On Friday 28 November 2003 08:15 pm, Hal Fulton wrote:
> T. Onoma wrote:
> > but can anyone explain why we have pre and post if wrap does them both?
>
> I asked that, too. But after thinking about it, I decided it is
> probably better this way.
>
> If everything were "wrap" then you would have to look at the
> method body to see whether it was adding code before, after,
> or both.
>
> With pre and post, you know where it's adding code without
> looking beyond the "def" line.

okay. no biggy either way. just seems like less for ruby to parse if we don't 
really need them.

> > and what about super wrapping?
>
> Not sure what you mean.

ruby-talk:86487

> Hal