ruby_core (11601-11800)

 < ^ > 
11601 07/07/07 06:18:30 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Optimizing Symbol#to_proc
11602 07/07/07 06:29:22 [wilsonb gmail.c] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11603 07/07/07 07:14:58 [calamitates gma] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11604 07/07/07 09:03:00 [transfire gmail] Re: Add args to Singleton instance method?
11605 07/07/07 16:00:35 [jflam microsoft] Re: Array#values_at bug?
11606 07/07/07 16:41:44 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Optimizing Symbol#to_proc
11607 07/07/07 20:05:16 [murphy rubychan] Re: Optimizing Symbol#to_proc
11608 07/07/07 21:04:28 [dblack rubypal.] Re: Array#values_at bug?
11609 07/07/07 21:38:51 [transfire gmail] GetoptLong w/ DSL
11610 07/07/08 06:05:44 [charles.nutter ] Re: Array#values_at bug?
11611 07/07/08 16:49:15 [ko1 atdot.net ] Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11612 07/07/08 16:59:59 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11613 07/07/08 21:23:54 [transfire gmail] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11614 07/07/08 22:11:14 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11615 07/07/08 22:29:24 [murphy rubychan] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11616 07/07/08 22:30:32 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11617 07/07/08 22:35:10 [transfire gmail] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11618 07/07/09 03:37:31 [chneukirchen gm] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11619 07/07/09 09:53:24 [transfire gmail] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11620 07/07/09 13:16:00 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11621 07/07/09 14:33:30 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11622 07/07/09 15:41:02 [charles.nutter ] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11623 07/07/09 23:29:14 [transfire gmail] Re: GetoptLong w/ DSL
11624 07/07/10 00:27:03 [charles.nutter ] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11625 07/07/10 00:41:21 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9 -------------------------
11626 07/07/10 00:45:46 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11627 07/07/10 04:47:15 [vincent.isambar] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11628 07/07/10 08:59:35 [djberg96 gmail.] Question about String#intern, $SAFE level
11629 07/07/10 09:58:38 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Question about String#intern, $SAFE level
11630 07/07/10 10:56:12 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Question about String#intern, $SAFE level
11631 07/07/11 07:52:07 [tmorgan99 gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11632 07/07/11 11:55:32 [rocky.bernstein] Change to pretty-print hash (PP.pp_hash) so keys appear in sorted order
11633 07/07/11 13:30:53 [akr fsij.org ] Re: Change to pretty-print hash (PP.pp_hash) so keys appear in sorted order
11634 07/07/11 15:43:47 [charles.nutter ] Re: Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super?
11635 07/07/12 02:35:34 [jflam microsoft] to_str conversions and exceptions
11636 07/07/12 02:51:36 [charles.nutter ] Re: to_str conversions and exceptions
11637 07/07/12 04:22:18 [florgro gmail.c] Re: to_str conversions and exceptions
11638 07/07/12 04:59:24 [transfire gmail] Re: Add args to Singleton instance method?
