On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:21:42 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:

> 
> "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001 / sneakemail.com> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag news:pan.2003.06.27.08.07.16.538696 / sneakemail.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:41:55 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> > "Simon Strandgaard" <0bz63fz3m1qt3001 / sneakemail.com> schrieb im
>> >>
>> >> There is no intersection(&) method.
>> >
>> > There is:
>> > 07:31:22 [temp]: ri 'Array#&'
>>
>> I was refering to the code posted in the root of this thread.
>> You can see that the adjustment I proposed uses Array#&.
> 
> Sorry, I don't seem to understand you.  The OP used Array#& and it is
> defined.  What did you want to say with "There is no intersection(&)
> method"?

OK.. What I meant with "no intersection method" was: That his class did
not have a Trival#& method defined. I suggested him to use Array#& to 
do the intersection for him.

Sorry, I am terrible at communition :-)

--
Simon Strandgaard