Hi,

In message "Re: inspect question/request"
    on 03/03/31, Julian Snitow <vangczung / yahoo.com> writes:

|> Who wants to undef "inspect"?
|
|If something, no matter how stupid, is possible, then someone, somewhere 
|  will do it.
|
|Perhaps in the absence of an inspect method (for whatever reason), a 
|fall-back to the original behavior is in order?

I know.  I did it once, and asked myself how often it occurs, and how
much it cost to cover it, then removed fall back code.  Was I wrong?

							matz.