ruby_core (11401-11600)

 < ^ > 
11401 07/06/05 13:37:08 [david davidflan] Proc.==
11402 07/06/05 14:11:21 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Proc.==
11403 07/06/05 14:57:47 [david davidflan] Re: Proc.==
11404 07/06/05 15:25:05 [drbrain segment] Re: Proc.==
11405 07/06/05 23:47:00 [murphy rubychan] JSON/YAML: Different Interface?
11406 07/06/06 01:16:13 [flori nixe.ping] [PATCH] Some small bug fixes for Ruby 1.9
11407 07/06/06 03:16:56 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [PATCH] Some small bug fixes for Ruby 1.9
11408 07/06/06 03:48:02 [david davidflan] Re: Proc.==
11409 07/06/06 06:14:09 [zimbatm oree.ch] Method introspection ?
11410 07/06/06 06:32:44 [drbrain segment] Re: Proc.==
11411 07/06/06 06:38:08 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Proc.==
11412 07/06/06 06:39:04 [david davidflan] Re: Method introspection ?
11413 07/06/06 06:40:53 [nex342 gmail.co] Re: Proc.==
11414 07/06/06 06:46:26 [mmiller hick.or] Re: Method introspection ?
11415 07/06/06 06:52:14 [david davidflan] Re: Proc.==
11416 07/06/06 06:59:24 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Proc.==
11417 07/06/06 08:29:35 [flori nixe.ping] Re: [PATCH] Another small bug fix for Ruby 1.9 and a request for clarification
11418 07/06/06 09:34:35 [david davidflan] currying in Ruby
11419 07/06/06 09:46:28 [vshepelev imho.] Re: currying in Ruby
11420 07/06/06 13:37:41 [david davidflan] Re: currying in Ruby
11421 07/06/06 13:51:42 [vshepelev imho.] Re: currying in Ruby
11422 07/06/06 20:51:26 [jan.svitok gmai] Re: Planning to release 1.8.6 errata
11423 07/06/07 10:05:13 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Patching win32 ruby fopen/opendir/stat/rename/unlink to work with UTF8 paths?
11424 07/06/07 11:59:23 [naruse airemix.] Re: JSON/YAML: Different Interface?
11426 07/06/07 22:55:46 [florgro gmail.c] Odd beaviour with Fixnum#div on negative numbers with floats
11427 07/06/08 14:50:12 [brent mbari.org] Re: $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC
11428 07/06/08 20:24:47 [lists bertram-s] Re: Odd beaviour with Fixnum#div on negative numbers with floats
11429 07/06/09 13:03:47 [djberg96 gmail.] Thread test failure with 1.8.6-p36, OS X
11430 07/06/09 13:56:38 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Thread test failure with 1.8.6-p36, OS X
11431 07/06/12 01:02:03 [jflam microsoft] Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?
11432 07/06/12 02:45:40 [jan.svitok gmai] Re: Bugs that can be closed
11433 07/06/12 03:10:17 [ntalbott gmail.] Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?
11434 07/06/12 09:02:11 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?
11435 07/06/12 10:56:46 [charles.nutter ] Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?
11436 07/06/12 11:46:16 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Bugs that can be closed
11437 07/06/12 12:27:18 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Bugs that can be closed
11438 07/06/12 12:50:32 [jflam microsoft] Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?
11439 07/06/12 15:32:38 [nakahiro sarion] comments needed for Random class
11440 07/06/13 06:27:14 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: comments needed for Random class
11441 07/06/13 07:03:27 [david davidflan] Re: comments needed for Random class
11442 07/06/13 09:26:41 [transfire gmail] Re: comments needed for Random class
11443 07/06/13 09:37:57 [ggarra advanced] Re: comments needed for Random class
11444 07/06/13 09:48:32 [ggarra advanced] Re: comments needed for Random class
11445 07/06/13 16:12:26 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: comments needed for Random class
11446 07/06/13 18:11:47 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: comments needed for Random class
11447 07/06/13 22:49:44 [meinrad.recheis] Re: comments needed for Random class
11448 07/06/13 22:59:42 [steven.jenkins ] Re: comments needed for Random class
11449 07/06/14 03:52:10 [steven lumos.us] Re: comments needed for Random class
11450 07/06/14 04:29:04 [david davidflan] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) -------------------------
11451 07/06/14 05:36:46 [meinrad.recheis] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11452 07/06/14 06:55:19 [david davidflan] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11453 07/06/14 07:39:50 [transfire gmail] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11454 07/06/14 08:09:47 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11455 07/06/14 09:40:46 [meinrad.recheis] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11456 07/06/14 16:18:03 [alex blackkettl] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11457 07/06/14 22:02:48 [sylvain.joyeux ] Inclusion of bug #9376 in 1.8.6 branch
11458 07/06/15 00:22:06 [rick.denatale g] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11459 07/06/15 00:52:37 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11460 07/06/15 01:14:03 [rick.denatale g] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11461 07/06/15 02:39:02 [david davidflan] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11462 07/06/15 07:38:42 [jflam microsoft] What should this code do?
