Scripsit illa aut ille im Bates¥© <tim / bates.id.au>:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:29:04AM +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:
> > Fulton's Third Law says that there is an exception to every rule,
> > except Fulton's Third Law.
> 
> So what your saying is, Fulton's Third Law has no exception? Does that
> not make the Law its own exception? And if it has an exception, does
> that not make the second clause paradoxical, or at least wrong?
> 
> Or was that the point?

Exactly that IS the point.