Hi --

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Ryan Pavlik wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 08:11:26 +0900
> James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb / seemyemail.com> wrote:
> > Even though having the right pedigree is no guarantee that the
> > object was not (perhaps pathologically) munged at some point, with
> > critical methods removed/altered.
>
> As in the previous post, this is possible, but there is no incentive
> to do so.  If you want to break your own code, there are quicker and
> easier ways.

You must not be a big fan of class methods :-)


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack / wobblini.net        # New email address
work: blackdav / shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav