"Christoph Rippel" <crippel / primenet.com> writes:

> try to express this in Ruby - it is going to be a nightmare.

Perhaps you could help me understand the problem. The Ruby solution
would seem to my naive eyes about half the size an considerably
clearer. Without the need to jump through template hoops for type
safety, most of the issues of genericity seem to go away.

What am I missing?

Dave