In article <3A411B7F.A5CED182 / iastate.edu>,
  Mark Slagell <ms / iastate.edu> wrote:
[...]
> While "by whom" may be overstatement, "for whom" is not: "for me", for
> one.  I could never get comfortable with the Swiss Army Chainsaw way of
> thinking, and was amazed and grateful when I ran across Ruby.  It is
> this very tension between beauty & practicality that Ruby renders moot,
> a false dichotomy.  Code tends toward compactness and readability at the
> same time, expressiveness and simplicity at the same time.  It seems
[...]

Wait until you take a look at Scheme!

glauber (quickly ducking for cover)

--
Glauber Ribeiro
theglauber / my-deja.com    http://www.myvehiclehistoryreport.com
"Opinions stated are my own and not representative of Experian"


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/