Gavin wrote:
> 
> Well, good attempt at putting together a comprehensive RCR, but I just
> don't see the point of what you're proposing.  Most comments you made
> about the proposal are value-neutral (e.g. simplifies language) rather
> than giving a positive reason to embrace the proposal.  I don't think
> the ideas would make Ruby better in an identifiable way.

thanks Gavin, i'll work on improving it in the positive manner you've suggested. (break out the lisp docs here, since in essence the flexibilities of lisp's uniformity is what i'm suggesting to embue to ruby)

-t0