11463 07/06/15 07:50:00 [transfire gmail] Re: What should this code do?
11464 07/06/15 08:01:01 [mental rydia.ne] Re: What should this code do?
11465 07/06/15 08:05:57 [jflam microsoft] Re: What should this code do?
11466 07/06/15 08:21:34 [transfire gmail] Re: What should this code do?
11467 07/06/15 08:37:37 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11468 07/06/15 10:08:22 [charles.nutter ] Re: What should this code do?
11469 07/06/15 23:02:30 [florgro gmail.c] Array#slice!() expands array inconsistently
11470 07/06/16 07:28:20 [florgro gmail.c] Taint mode for arrays
11471 07/06/16 11:02:36 [nakahiro sarion] Re: comments needed for Random class
11472 07/06/16 12:01:45 [djberg96 gmail.] Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method
11473 07/06/16 12:43:31 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: comments needed for Random class
11474 07/06/16 17:24:31 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method
11475 07/06/16 17:59:15 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: UPDATED: Building 1.8.6-p36 with Sun Studio 12 compiler -------------------------
11476 07/06/16 21:05:01 [djberg96 gmail.] Re: Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method
11477 07/06/16 22:09:28 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method
11478 07/06/16 22:56:00 [robert.dober gm] Error in ancestor?
11479 07/06/16 23:24:12 [rick.denatale g] Re: Error in ancestor?
11480 07/06/17 00:45:19 [robert.dober gm] Re: Error in ancestor?
11481 07/06/17 01:34:39 [robert.dober gm] Ancestors for Singleton classes
11482 07/06/17 02:58:22 [james grayprodu] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11483 07/06/17 03:59:05 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11484 07/06/17 04:41:27 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11485 07/06/17 05:14:22 [florgro gmail.c] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11486 07/06/17 06:23:30 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: comments needed for Random class
11487 07/06/17 07:20:29 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Inclusion of bug #9376 in 1.8.6 branch
11488 07/06/17 08:14:15 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Inclusion of bug #9376 in 1.8.6 branch
11489 07/06/17 08:37:17 [steven lumos.us] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11490 07/06/17 08:53:12 [transfire gmail] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11491 07/06/17 13:11:11 [james grayprodu] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11492 07/06/17 13:11:33 [james grayprodu] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11493 07/06/17 15:45:04 [david davidflan] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11494 07/06/17 18:58:09 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11495 07/06/17 19:10:42 [transfire gmail] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11496 07/06/17 19:22:37 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11497 07/06/17 19:25:57 [vincent.isambar] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11498 07/06/17 22:02:37 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters
11499 07/06/19 00:20:01 [djberg96 gmail.] Can't build extensions with g++
11500 07/06/19 00:47:32 [mynamewasgone g] Re: Can't build extensions with g++ -------------------------
11501 07/06/19 00:58:30 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Inclusion of bug #9376 in 1.8.6 branch
11502 07/06/19 08:04:52 [steven lumos.us] Re: comments needed for Random class
11503 07/06/19 08:25:56 [steven lumos.us] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)
11504 07/06/19 20:01:57 [aljoscha weissh] Behaviour of Enumerables reject vs. select mixed into Hash
11505 07/06/20 15:11:00 [sylvain.joyeux ] Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11506 07/06/20 15:30:11 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11507 07/06/20 15:56:28 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Ancestors for Singleton classes
11508 07/06/20 16:01:04 [mynamewasgone g] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11509 07/06/20 16:11:35 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11510 07/06/20 17:08:03 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11511 07/06/20 18:03:28 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11512 07/06/20 18:11:47 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11513 07/06/20 18:24:26 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11514 07/06/20 18:44:51 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11515 07/06/20 22:37:24 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11516 07/06/20 22:41:20 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11517 07/06/20 23:00:36 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11518 07/06/21 01:12:58 [alexey.verkhovs] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11519 07/06/21 01:47:09 [hramrach centru] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11520 07/06/21 03:54:37 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Ancestors for Singleton classes
11521 07/06/21 06:25:13 [hramrach centru] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11522 07/06/21 12:35:47 [ser germane-sof] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11523 07/06/21 17:44:40 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11524 07/06/21 17:52:04 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11525 07/06/21 18:02:44 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle -------------------------
11526 07/06/21 18:31:28 [hgs dmu.ac.uk ] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
11527 07/06/23 00:00:19 [Daniel.Berger q] Unnecessary varargs for rb_hash_select
11528 07/06/23 00:54:50 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Unnecessary varargs for rb_hash_select
11529 07/06/24 05:57:02 [djberg96 gmail.] SignalException.new bugs
11530 07/06/24 06:39:28 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: SignalException.new bugs
11531 07/06/24 12:27:12 [denigeorge cse.] Bench mark programs
11532 07/06/24 13:57:56 [znmeb cesmail.n] Re: Bench mark programs
11533 07/06/25 07:04:55 [transfire gmail] method_missing for Enumerator
11534 07/06/25 14:57:50 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11535 07/06/26 03:30:06 [rick.denatale g] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11536 07/06/26 04:15:36 [transfire gmail] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11537 07/06/26 04:21:57 [transfire gmail] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11538 07/06/26 05:24:27 [rick.denatale g] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11539 07/06/26 08:42:15 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: method_missing for Enumerator
11540 07/06/27 21:35:25 [gaspard teti.ch] Efficient storage for messages
11541 07/06/28 02:04:11 [ryand-ruby zens] Re: Efficient storage for messages
11543 07/06/28 08:10:25 [james grayprodu] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11544 07/06/28 15:42:02 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11545 07/06/29 05:43:14 [jflam microsoft] Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11546 07/06/29 05:49:34 [mental rydia.ne] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11547 07/06/29 06:24:48 [jflam microsoft] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11548 07/06/29 06:27:21 [jflam microsoft] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes?
