In article <E19v8tk-0000jp-00 / hal.virtalex.org>,
Default User  <vcharlie / mindspring.com> wrote:
: Is anyone working on either:
: 
: 1)  cleaning up the Ruby license, so users at least know CLEARLY what they 
: can and can't do with Ruby.  
: 
: (OR)
: 
: 2)  re-code the offending parts of the language so ownership and useage 
: rights are CLEAR.  
: 
: Without clarification, I can't use Ruby.  What a shame; it would have been a 
: great language . . .  

Don't suppose you can give a solid example of some of the language
in the Ruby license that you feel is offensive, can you?

(thought not)

--Dave