"ts" <decoux / moulon.inra.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:200311171717.hAHHH9408208 / moulon.inra.fr...
> >>>>> "R" == Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net> writes:
>
> R> Not from what you wrote: "super" invokes whatever is next in the
wrapping
> R> chain at whose end the original method resides.
>
>  Can you explain me why you see a problem with `super' but don't see a
>  problem with `def' ?

Well, def foo:wrap still defines a method, but if you insist, we can
change that, too.  :-))

Cheers

    robert