> -----Original Message-----
> From: Park Heesob [mailto:phasis / bcline.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:56 PM
> To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [ANN] sys-win32etc 0.0.4
> 
> 
> Hi,
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Berger, Daniel" <djberge / qwest.com>
> To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 6:19 AM
> Subject: [ANN] sys-win32etc 0.0.4
> 
> 
> ...
> > HELP WANTED
> > ============
> > Testing is much appreciated, especially for the optional 
> server name.
> >
> > Contrary to what I said in the docs, there is still one remaining 
> > issue. For reasons I cannot determine, the current code 
> results in a 
> > segfault
> when
> > run in conjunction with TestUnit (at least, it does on my WinXP Pro 
> > box). However, the vanilla test script (test.rb) works 
> fine.  Help on 
> > this peculiarity is definitely wanted.
> >
> I think It's due to invalid struct allocation method.
> Try following patch.
> 
> ===============================================================
> @@ -103,8 +103,10 @@
>     // This portion of code taken partially from a post by 
> Shashank Date.
>     // Also, the server name is automatically prepended to 
> the server name
>     // strictly for convenience.
> +   wchar_t wszTemp[MAX_PATH];
> +   gstruct = rb_struct_new(GroupStruct);
>     if(tserver != Qnil){
> -      wchar_t wszTemp[MAX_PATH];
> +
>        VALUE server = rb_str_new2("\\\\");
>        rb_str_concat(server,tserver);
>        mbstowcs(wszTemp, STR2CSTR(server), MAX_PATH);
> @@ -309,9 +311,11 @@
> 
>     VALUE r_auth_flags = rb_ary_new();
>     VALUE uid = Qnil;
> +   wchar_t wszTemp[MAX_PATH];
> 
> +   pstruct = rb_struct_new(PasswdStruct);
>     if(tserver != Qnil){
> -      wchar_t wszTemp[MAX_PATH];
> +
>        VALUE server = rb_str_new2("\\\\");
>        rb_str_concat(server,tserver); 
> ================================================================
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Park Heesob

Thanks!  That worked, though the wszTemp declaration didn't need to be
moved.  I don't really understand what was invalid about my struct
allocation before.

With both the memory leaks solved and the TestUnit issues worked out, I will
now release this as 0.1.0 (stable).  I'm also going to propose its
integration into the current Etc module for 1.8.1.

Thanks much.

Regards,

Dan