I have a similar difficulty trying to run rublog with mod_ruby on Apache. Apache is not using the Content-type field from the rublog output, instead it adds its own with type text/plain. So the web browser thinks it is receiving plain text. I used a proxy server to see the HTTP Response, it looks like: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 05:56:14 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.48 (Fedora) Connection: close Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 1c3b Content-type: text/html Last-modified: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> ... My setup: ruby 1.8.1 (2004-02-28) httpd 2.0.48-1.2 mod_ruby 1.1.2 rublog lastest CVS version[1] My httpd.conf: <IfModule mod_ruby.c> RubyRequire apache/ruby-run <Files *.rbx> SetHandler ruby-object RubyHandler Apache::RubyRun.instance RubyAddPath /home/aaa/apps/rublog/rublog Options ExecCGI </Files> </IfModule> Alias /blog "/home/aaa/docs/blog/cgi/rublog.rbx" For now I'll go back to running rublog as a cgi script. Regards, Rob [1] To prevent a security error when running rublog I had to change line 168 of FileEntries.rb from: Dir.glob(File.join(entry_dir.full_name, "*")).each do |filename| to: file_pattern = File.join(entry_dir.full_name, "*") file_pattern.untaint Dir.glob(file_pattern).each do |filename| --- "Dr. Ephemeron" <me / privacy.net> wrote: > Sorry, if this seems like a simple problem, but I have: > > Mandrake 9.2 > Apache 2.0.47 > mod_ruby 1.0.7 > eruby 1.0.5 > > mod_ruby is reported installed by Apache and I can make a test > *.rhtml file > in my html directory and it works fine. > > When put a *.rbx file in my cgi-bin directory and browse it with > Mozilla > 1.4, it prints, but it prints everything in the file like this: > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Content-type: text/html > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC ... > <html> > <head> > . > . > . > > It looks to me like it is probably an Apache setting that needs to be > changed, but I can't figure out which one. I am new to all of this > and > struggling just to get it operational so I can learn more. > > Thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youÃÓe looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com