On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:59:28 +0100, Anders Borch wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
>> "Charles Comstock" <cc1 / cec.wustl.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:c3r7ov$3g7$1 / newsreader.wustl.edu...
>> 
>>>I would probably prefer most library code to have similar conventions,
>>>but I generally chafe against restrictions which seem reasonably
>>>arbitrary like this one.  It's one of my chief reasons I never learned
>>>python that they had arbitrary rules like this.
>> 
>> 
>> How about a command line option for warnings?  Or someone provides a
>> Ruby-Lint that takes care of that.  I'd vote against hard enforcement
>> though.  It's not rubyish. :-)
> 
> ruby-lint is a much better idea. I'd put my vote on a ruby-lint in 
> stead. We should have had a ruby-lint a long time ago, maybe I'll have a 
> look at writing one :)
> 

Is Ruby-Lint, a static analysis tool ?

Ruby indeed needs that.

--
Simon Strandgaard