On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:42:55PM +0900, Michael Campbell wrote:
> 
> > > > They are not type-less there are dynamically typed.
> > > > Doing 
> > > >  a = 1 + "1"
> > > > doesn't work in Ruby, but does in Perl, for example.
> 
> 
> Not to nit-pick here, but in perl aren't "1" and 1 the same type
> ("scalar") but different contexts?

Don't know much about Perl, but isn't "scalar" a context (the other
one being list)?

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

Whoa...I did a 'zcat /vmlinuz > /dev/audio' and I think I heard God...
	-- mikecd on #Linux