--Uu2n37VG4rOBDVuR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Feldt (feldt / ce.chalmers.se) wrote: > David Naseby <david.naseby / eonesolutions.com.au> skrev den Fri, 12 Sep 2003 > 08:33:27 +0900: > > >I think you might find ruby + borges + madeleine = memory hog. I don't > >believe it would scale well at all. That being said, its great to play with > >in toy applications, and another 2 gig of RAM shouldn't cost that much... > > > >I've got a toy version of amrita + borges going - I really like the > >combination, as the major advantages of borges (as I see them) are kept > >with > >session and state management, but pages become a lot more flexible with > >amrita generating them. > > > From your experience would you say Madeleine is the mem hog, > or Borges or Ruby or all of them combined? Borges can be a memory hog because of the way it keeps track of state and allows backtracking ... lots of Continuations. How much of a memory hog depends upon how much state you save, etc. > I don't see why in principle we shouldn't be able to > do this in Ruby; Python has Zope and Plone and they > seem to be used quite a lot. Well, with the careful tuning you would be able to get Borges to run without hogging a ton of memory, but it will still use more memory than a CGI-based app framework. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://segment7.net All messages signed with fingerprint: FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04 --Uu2n37VG4rOBDVuR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/YTVBMypVHHlsnwQRApWCAKCIcCEIhn7ObKu82Eja1xxOFRS2tACgtLqo UjCwFnal+j0Qflw/bPKkLbA r2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Uu2n37VG4rOBDVuR--