ruby_core (14401-14600)

 < ^ > 
14401 07/12/25 10:58:01 [alterego sdf.lo] Re: pre-release note for the christmas release.
14402 07/12/25 11:11:46 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
14403 07/12/25 11:18:25 [dave pragprog.c] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
14404 07/12/25 11:26:48 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
14405 07/12/25 11:39:15 [shiba mail2.acc] Re: Many external symbols _without_ prefix in libruby object file
14406 07/12/25 11:54:13 [shiba mail2.acc] Re: Many external symbols _without_ prefix in libruby object file
14407 07/12/25 12:35:56 [shiba mail2.acc] [PATCH] make native_* functions static in thread_*.[ch]
14408 07/12/25 14:16:01 [james grayprodu] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb
14409 07/12/25 14:16:01 [james grayprodu] Re: replace csv.rb with fastercsv.rb
14410 07/12/25 14:19:22 [james grayprodu] Rolling map_with_index
14411 07/12/25 15:06:38 [ko1 atdot.net ] test-all on Debian/GNU etch
14412 07/12/25 15:22:50 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Rolling map_with_index
14413 07/12/25 16:16:52 [ko1 atdot.net ] result of test-all on FreeBSD 6.2
14414 07/12/25 16:58:10 [drbrain segment] Re: [PATCH] Timeout.timeout expires early - breaks RubyGems
14415 07/12/25 18:30:19 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: RDoc: [FATAL] failed to allocate memory
14416 07/12/25 19:02:25 [matz ruby-lang.] 1.9.0 status as of 12/25 19:00
14417 07/12/25 19:52:37 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: [tangent] IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
14418 07/12/26 00:03:28 [rich infoether.] Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0
14419 07/12/26 00:50:28 [frederick.cheun] Re: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0
14420 07/12/26 03:07:25 [drbrain segment] Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14421 07/12/26 03:38:46 [znmeb cesmail.n] Ruby 1.9.0-0 benchmarks
14422 07/12/26 03:47:58 [znmeb cesmail.n] Paths, environment variables, etc. for building C extensions with Ruby 1.9?
14423 07/12/26 03:57:48 [rich infoether.] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14424 07/12/26 03:58:26 [ceo hawthorne-p] Re: [tangent] IRHG - GC Memory Fragmentation?
14425 07/12/26 04:20:20 [frederick.cheun] Re: Paths, environment variables, etc. for building C extensions with Ruby 1.9? -------------------------
14426 07/12/26 04:21:26 [gethemant gmail] Re: Paths, environment variables, etc. for building C extensions with Ruby 1.9?
14427 07/12/26 04:31:08 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14428 07/12/26 04:39:37 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-0 benchmarks
14429 07/12/26 04:43:51 [gethemant gmail] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14430 07/12/26 06:01:23 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14431 07/12/26 06:35:34 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14432 07/12/26 06:40:37 [ggarra advanced] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14433 07/12/26 06:42:20 [gethemant gmail] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14434 07/12/26 06:46:45 [wcfarrington gm] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14435 07/12/26 06:52:53 [filipe icewall.] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14436 07/12/26 09:27:08 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14437 07/12/26 09:45:43 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14438 07/12/26 10:07:26 [james grayprodu] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14439 07/12/26 10:30:05 [flori nixe.ping] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14440 07/12/26 11:51:48 [luislavena gmai] Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests.
14441 07/12/26 12:13:23 [ceo hawthorne-p] IDBG - Fixed idbg_manual.html
14442 07/12/26 12:19:32 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests.
14443 07/12/26 12:27:06 [luislavena gmai] Re: Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests.
14444 07/12/26 13:29:58 [james grayprodu] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14445 07/12/26 15:32:54 [amaurya brickre] unsubscribe
14446 07/12/26 17:55:23 [drbrain segment] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14447 07/12/26 18:15:29 [andrew hijacked] PATCH: fix socket support for 1.9 on IRIX
14448 07/12/26 19:24:21 [jarpcs gmail.co] Multiple ways to do a thing
14449 07/12/26 20:19:07 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Multiple ways to do a thing
14450 07/12/26 20:41:31 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance -------------------------
14451 07/12/26 21:56:56 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14452 07/12/26 23:16:07 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14453 07/12/26 23:32:32 [vincent.isambar] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14454 07/12/26 23:46:19 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14455 07/12/27 00:10:43 [dave pragprog.c] Gem versioning not quite right?
14456 07/12/27 00:18:58 [luislavena gmai] Re: Odd situation with mingw, readline and readline tests.
14457 07/12/27 00:28:09 [flori nixe.ping] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14458 07/12/27 01:16:04 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14459 07/12/27 01:18:41 [charles.nutter ] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14460 07/12/27 01:27:30 [charles.nutter ] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14461 07/12/27 01:38:20 [frederick.cheun] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14462 07/12/27 01:52:02 [charles.nutter ] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14463 07/12/27 01:57:22 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14464 07/12/27 02:02:26 [rocky.bernstein] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14465 07/12/27 03:32:59 [hramrach centru] Re: Many external symbols _without_ prefix in libruby object file
14466 07/12/27 04:11:37 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14467 07/12/27 04:30:04 [halostatue gmai] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14468 07/12/27 04:58:38 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14469 07/12/27 04:59:12 [rich infoether.] Re: Gem versioning not quite right?
