"Tim Bates" <tim / bates.id.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20030916231638.GA31636 / bates.id.au...
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:29:04AM +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:
> > Fulton's Third Law says that there is an exception to every rule,
> > except Fulton's Third Law.
>
> So what your saying is, Fulton's Third Law has no exception? Does that
> not make the Law its own exception? And if it has an exception, does
> that not make the second clause paradoxical, or at least wrong?
>
> Or was that the point?

=> Goedel

    robert