----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001 / sneakemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: Using & for arrays of objects


> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:21:42 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:
> 
> > 
> > "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001 / sneakemail.com> schrieb im
> > Newsbeitrag news:pan.2003.06.27.08.07.16.538696 / sneakemail.com...
> >> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:41:55 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:
> >> > "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001 / sneakemail.com> schrieb im
> >> >>
> >> >> There is no intersection(&) method.
> >> >
> >> > There is:
> >> > 07:31:22 [temp]: ri 'Array#&'
> >>
> >> I was refering to the code posted in the root of this thread.
> >> You can see that the adjustment I proposed uses Array#&.
> > 
> > Sorry, I don't seem to understand you.  The OP used Array#& and it is
> > defined.  What did you want to say with "There is no intersection(&)
> > method"?
> 
> OK.. What I meant with "no intersection method" was: That his class did
> not have a Trival#& method defined. I suggested him to use Array#& to 
> do the intersection for him.
> 
> Sorry, I am terrible at communition :-)

Apparently the only problem is that you are both
conversing in your "second" language, English.

Most of the misunderstandings on this list are
the result of the use of English by non-native
speakers.

I cannot criticize. :) I speak only English and
a few words of German.

Hal

--
Hal Fulton
hal9000 / hypermetrics.com