> Obviously it was a typographical error. But I was so
> much into the meaning of the stmt that I did not see
> through the sarcasm of others. Oh well, that√‘ what
> happens when you are naż◊e.

I was not being sarcastic; I honestly didn't see the "obvious" typo, or I would
not have asked.

> However, I will be willing
> to bet that most of the responder can ONLY speak one
> and no more than one natural language, English. Those
> are most of the time called North American.

Is this in any way relevant, or just an easy "slam" on North Americans?  Some
equally unflattering (and likely equally untrue) generalities may be made about
Europeans.