On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:49:26 +0900, Ralph Mason wrote:
> One thing I have often wondered is why the ruby constructor isn't called
> new?

> In my laziness I would rather type  new than initialize.

> It seems clearer than initialize, and appears to work just fine. Perhaps
> both could be supported?

FWIW, in vim, I use !init and it types

  def initialize()
  end

This works for me.

-austin
--
austin ziegler    * austin / halostatue.ca * Toronto, ON, Canada
software designer * pragmatic programmer * 2004.01.14
                                         * 22.46.06