ruby_core (11801-12000)

 < ^ > 
11801 07/07/25 04:26:41 [tjw omnigroup.c] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11802 07/07/25 06:01:56 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11803 07/07/25 06:22:06 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11804 07/07/25 06:39:46 [david davidflan] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11805 07/07/25 07:54:09 [james grayprodu] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11806 07/07/25 11:53:59 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11807 07/07/25 12:15:22 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11808 07/07/25 14:48:56 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11809 07/07/25 15:11:21 [shugo ruby-lang] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11810 07/07/25 15:12:17 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11811 07/07/25 15:39:12 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11812 07/07/25 17:04:43 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11813 07/07/25 22:23:52 [ser germane-sof] Status of installed.files
11814 07/07/25 22:27:09 [ser germane-sof] Re: Status of installed.files
11815 07/07/26 01:51:34 [rick.denatale g] Re: Parsing bug with 'return not' (was, Syntax bug)
11816 07/07/26 06:12:33 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Status of installed.files
11817 07/07/26 10:55:18 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11818 07/07/26 13:07:57 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11819 07/07/26 17:00:04 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11820 07/07/26 17:50:25 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11821 07/07/27 11:12:14 [rocky.bernstein] Columnize, irb, and ruby-debug
11822 07/07/27 15:55:22 [charles.nutter ] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11823 07/07/28 02:36:07 [cdcarter gmail.] Re: Columnize, irb, and ruby-debug
11824 07/07/28 03:42:34 [rocky.bernstein] Re: Columnize, irb, and ruby-debug
11825 07/07/28 11:09:54 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: What libraries to be unbundled? -------------------------
11826 07/07/30 00:32:06 [robert.dober gm] Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11827 07/07/30 02:48:08 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11828 07/07/30 03:50:42 [vjoel path.berk] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11829 07/07/30 04:19:44 [robert.dober gm] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11830 07/07/30 04:27:54 [vjoel path.berk] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11831 07/07/30 04:45:09 [robert.dober gm] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11832 07/07/31 03:16:51 [evan fallingsno] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11833 07/07/31 05:51:01 [steven lumos.us] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11834 07/07/31 17:48:21 [zimbatm oree.ch] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11835 07/07/31 18:04:07 [ruby dougle.tom] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11836 07/08/01 02:19:13 [meta pobox.com ] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11837 07/08/01 07:09:11 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Rdoc allowing arbitrary HTML
11838 07/08/02 10:07:35 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11839 07/08/02 13:52:21 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11840 07/08/02 23:22:58 [znmeb cesmail.n] Bullet points on Ruby 1.8 vs. 1.9 language??
11841 07/08/02 23:32:06 [james grayprodu] Re: Bullet points on Ruby 1.8 vs. 1.9 language??
11842 07/08/03 08:53:00 [david davidflan] Re: Bullet points on Ruby 1.8 vs. 1.9 language??
11843 07/08/03 15:20:24 [pat polycrystal] [PATCH] Curses - add default_color() routines
11844 07/08/04 04:13:37 [zimbatm oree.ch] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11845 07/08/04 04:31:27 [evan fallingsno] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11846 07/08/04 04:45:22 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11847 07/08/05 06:46:03 [halostatue gmai] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11848 07/08/05 13:30:56 [sheepman sheepm] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11849 07/08/07 01:03:05 [fygrave gmail.c] Mac OSX singleton
11850 07/08/07 01:29:50 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Mac OSX singleton -------------------------
11851 07/08/07 01:42:35 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Mac OSX singleton
11852 07/08/07 03:37:13 [david davidflan] continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11853 07/08/07 05:30:08 [binary42 gmail.] Re: continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11854 07/08/07 17:24:41 [abhisek rubyfor] [PATCH] ext/Win32API - Manual FreeLibrary support
11855 07/08/07 18:38:09 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11856 07/08/07 21:27:13 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [PATCH] ext/Win32API - Manual FreeLibrary support
11857 07/08/07 22:56:35 [chad chadfowler] Re: continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11858 07/08/07 23:18:18 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11859 07/08/07 23:28:02 [binary42 gmail.] Re: continuations in Ruby 1.9?
11860 07/08/08 05:08:43 [james grayprodu] Is this really what we want?
11861 07/08/08 05:52:40 [mrueckert suse.] Re: Planning to release 1.8.6 errata
11862 07/08/08 07:41:39 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Is this really what we want?
11863 07/08/08 10:00:30 [nobu ruby-lang.] REXML changes
11864 07/08/09 02:22:37 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Is this really what we want?
11865 07/08/09 02:40:18 [james grayprodu] Re: Is this really what we want?
11866 07/08/09 02:47:00 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Is this really what we want?
11867 07/08/09 02:52:40 [james grayprodu] Re: Is this really what we want?
