Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> 
> On Dec 16, 2003, at 13:28, Carter Thompson wrote:
> 
>     Absolutely! I'm currently very fluent with Perl and I'm struggling
>     with Ruby. Lack of adequate documentation is making my learning
>     experience more time consuming and somewhat more frustrating. More
>     Ruby documentation would significantly improve my Ruby experience.
> 
> 
> I'm working on one component of this as we speak. I just committed the 
> first Ruby interpreter source file with embedded documentation. Once 
> this task is finished, you'll be able to generate RDoc documentation of 
> all of Ruby (and any libraries that choose to participate). You'll also 
> have full 'ri' integration.

Thats awesome, the one thing I missed from perl was the way
perldoc would pick up newly-installed modules documentation.
	I think thats an incentive for module writers to write
  good doc too - if theres a standard tool that means people
might read it, its worth writing :)

Is the code in CVS anywhere?

-- 
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns