Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:15:23 +0900 schrieb Dan Doel <djd15 / po.cwru.edu>: > benny wrote: > > >nevertheless my proposal wasn't {"a" => "b"} << "c => d" (analog to ["a"] << "b" ) but > >{"a" => "b"} << {"c" => "d"} > > > > > You can do this yourself: > > class Hash > alias_method :<<, :update > end > > - Dan > > yes, I know. it was only a suggestion to put it in the base syntax / a question why it is not in there. but thanx anyway :) benny