11639 07/07/12 05:55:15 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11640 07/07/12 13:33:00 [jflam microsoft] Re: to_str conversions and exceptions
11642 07/07/13 15:18:25 [marcel vernix.o] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11643 07/07/13 15:33:10 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11644 07/07/13 15:34:09 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11645 07/07/13 15:42:06 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11646 07/07/13 15:48:19 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11647 07/07/13 15:55:40 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11648 07/07/13 16:02:08 [jlam iunknown.c] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11649 07/07/13 16:03:54 [w.kelly qut.edu] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11650 07/07/13 16:09:40 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords -------------------------
11651 07/07/13 16:20:15 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11652 07/07/13 16:32:22 [evanwebb gmail.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11653 07/07/13 16:33:30 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11654 07/07/13 16:40:13 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11655 07/07/13 16:40:57 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11656 07/07/13 16:44:37 [evan fallingsno] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11657 07/07/13 17:10:55 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11658 07/07/13 23:03:27 [james grayprodu] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11659 07/07/13 23:10:45 [transfire gmail] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11660 07/07/13 23:12:44 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11661 07/07/13 23:35:20 [james grayprodu] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11662 07/07/14 00:10:37 [florgro gmail.c] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11664 07/07/14 00:17:10 [florgro gmail.c] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11666 07/07/14 03:53:57 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11667 07/07/14 04:02:10 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11668 07/07/14 04:04:01 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11670 07/07/14 04:11:16 [james grayprodu] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11671 07/07/14 04:50:22 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11673 07/07/14 05:14:02 [transfire gmail] Inheritable mixin
11674 07/07/14 05:56:50 [steven lumos.us] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11675 07/07/14 06:16:54 [james grayprodu] ri File Broken in 1.8.6 -------------------------
11676 07/07/14 06:20:19 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11677 07/07/14 06:22:26 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11678 07/07/14 06:23:24 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: ri File Broken in 1.8.6
11679 07/07/14 06:25:32 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11680 07/07/14 06:35:31 [james grayprodu] Re: ri File Broken in 1.8.6
11681 07/07/14 06:52:18 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11682 07/07/14 10:21:07 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11684 07/07/14 11:36:05 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Inheritable mixin
11685 07/07/14 11:41:01 [warlickt operis] Re: Inheritable mixin
11686 07/07/14 12:24:44 [cdcarter gmail.] Re: Inheritable mixin
11687 07/07/14 14:00:43 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Inheritable mixin
11688 07/07/14 17:21:53 [transfire gmail] Re: Inheritable mixin
11689 07/07/14 17:32:20 [transfire gmail] Re: Inheritable mixin
11690 07/07/15 00:39:12 [cdcarter gmail.] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11691 07/07/15 10:08:31 [florgro gmail.c] rb_cstr_to_inum use of strtoul as an optimization has unfortunate side effects
11692 07/07/16 00:27:37 [florgro gmail.c] String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11693 07/07/16 02:07:44 [florgro gmail.c] Re: rb_cstr_to_inum use of strtoul as an optimization has unfortunate side effects
11694 07/07/16 03:38:48 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11695 07/07/16 03:46:05 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: rb_cstr_to_inum use of strtoul as an optimization has unfortunate side effects
11696 07/07/16 05:55:35 [florgro gmail.c] Re: rb_cstr_to_inum use of strtoul as an optimization has unfortunate side effects
11697 07/07/16 06:06:22 [florgro gmail.c] Re: String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11698 07/07/16 06:07:58 [florgro gmail.c] Re: rb_cstr_to_inum use of strtoul as an optimization has unfortunate side effects
11699 07/07/16 09:47:18 [jflam microsoft] What are the semantics of to_str?
11701 07/07/16 11:34:07 [jflam microsoft] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11702 07/07/16 11:53:22 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11703 07/07/16 12:57:08 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11704 07/07/16 14:18:02 [florgro gmail.c] Re: String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11705 07/07/16 14:23:11 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11706 07/07/16 15:58:55 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: String#rindex(other) doesn't try to convert other via to_str
11707 07/07/16 16:01:47 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11708 07/07/16 16:20:54 [akr fsij.org ] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11709 07/07/16 16:34:18 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11710 07/07/16 19:48:52 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11711 07/07/16 20:12:52 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11712 07/07/16 23:52:54 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11713 07/07/16 23:52:57 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11714 07/07/17 00:51:52 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11716 07/07/17 05:10:58 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11718 07/07/17 07:12:35 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11719 07/07/17 07:23:09 [nicksieger gmai] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11720 07/07/17 07:49:16 [cwailes2 uiuc.e] [PATCH] XMLRPC::ModRubyServer
11721 07/07/17 08:23:13 [charles.nutter ] Re: What are the semantics of to_str?
11722 07/07/17 09:39:34 [florgro gmail.c] Re: What are the semantics of to_str?
