----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kurt M. Dresner" <kdresner / cs.utexas.edu>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Rite/Ruby2.0 & Ruby vs OCaml


> > think it this way: you code in the usual way, cause your code can be
> > interpreted.
> 
> But I thought that the interpreter was being dumped...

Not sure. I'd like to think bytecode compilation will
be optional.

In any case, there'll be some kind of interpreter, of course,
for the bytecodes if nothing else.

Hal

--
Hal Fulton
hal9000 / hypermetrics.com