Hi,

At Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:53:03 +0900,
Julian Snitow wrote:
> Perhaps in the absence of an inspect method (for whatever reason), a
> fall-back to the original behavior is in order?

Yes, it will be possible and parhaps reasonable.  I just tried
to guess the reason why matz made it like as current.

-- 
Nobu Nakada