14470 07/12/27 05:03:23 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
14471 07/12/27 05:04:52 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14472 07/12/27 05:27:58 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14473 07/12/27 05:32:58 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: [Spam] What does volatile assignment of *pos in rb_thread_s_new() do?
14474 07/12/27 05:38:05 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14475 07/12/27 05:41:49 [rich infoether.] Re: Gem versioning not quite right? -------------------------
14476 07/12/27 05:43:38 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14477 07/12/27 05:49:19 [charles.nutter ] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
14478 07/12/27 05:51:53 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14480 07/12/27 05:55:46 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14481 07/12/27 06:17:50 [murphy rubychan] Re: Multiple ways to do a thing
14482 07/12/27 06:44:38 [ggarra advanced] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14483 07/12/27 06:49:00 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
14484 07/12/27 07:03:12 [charles.nutter ] Re: Some Ruby 1.9 loose ends to tie up
14485 07/12/27 07:03:42 [ggarra advanced] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-0 benchmarks
14486 07/12/27 07:19:43 [alex pressure.t] Re: Paths, environment variables, etc. for building C extensions with Ruby 1.9?
14487 07/12/27 08:07:31 [jameskilton gma] Re: C++ Functors and Ruby extensions
14488 07/12/27 08:10:27 [gregory.t.brown] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14489 07/12/27 10:47:44 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: PATCH: fix socket support for 1.9 on IRIX
14490 07/12/27 11:49:26 [brent mbari.org] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14491 07/12/27 13:09:06 [halostatue gmai] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14492 07/12/27 13:50:29 [drbrain segment] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14493 07/12/27 13:55:33 [drbrain segment] Re: Legacy support
14494 07/12/27 14:30:14 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14495 07/12/27 16:42:08 [ggarra advanced] Re: C++ Functors and Ruby extensions
14496 07/12/27 17:14:12 [ggarra advanced] Re: C++ Functors and Ruby extensions
14497 07/12/27 18:41:48 [gethemant gmail] Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9
14498 07/12/27 18:52:20 [mumismo gmail.c] Re: Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9
14499 07/12/27 23:05:53 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9
14500 07/12/27 23:16:55 [decoux moulon.i] [1.9] rb_catch() -------------------------
14501 07/12/27 23:23:53 [rick.denatale g] Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14502 07/12/27 23:41:52 [rich infoether.] Disabling RubyGems in 1.9.0, was Re: Legacy support
14503 07/12/27 23:45:35 [rich infoether.] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14504 07/12/28 00:17:29 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14505 07/12/28 00:25:07 [charles.nutter ] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14506 07/12/28 00:27:16 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: C++ Functors and Ruby extensions
14507 07/12/28 00:54:14 [ggarra advanced] Re: Disabling RubyGems in 1.9.0, was Re: Legacy support
14508 07/12/28 00:56:47 [luislavena gmai] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14509 07/12/28 01:03:53 [pbrannan atdesk] Re: Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9
14510 07/12/28 01:39:59 [gethemant gmail] Re: Status of Event Driven Network Programming Libraries in 1.9
14511 07/12/28 03:14:31 [ceo hawthorne-p] Re: [1.9] rb_catch()
14512 07/12/28 04:11:05 [ggarra advanced] --disable-gems not overriding RUBYOPT
14513 07/12/28 05:13:02 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14514 07/12/28 05:37:44 [luislavena gmai] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14515 07/12/28 05:50:47 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14516 07/12/28 07:03:34 [rich infoether.] Re: --disable-gems not overriding RUBYOPT
14517 07/12/28 07:37:46 [d.bussink gmail] Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14518 07/12/28 07:48:08 [ggarra advanced] Re: --disable-gems not overriding RUBYOPT
14519 07/12/28 08:45:09 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14520 07/12/28 09:00:05 [andrew hijacked] Rdoc coredump on FreeBSD 6.2 with ruby 1.9.0
14521 07/12/28 09:04:55 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14522 07/12/28 10:24:44 [ed.odanow wonad] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14523 07/12/28 10:37:53 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14524 07/12/28 12:39:29 [filipe icewall.] Zlib::Inflate changes to net/http.rb
14525 07/12/28 13:31:31 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects -------------------------
14526 07/12/28 14:01:29 [james grayprodu] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14527 07/12/28 14:03:44 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: Multiple ways to do a thing
14528 07/12/28 14:04:03 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail toload in 1.9.0)
14529 07/12/28 14:04:00 [duerst it.aoyam] Re: Zlib::Inflate changes to net/http.rb
14530 07/12/28 14:05:06 [james grayprodu] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14531 07/12/28 14:23:04 [filipe icewall.] Re: Zlib::Inflate changes to net/http.rb
14532 07/12/28 14:31:23 [drbrain segment] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14533 07/12/28 15:36:21 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14534 07/12/28 15:53:21 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14535 07/12/28 16:47:25 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14536 07/12/28 17:06:18 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14537 07/12/28 17:27:05 [ryand-ruby zens] 1.9: problem with mrhs in exc_list
14538 07/12/28 17:40:07 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14539 07/12/28 17:42:51 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14540 07/12/28 17:48:56 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14541 07/12/28 18:02:09 [rocky.bernstein] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14542 07/12/28 18:28:23 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14543 07/12/28 18:35:48 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Invalid use of mktime() in Ruby 1.8/1.9 results in incorrect Time objects
14544 07/12/28 22:39:46 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Block-local variables - obsolete?
