"Shashank Date" <sdate / everestkc.net> wrote in message news:<bc9uao$g0chk$1 / ID-194283.news.dfncis.de>...
> "Mauricio Fern?ndez" <batsman.geo / yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > I guess you meant that Ruby has *no* native threads but rather green
> > threads, etc...
> 
> I must be using wrong terminology here ... I meant to say OS independant.
> I thought "native" meant language supported ... but looks like it means OS
> supported. Thanks for correcting me. What is the correct term for language
> supported threading ? "Simulated threading" ? 

I think of it more as "Lack of threading." :)