glauber wrote:
> [...]
> > While "by whom" may be overstatement, "for whom" is not: "for me", for
> > one.  I could never get comfortable with the Swiss Army Chainsaw way of
> > thinking, and was amazed and grateful when I ran across Ruby.  It is
> > this very tension between beauty & practicality that Ruby renders moot,
> > a false dichotomy.  Code tends toward compactness and readability at the
> > same time, expressiveness and simplicity at the same time.  It seems
> [...]
> 
> Wait until you take a look at Scheme!
> 
> glauber (quickly ducking for cover)

(Umm... (been (there.  (No (accounting for) (taste, eh.)))))

 ;-)