11868 07/08/09 03:04:02 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Is this really what we want?
11869 07/08/09 03:07:18 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Is this really what we want?
11870 07/08/09 03:38:16 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Is this really what we want?
11871 07/08/09 04:00:02 [hadmut danisch.] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects
11872 07/08/09 04:55:28 [ruby dougle.tom] Re: ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects
11873 07/08/09 06:06:52 [david davidflan] Thread.abort_on_exception= in Ruby 1.9
11874 07/08/09 06:21:15 [david davidflan] Re: Thread.abort_on_exception= in Ruby 1.9
11875 07/08/09 07:07:46 [hadmut danisch.] Re: ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects -------------------------
11876 07/08/09 08:38:41 [david davidflan] priorities of newly-created threads
11877 07/08/09 09:06:30 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Thread.abort_on_exception= in Ruby 1.9
11878 07/08/09 10:06:39 [nakahiro sarion] Re: ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects
11879 07/08/09 12:28:34 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Thread.abort_on_exception= in Ruby 1.9
11880 07/08/10 04:10:47 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Thread.abort_on_exception= in Ruby 1.9
11881 07/08/10 09:46:09 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: priorities of newly-created threads
11882 07/08/10 13:53:59 [david davidflan] Re: priorities of newly-created threads
11883 07/08/10 14:15:41 [david davidflan] Re: priorities of newly-created threads
11884 07/08/10 15:28:44 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: priorities of newly-created threads
11885 07/08/10 15:31:42 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: priorities of newly-created threads
11886 07/08/10 23:15:39 [Daniel.Berger q] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron
11887 07/08/10 23:28:07 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron
11888 07/08/10 23:35:28 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron
11889 07/08/10 23:50:44 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron
11890 07/08/13 13:45:45 [asari.ruby gmai] Ruby and Solaris door library
11891 07/08/13 16:41:12 [charles.nutter ] Behavior of local_variables in Ruby 1.8 vs 1.9
11892 07/08/14 09:00:45 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11893 07/08/14 18:07:01 [B.Candler pobox] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform
11894 07/08/14 19:17:17 [lists bertram-s] IO#seek and whence problem
11895 07/08/14 19:26:26 [lists bertram-s] Re: IO#seek and whence problem
11896 07/08/14 22:03:52 [asari.ruby gmai] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11897 07/08/15 00:34:55 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11898 07/08/15 05:59:30 [steven lumos.us] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11899 07/08/15 06:50:01 [hadmut danisch.] pack/unpack 64bit Integers
11900 07/08/15 06:58:58 [szabgab gmail.c] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? -------------------------
11901 07/08/15 07:14:23 [asari.ruby gmai] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11902 07/08/15 14:28:26 [ville.mattila s] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11903 07/08/15 14:45:20 [B.Candler pobox] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers
11904 07/08/15 14:48:23 [B.Candler pobox] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers
11905 07/08/15 17:38:38 [lists bertram-s] Re: IO#seek and whence problem
11906 07/08/15 18:39:10 [B.Candler pobox] Re: IO#seek and whence problem
11907 07/08/15 18:55:08 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby?
11908 07/08/15 19:43:24 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11909 07/08/15 20:33:29 [vincent.isambar] Re: missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby?
11910 07/08/15 22:30:51 [binary42 gmail.] Re: missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby?
11911 07/08/15 22:53:37 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11912 07/08/16 14:04:53 [szabgab gmail.c] Re: missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby?
11913 07/08/16 20:27:18 [lists bertram-s] Re: IO#seek and whence problem
11914 07/08/16 21:45:59 [asari.ruby gmai] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11915 07/08/16 23:23:26 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11916 07/08/17 02:21:48 [sroberts uniser] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11917 07/08/17 02:28:33 [steven lumos.us] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11918 07/08/17 13:07:47 [znmeb cesmail.n] Latest benchmark results
11919 07/08/18 00:20:21 [hadmut danisch.] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers
11920 07/08/18 00:27:13 [B.Candler pobox] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers
11921 07/08/18 03:45:06 [jflam microsoft] Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11922 07/08/18 04:08:45 [vincent.isambar] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11923 07/08/18 04:10:17 [vincent.isambar] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11924 07/08/18 04:10:41 [jflam microsoft] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11925 07/08/18 04:12:06 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda -------------------------
11926 07/08/18 06:06:45 [B.Candler pobox] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11927 07/08/18 07:40:43 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11928 07/08/18 09:55:31 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda
11929 07/08/18 10:57:31 [asari.ruby gmai] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11930 07/08/18 19:48:18 [robert.dober gm] Bug in select?
11931 07/08/19 00:04:13 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Bug in select?
11932 07/08/19 00:16:31 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Bug in select?
11933 07/08/19 02:13:22 [robert.dober gm] Re: Bug in select?
