Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:15:23 +0900
schrieb Dan Doel <djd15 / po.cwru.edu>:

> benny wrote:
> 
> >nevertheless my proposal wasn't {"a" => "b"} << "c => d" (analog to ["a"] << "b" ) but 
> >{"a" => "b"} << {"c" => "d"}
> >  
> >
> You can do this yourself:
> 
> class Hash
>     alias_method :<<, :update
> end
> 
> - Dan
> 
> 

yes, I know. it was only a suggestion to put it in the  base syntax / a question why it is not in
there.

but thanx anyway :)

benny