14545 07/12/28 23:48:38 [rick.denatale g] Re: Block-local variables - obsolete?
14546 07/12/29 00:08:11 [dave pragprog.c] Re: Legacy support (Was: Base64 not there makes Rails 2.0.2 fail to load in 1.9.0)
14547 07/12/29 01:16:52 [halostatue gmai] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14548 07/12/29 01:39:22 [rocky.bernstein] Re: Should Ruby1.9 default program suffix be changed?
14549 07/12/29 02:27:28 [khaines enigo.c] multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14550 07/12/29 03:16:42 [rubys intertwin] Ruby 1.9 and Unicode -------------------------
14551 07/12/29 03:59:34 [jftucker gmail.] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14552 07/12/29 04:02:58 [david davidflan] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14553 07/12/29 04:09:48 [david davidflan] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14554 07/12/29 04:23:12 [rubys intertwin] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14555 07/12/29 04:54:11 [frederick.cheun] module_eval oddness on 1.9
14556 07/12/29 05:00:35 [frederick.cheun] crash on 1.9 when using class_eval on a string with a syntax error
14557 07/12/29 05:07:19 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14558 07/12/29 05:46:10 [rubys intertwin] Astral Plane Characters and Ruby 1.9
14559 07/12/29 05:50:12 [rubys intertwin] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14560 07/12/29 06:20:28 [brent mbari.org] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14561 07/12/29 06:46:04 [david davidflan] Re: Astral Plane Characters and Ruby 1.9
14562 07/12/29 07:05:04 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14563 07/12/29 07:27:45 [rubys intertwin] Re: Astral Plane Characters and Ruby 1.9
14564 07/12/29 09:59:43 [hramrach centru] locale in ruby
14566 07/12/29 13:09:49 [rubys intertwin] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14567 07/12/29 15:58:59 [ggarra advanced] Makefile issues
14568 07/12/29 16:39:57 [ggarra advanced] Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14569 07/12/29 16:58:14 [ggarra advanced] Wide strings to ruby strings
14570 07/12/29 17:32:44 [brent mbari.org] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14571 07/12/29 18:51:49 [decoux moulon.i] Re: [1.9] rb_catch()
14572 07/12/29 19:31:55 [murphy rubychan] Re: Why is Array not Comparable
14573 07/12/29 19:48:51 [murphy rubychan] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14574 07/12/29 20:00:30 [charles.nutter ] Re: Experimental PATCH to improve thread performance
14575 07/12/29 20:26:42 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Why is Array not Comparable -------------------------
14576 07/12/29 22:34:33 [rick.denatale g] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14577 07/12/29 22:40:11 [rick.denatale g] Re: Why is Array not Comparable
14578 07/12/29 22:45:11 [usa garbagecoll] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14579 07/12/29 22:46:43 [d.bussink gmail] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14580 07/12/29 23:34:00 [d.bussink gmail] Incorrect check for valid times in Date#_valid_time?
14581 07/12/29 23:47:01 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby 1.9 and Unicode
14582 07/12/29 23:57:53 [halostatue gmai] Re: Wide strings to ruby strings
14583 07/12/30 00:01:49 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14584 07/12/30 00:04:24 [akr fsij.org ] Re: locale in ruby
14585 07/12/30 00:11:59 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Wide strings to ruby strings
14586 07/12/30 00:36:26 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14587 07/12/30 00:38:57 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14588 07/12/30 00:57:55 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14589 07/12/30 01:03:56 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14590 07/12/30 01:30:23 [khaines enigo.c] Re: multibyte strings & bucket-of-bytes efficiency under 1.9.0
14591 07/12/30 02:08:37 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14592 07/12/30 02:19:11 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14593 07/12/30 02:29:35 [ggarra advanced] Re: [Spam] Re: Wide strings to ruby strings
14594 07/12/30 02:46:26 [decoux moulon.i] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14595 07/12/30 03:47:14 [tony clickcaste] IO#write_nonblock and Errno::EAGAIN
14596 07/12/30 04:45:55 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14597 07/12/30 04:46:00 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14598 07/12/30 04:56:53 [ggarra advanced] Re: Layout of includes in ruby 1.9
14599 07/12/30 07:05:15 [gwtmp01 mac.com] Re: IO#write_nonblock and Errno::EAGAIN
14600 07/12/30 07:55:08 [hramrach centru] Re: locale in ruby -------------------------