Jim Menard <jimm / io.com> writes: > I'm switching over to using RubyGems. I like it! > > When I removed the "normal" Rake install and typed "gem --remote-install > rake", it succeeded with the message "Successfully installed rake version > 0.3.1". > > It took me a while to find the "rake" executable, though. It used to go in > /usr/local/bin/rake, but it looks like it is now in > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9/rake-0.3.1/lib/rake. ^^^ oops: bin > > Do all executables installed by gems go in the gem directory instead of > /usr/local? If so, I would like to suggest that gems put their executables in > /usr/local/ instead, so that users don't have to modify their paths by adding > a new directory each time they install a new gem. -- Jim Menard, jimm / io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/ "The world is divided into one group: those who start counting at 0, and those who don't." -- Unknown