11723 07/07/17 09:56:50 [transfire gmail] Re: Inheritable mixin
11724 07/07/17 11:55:36 [python152 gmail] ruby extension help
11725 07/07/17 15:03:16 [charles.nutter ] Re: What are the semantics of to_str? -------------------------
11726 07/07/17 15:26:21 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: ruby extension help
11727 07/07/17 17:26:30 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11728 07/07/17 21:31:20 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11729 07/07/17 21:34:00 [python152 gmail] Re: ruby extension help
11730 07/07/17 22:24:00 [james grayprodu] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11731 07/07/18 00:15:33 [vincent.isambar] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11732 07/07/18 00:23:14 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: ruby extension help
11733 07/07/18 00:25:19 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11734 07/07/18 00:26:23 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11735 07/07/18 00:35:24 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11736 07/07/18 00:45:34 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11737 07/07/18 01:38:51 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11738 07/07/18 03:43:02 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11739 07/07/18 03:56:58 [brent mbari.org] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11740 07/07/18 06:37:43 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11741 07/07/18 06:42:51 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11742 07/07/18 06:58:52 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11743 07/07/18 07:55:10 [jflam microsoft] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11744 07/07/18 08:22:45 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11745 07/07/18 08:34:20 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11746 07/07/18 09:30:34 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11747 07/07/18 10:41:25 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11748 07/07/18 11:10:25 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11749 07/07/18 11:43:48 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11750 07/07/18 12:18:06 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords -------------------------
11751 07/07/18 14:09:09 [charles.nutter ] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11752 07/07/18 17:26:41 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11753 07/07/18 22:17:40 [calamitates gma] Re: Proposal: runtime-modifying Kernel methods should be keywords
11754 07/07/19 03:25:49 [ryand-ruby zens] indentation / emacs woes
11755 07/07/19 05:43:44 [charles.nutter ] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11756 07/07/19 06:18:53 [Ara.T.Howard no] [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11757 07/07/19 06:25:19 [ceo hawthorne-p] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11758 07/07/19 06:59:14 [vjoel path.berk] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11759 07/07/19 07:18:14 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11760 07/07/19 14:27:57 [ville.mattila s] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11761 07/07/19 18:39:51 [vincent.isambar] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11762 07/07/19 18:52:59 [ceo hawthorne-p] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11763 07/07/20 01:47:17 [brabuhr gmail.c] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11764 07/07/20 01:59:01 [benschumacher g] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11765 07/07/20 02:12:58 [brabuhr gmail.c] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11766 07/07/20 02:47:50 [steven lumos.us] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11767 07/07/20 03:31:16 [david davidflan] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11768 07/07/20 04:09:25 [ml syntheticpla] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11769 07/07/20 04:37:40 [ceo hawthorne-p] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11770 07/07/20 12:03:23 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: indentation / emacs woes
11771 07/07/20 13:45:44 [ara.t.howard gm] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11772 07/07/20 15:36:37 [ml syntheticpla] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11773 07/07/20 23:18:37 [brabuhr gmail.c] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11774 07/07/20 23:46:10 [ara.t.howard gm] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11775 07/07/21 10:40:47 [brabuhr gmail.c] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux -------------------------
11776 07/07/21 12:41:44 [ara.t.howard gm] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11777 07/07/22 09:30:58 [rm_rails cheapc] Bug? array.push(*array) segfault
11778 07/07/22 11:00:02 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Bug? array.push(*array) segfault
11779 07/07/23 01:58:44 [chad chadfowler] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11780 07/07/23 02:09:25 [chad chadfowler] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11781 07/07/23 05:13:16 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11782 07/07/23 09:26:06 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11783 07/07/23 09:30:08 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11784 07/07/23 16:47:27 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11785 07/07/23 16:57:20 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11786 07/07/23 19:03:40 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11787 07/07/24 03:49:57 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11788 07/07/24 05:41:38 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11789 07/07/24 07:33:16 [ara.t.howard gm] Re: [BUG] threads and heavy io on osx and linux
11790 07/07/24 09:32:48 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11791 07/07/24 11:43:59 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11792 07/07/24 11:57:26 [drbrain segment] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11793 07/07/24 14:34:14 [transfire gmail] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11794 07/07/24 22:44:53 [nakahiro sarion] Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
11795 07/07/24 22:59:53 [nakahiro sarion] What libraries to be unbundled?
11796 07/07/25 00:30:42 [ggarra advanced] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11797 07/07/25 03:39:38 [david davidflan] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11798 07/07/25 03:46:11 [james grayprodu] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11799 07/07/25 04:06:22 [david davidflan] Re: What libraries to be unbundled?
11800 07/07/25 04:19:01 [blowmage gmail.] Re: What libraries to be unbundled? -------------------------