----- Original Message -----
From: "Mauricio Fern?ndez" <batsman.geo / yahoo.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: Is Rubygarden's wiki restricted to English?


> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 02:12:19AM +0900, dblack / superlink.net wrote:
> > > Say I translate node FooBarBaz to language Xyz. Is it OK if I put the
> > > translation in FooBarBaz/XYZ or FooBarBaz/XyzTranlation? (for
reasonable
> > > values of 'Xyz' ;-)
> >
> > Or just translate "FooBarBaz" into the target language and call it
> > that :-)

:) I can do that...
    Spanish: ElFooBarBaz, German: DasFooBarBaz, Italian: IlFooBarBaz,
    French: LeFooBarBaz

> But it'd be nice to be able to mark the relation between the original
> and the translation. Perhaps a link at the top will do.
>
> Anyway, I feel this would pollute the namespace faster than /XYZ, so
> if there's any (strong) opinions on this I'd prefer to hear them now
> instead of getting the rants latter :-)

Let me request a clarification: Are you proposing to
translate existing English material into (an)other
language(s)? Or are you proposing to add *new*
non-English material?

Hal