Is this a bug?
Shouldn't 'require' load both modules in this case?
If not, what is the motivation for doing so?

Just curious :-)

--
Simon Strandgaard


server> ls
a.rb
server> expand -t2 a.rb
require 'fileutils'

code = <<RUBY
puts "hello"
RUBY

FileUtils.mkdir("dir")
File.open("mod.rb", "w+") do |f| 
  f.write <<-RUBY
  puts "hello1"
  RUBY
end
FileUtils.cd("dir") do
  File.open("mod.rb", "w+") do |f|
    f.write <<-RUBY
    puts "hello2"
    RUBY
  end
end

require 'mod'
$:.unshift('dir')
require 'mod'
server> ruby a.rb
hello1
server> ls 
a.rb    dir/    mod.rb
server>

I would have expected it to output both 'hello1' and 'hello2'.