11934 07/08/19 06:46:33 [florgro gmail.c] Re: Bug in select?
11935 07/08/20 09:04:29 [Tomas.Matousek ] Lambda return value
11936 07/08/20 20:30:09 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11937 07/08/20 23:37:11 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11938 07/08/21 00:27:24 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11939 07/08/21 01:42:09 [asari.ruby gmai] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11940 07/08/21 03:35:53 [ayyappank manii] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11941 07/08/21 04:12:55 [B.Candler pobox] Re: Hijacked thread
11942 07/08/21 05:02:53 [charles.nutter ] Re: Behavior of local_variables in Ruby 1.8 vs 1.9
11943 07/08/21 09:19:57 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
11944 07/08/21 23:45:14 [ko1 atdot.net ] Freenode#ruby-core
11945 07/08/22 00:46:38 [szabgab gmail.c] Smoke testing Ruby
11946 07/08/22 03:39:04 [meinrad.recheis] Re: Smoke testing Ruby
11947 07/08/22 10:00:31 [jos catnook.com] Splatting MatchData bug?
11948 07/08/22 16:12:09 [david davidflan] Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11949 07/08/22 20:38:56 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11950 07/08/22 20:50:12 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? -------------------------
11951 07/08/22 23:46:57 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11952 07/08/23 00:51:17 [mental rydia.ne] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11953 07/08/23 00:56:33 [nigel maven-gro] Range Equality
11954 07/08/23 00:57:01 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11955 07/08/23 01:05:04 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Range Equality
11956 07/08/23 01:10:09 [haisenko comdas] Re: Range Equality
11957 07/08/23 03:43:34 [david davidflan] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11958 07/08/23 03:45:02 [mental rydia.ne] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11959 07/08/23 03:47:41 [david davidflan] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11960 07/08/23 03:49:51 [david davidflan] coroutines with Fiber::Core
11961 07/08/23 04:06:02 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: coroutines with Fiber::Core
11962 07/08/23 04:15:10 [david davidflan] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11963 07/08/23 04:22:40 [david davidflan] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11964 07/08/23 04:52:44 [wilsonb gmail.c] Re: Smoke testing Ruby
11965 07/08/23 05:55:50 [david davidflan] Re: coroutines with Fiber::Core
11966 07/08/23 06:30:46 [mental rydia.ne] Re: coroutines with Fiber::Core
11967 07/08/23 06:34:24 [mental rydia.ne] Re: coroutines with Fiber::Core
11968 07/08/23 06:39:43 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: coroutines with Fiber::Core
11969 07/08/23 07:51:34 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11970 07/08/23 10:17:28 [dan-ml dan42.co] [BUG] DateTime#sec_fraction
11971 07/08/23 14:21:51 [sroberts uniser] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11972 07/08/23 15:49:57 [david davidflan] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11973 07/08/23 18:13:56 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Smoke testing Ruby
11974 07/08/23 20:47:17 [garbagecat10 gm] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11975 07/08/23 22:39:43 [zimbatm oree.ch] Re: Method introspection ? -------------------------
11976 07/08/23 23:34:09 [B.Candler pobox] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
11977 07/08/24 02:28:02 [Tomas.Matousek ] Bug in exception message initialization
11978 07/08/24 07:40:04 [Daniel.Berger q] First class labels?
11979 07/08/24 07:55:26 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: First class labels?
11980 07/08/24 13:13:46 [evan fallingsno] Re: First class labels?
11981 07/08/24 15:28:26 [dave.pederson g] Inverse Square Root
11982 07/08/24 17:21:38 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Inverse Square Root
11983 07/08/25 02:30:29 [dave.pederson g] Re: Inverse Square Root
11984 07/08/25 03:15:58 [david davidflan] send! instead of funcall
11985 07/08/25 04:08:15 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: send! instead of funcall
11986 07/08/25 05:29:19 [dblack rubypal.] Re: send! instead of funcall
11987 07/08/25 09:49:24 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: send! instead of funcall
11988 07/08/25 17:22:32 [vincent.isambar] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11989 07/08/25 17:54:20 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11990 07/08/25 18:01:32 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11991 07/08/25 20:20:05 [mneumann ntecs.] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11992 07/08/25 20:36:16 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11993 07/08/26 00:51:00 [halostatue gmai] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11994 07/08/26 01:17:20 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11995 07/08/26 02:01:20 [jupp gmx.de ] Re: Inverse Square Root
11996 07/08/26 02:08:59 [martindemello g] Re: Inverse Square Root
11997 07/08/26 04:14:17 [halostatue gmai] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9
11998 07/08/26 04:59:08 [drbrain segment] $SAFE = 1 and insecure method on 1.8 vs 1.9
11999 07/08/26 10:39:53 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9?
12000 07/08/26 12:11:36 [ko1 atdot.net ] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? -------------------------