On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:49:38AM +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:46:02AM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:41:42 +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > > Now, why do we have to pick a creative name?  Why don't we pick a boring
> > > uncreative name that is easy to remember, like "rubydoc".
> > > 
> > > One beef I have with many OSS products is that they like choosing
> > > creative but uninformative names like "Evolution", or "Gimp".
> > 
> > GIMP isn't "uninformative." It's the GNU Image Manipulation Program.
> 
> It's unly informative if you already know that.  Like GNU or PINE.

- unly
+ only

I have no idea why my fingers mixed a "u" and an "o".

-- 
Daniel Carrera | "Software is like sex.  It's better when it's free".
PhD student.   | 
Math Dept. UMD |     -- Linus Torvalds