11549 07/06/29 06:42:49 [Daniel.Berger q] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11550 07/06/29 06:54:49 [mental rydia.ne] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances -------------------------
11553 07/06/29 07:38:22 [marcel vernix.o] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11554 07/06/29 08:01:57 [murphy rubychan] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11555 07/06/29 08:04:35 [wonado donnerwe] Name of Classes
11556 07/06/29 11:10:25 [florgro gmail.c] [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block
11557 07/06/29 11:40:09 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes?
11558 07/06/29 11:42:32 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Name of Classes
11559 07/06/29 11:44:30 [vjoel path.berk] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes?
11560 07/06/29 13:47:56 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances
11561 07/06/29 13:55:08 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block
11562 07/06/30 08:22:55 [florgro gmail.c] [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize()
11563 07/06/30 16:11:48 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize()
11564 07/06/30 18:51:59 [shyouhei ruby-l] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11565 07/07/01 01:56:13 [james grayprodu] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11566 07/07/01 04:27:52 [laurent.sansone] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11567 07/07/01 08:29:21 [florgro gmail.c] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block
11568 07/07/02 01:56:22 [florgro gmail.c] [BUG] String#rindex with Regexp in 1.9
11569 07/07/02 03:16:33 [florgro gmail.c] sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11570 07/07/02 03:48:29 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11571 07/07/02 04:01:14 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11572 07/07/02 04:12:30 [vincent.isambar] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11573 07/07/02 04:14:39 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough
11574 07/07/02 04:36:14 [vincent.isambar] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11575 07/07/02 05:20:31 [florgro gmail.c] Re: sprintf: Format specifier tokens aren't checked well enough -------------------------
11576 07/07/02 06:13:53 [florgro gmail.c] Array#delete is destructive, String#delete isn't
11577 07/07/02 07:09:13 [lyle.johnson gm] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11578 07/07/02 07:46:26 [matz ruby-lang.] Re: Array#delete is destructive, String#delete isn't
11579 07/07/02 07:52:53 [laurent.sansone] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11580 07/07/02 08:02:26 [laurent.sansone] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch
11581 07/07/02 08:30:36 [florgro gmail.c] Re: Array#delete is destructive, String#delete isn't
11582 07/07/02 09:16:01 [dan-ml dan42.co] Re: Array#delete is destructive, String#delete isn't
11583 07/07/02 10:36:21 [vjoel path.berk] Re: Array#delete is destructive, String#delete isn't
11584 07/07/02 21:38:23 [vincent.isambar] [PATCH] Problem with ruby 1.8.6-p36 (and p39) on Tiger
11585 07/07/03 10:27:13 [jflam microsoft] Array#values_at bug?
11586 07/07/03 16:26:01 [cfis savagexi.c] Is it possible to detect thread switches?
11587 07/07/03 18:35:18 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Is it possible to detect thread switches?
11588 07/07/04 01:41:54 [zhangyuanyi gma] Timeout doesn't work correctly under windows when executing complex regexp.
11589 07/07/04 07:26:08 [laurent.sansone] Re: Is it possible to detect thread switches?
11590 07/07/04 09:56:02 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Timeout doesn't work correctly under windows when executing complex regexp.
11591 07/07/04 10:07:26 [zhangyuanyi gma] Re: Array#values_at bug?
11592 07/07/04 10:14:06 [zhangyuanyi gma] Re: Timeout doesn't work correctly under windows when executing complex regexp.
11593 07/07/04 14:21:09 [vvlad vvlad.eu.] Data_Wrap_Struct for T_CLASS
11594 07/07/04 15:22:09 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Timeout doesn't work correctly under windows when executing complex regexp.
11595 07/07/04 15:30:16 [nobu ruby-lang.] Re: Data_Wrap_Struct for T_CLASS
11596 07/07/05 13:10:04 [esad.talks esse] Bug in CGI::unescapeHTML?
11597 07/07/06 20:13:00 [murphy rubychan] Optimizing Symbol#to_proc
11598 07/07/07 03:06:21 [sylvain.joyeux ] Re: Optimizing Symbol#to_proc
11599 07/07/07 05:01:45 [ceich62 gmail.c] Add args to Singleton instance method?
11600 07/07/07 05:57:13 [charles.nutter ] Bug in Kernel#method objects that call super? -------------------------