Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik / us.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > Interesting. I didn't find this in the index of the Ruby Rocks 
Reference.
> > Any chance of indexing stuff in .../lib that you can get by require?
> 
> We ran out of space to put everything, so we discussed with Matz what
> the most used packages were and documented those.

Hmm. I've got 10 blank pages in the back of my book. :-)

> The good news is that lib/matrix.rb is a well documented package in
> the source.
> 
> I'm not sure what we could do in terms of indexing without also
> describing the package: after all, the index would basically just be a
> list of the .rb files in lib/.

Why not? IMHO, with the explanations about lack of space and what it is 
you are listing, that would be OK as a minimally sufficient but still very 
nice and (new-)user-friendly set of pointers.

By the way, if that's a standard size pickaxe on the Ruby Rocks cover, 
them is some *monster* Rubies next to it! Why, they're practically Ruby 
Rocks in their own right!

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)