On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, 7:45:15 AM, Daniel wrote:

>> >Oh, wait... how about "rdoc"?
>> >
>> 
>> I think I might sort of like that, except that
>> 1. Dave Thomas might not (probably would not) like it (See
>>    reasons 2 and 3)
>> 2. It might cause confusion
>> 3. "rdoc" is already a program name (processor for
>>    rdoc-enabled Ruby code)

> I didn't know that 'rdoc' was already the name of a program.  I tested
> 'rdoc' on my computer and I didn't get anything.  Am I supposed to have
> rdoc?  Why don't I have it?

> If rdoc is supposed to come with the standard ruby distribution, then
> maybe Dave will want to extend rdoc for the purposes described above...

RDoc is part of the standard distro now (after 1.8.0, in time for
1.8.1).  And Dave is enhancing it to become a more complete package.

Gavin