On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:06:35PM +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > I'm using gcc 3.2.3 without any problem.  But I can't tell whether
> > 3.2.3 is OK, or just lucky I am.  Any report is welcome.
> 
> Just to clarify: Is that really 3.2.*3*?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/index.html
> would suggest this is not out yet?
> (Meanwhile I'm trying to rebuild rubicon on an alpha to get some
> more reports out to you, on how that performs.)

I believe he's using the following
batsman@kodos:~$ apt-cache show gcc-3.2
Package: gcc-3.2
Priority: standard
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 5504
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc / lists.debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Source: gcc-3.2 (1:3.2.3ds6-0pre7)
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre7
           ===========

Debian sometimes packages things directly from the CVS. 


-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

* gb notes that fdisk thinks his cdrom can store one terabyte
	-- Seen on #Linux