In article <4i666.240905$U46.7570799 / news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>,
  "Patrick Logan" <patrickdlogan / home.com> wrote:
>
> <aotto2 / my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:93a535$n76$1 / nnrp1.deja.com...
> >
> >   after Mirosoft create .NET , it's time to answer
> >
> >   have a look to:
> >
> >     http://home.t-online.de/home/aotto/mqcon_E.html
>
> The CO-process does not seem to support multiple languages in the same
OS
> process operating on a shared object model/space. That seems to be a
big
> advantage of .net
>
> CO-process appears to be based on multiple processes for everything.
Is
> communication based on sockets or some other network mechanism so the
> processes are host-independent? That'd be interesting and flexible,
but too
> heavyweight for many of the things you'd want to use .net for.


Hi,

  1) the solution for MqSeries has only 20 KB wich isn't heavyweight.
  2) One CO-Process is used to manage one "task" ( DB, Communication
     GUI-Interface, Appl-Server, ...) there is no need to write
     one task in more than one language, the benefit is that you
     can choose the right language for the task, and the clear
     and easy interface between the tasks


mfg

  aotto :)



Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/