind errors
34779 11/01/22 11:27:07 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301][Closed] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
34780 11/01/22 11:27:09 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4297][Closed] test_time in ruby/test/psych/test_json_tree.rb makes test failure
34781 11/01/22 11:37:06 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4300][Closed] Merge keys not working as expected in psych yaml parser
34782 11/01/22 17:23:35 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
34783 11/01/22 17:57:29 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34784 11/01/22 18:31:56 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34785 11/01/22 20:33:50 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34786 11/01/22 21:49:21 [rr.rosas gmail.] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34787 11/01/22 22:11:09 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
34788 11/01/22 22:47:06 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4303] Segmentation fault (using tarantula and hpricot)
34789 11/01/22 23:27:34 [cezary.baginski] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34790 11/01/23 00:35:05 [goyox86 gmail.c] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34791 11/01/23 01:41:47 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4306][Open] psych makes a lot of test failure on Win32 build
34792 11/01/23 02:14:24 [drbrain segment] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34793 11/01/23 03:42:20 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
34794 11/01/23 05:18:05 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34795 11/01/23 07:18:36 [cezary.baginski] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
34796 11/01/23 07:41:29 [aaron tenderlov] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
34797 11/01/23 07:44:28 [redmine ruby-la] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301][Open] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
34798 11/01/23 07:52:07 [aaron tenderlov] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4306][Open] psych makes a lot of test failure on Win32 build
34799 11/01/23 07:59:57 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
34800 11/01/23 08:06:12 [phasis gmail.co] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length. -------------------------