Daniel Carrera wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:20:37AM +0900, dblack / superlink.net wrote:
> > > > IIMSN (it all makes sense now :-)
> > >
> > > Shouldn't that have been IAMSN? Or were you just proving your 
> point about
> > > being acronymically challenged?  ;-)
> > 
> > Groan.  I wasn't trying to prove my point (it was a mistake), 
> but I think
> > I did prove my point :-)
> 
> What is IAMSN?

(it all makes sense now ;-)